You're right, so let's consider some other things that require the individual to actually work on things on their own in order to become skilled:
- Traditional sports; are you suggesting that experienced professionals with proven skill will immediately aid someone in becoming adept at the activity in question?
- Programming; are you suggesting that an experienced professional with proven skill will be able to automatically teach someone how to be a qualified coder without them spending time on their own to learn the basics etc?
- Since we're on the topic of aviation, let's use helicopters as an example; do you think that with basic fundamental introductory training that anyone will be able to pick up on flying helicopters on their own without having to practice it themselves first before they can truly comprehend the input that's being provided to them without understanding the basic fundamental aspects of the controls and how they affect the aircraft?
I think the most ironic part about all of this is that you think you can spin everything to look like the victim, the point that is made is that you have zero aerobatic experience and aren't qualified to make any statements with regard to it; it has nothing to do about what kind of flying you do but more importantly the type of flying that you don't do, and that's aerobatics. It's not relevant that you fly back country, it's not relevant that you are saving lives flying medavac. Nor is it relevant that I have an expensive toy, and more ironically the fact that you make a condescending remark about me having money.
The best part of all of this is that based on your post history I'm going to guess that you're roughly my age, plus or minus five years. And I'm not rich in the least bit, I just happen to spend my money on the things I'm most passionate about. The point is that in the past four (4) years, you've spent your time on this forum composing just a hair over sixteen thousand (16,000+) posts, and in all of that time it's hilarious to know how much of the things you post about you have no clue about in real life, you're just a spectator that hasn't done the things.
Before you make a condescending remark about someone's financial position, make some sort of a suggestion to someone about something you don't have the slightest clue about, take a moment to realize that your opinion can cost other people money that can be better spent elsewhere.
At the end of the day you lack even the most basic reading comprehension, the original poster said that he'd like to go to an aerobatic school this winter and his goal is to get time in a Pitts, Patty doesn't even have a Pitts for teaching. Then you claim that the airframe doesn't matter as much as the instructor which clearly illustrates the fact you have no clue what on earth you're talking about, based on your hypothesis anyone can do an acro course in Patty's Decathlon and jump into a Pitts, and if that was the case it's very likely you'd be the cause of someone getting into a major accident.
As a side note, go call Patty or Sean and tell them you want to do acro in that C182 you mention so they can laugh and hang up on you.