In the maintenance logs? From my experience on my CFI ride, just proof of all the inspections and compliance with ADs.
What's the context of your question?
Well, there was one in the airframe log and one in the engine log, and one in the propeller log on my airplane.Where are they required to be?
Annual inspections ..... are placed where?
Read 91.405, there will be more questions
Well, there was one in the airframe log and one in the engine log, and one in the propeller log on my airplane.
But I've seen airplanes with only one binder for everything, but the annual inspection still covered airframe, engine, and propeller, and called out all three.
I guess what I am asking is what has a DPE or inspector told YOU is required?
We don't get this guidance from the FSDO's, we get it from Parts 43 and 91 of the FAR's and from the PTS.I'm asking what guidance you get from your FSDO on what log entries are required.
If you're asking whether there must be an annual inspection endorsement in each of the three logs, I know the answer is no -- just in the airframe log. References are 91.409(a) and 43.11(a). The annual is performed on the "aircraft," not the individual accessories, so it goes in the "aircraft" record, which is the airframe log. And if I needed to confirm that, I'd ask my FSDO Airworthiness folks, but I've already asked that question before and had it answered.I'm asking you what is your guidance on the subject?
all three logs require a annual sign off or not ?
We don't get this guidance from the FSDO's, we get it from Parts 43 and 91 of the FAR's and from the PTS.
So what's your question, really?
If you're asking whether there must be an annual inspection endorsement in each of the three logs, I know the answer is no -
Thank you very much we agree!
- just in the airframe log. References are 91.409(a) and 43.11(a). The annual is performed on the "aircraft," not the individual accessories, so it goes in the "aircraft" record, which is the airframe log. And if I needed to confirm that, I'd ask my FSDO Airworthiness folks, but I've already asked that question before and had it answered.
Now, whether this is properly taught to every CFI in the US...
Since the aircraft isn't airworthy without the engine installed, there's no way to complete the annual without it being there, and that means the engine installed at the time of inspection must be inspected as part of that inspection, and the signing of the annual in the airframe log documents that. I just don't see a signed annual inspection with a discrepancy list that says "engine missing" and having an A&P later install the engine and sign off that installation being acceptable to the FAA.FAR 43 appendix D states
(7) All systems—for improper installation, poor general condition, apparent and obvious defects, and insecurity of attachment.
(d) Each person performing an annual or 100-hour inspection shall inspect (where applicable) components of the engine and nacelle group as follows:
(1) Engine section—for visual evidence of excessive oil, fuel, or hydraulic leaks, and sources of such leaks.
with this in mind how can an annual be completed with out the engine being included?
Since the aircraft isn't airworthy without the engine installed, there's no way to complete the annual without it being there, and that means the engine installed at the time of inspection must be inspected as part of that inspection, and the signing of the annual in the airframe log documents that. I just don't see a signed annual inspection with a discrepancy list that says "engine missing" and having an A&P later install the engine and sign off that installation being acceptable to the FAA.
We are not supposed to do it that way, If we can't complete the annual we are to make an entry stating what portion was done, and why the inspection was stopped.
Also, if the engine is swapped out later, there is no requirement to sign an annual inspection in the new engine's log, nor to sign a new annual in the aircraft's airframe log.
The BDL FSDO asked that I fill this form out (attached) before I took my CFI checkride to ensure all inspections were complete and the aircraft was in an airworthy condition. That's the most I have ever received in terms of "FSDO guidance" on the matter.
BTW, if anyone thinks there must be an annual inspection in all three logs, ask them whether they've ever seen a new annual inspection entry in the engine or prop log every time an engine or prop is swapped out. Reductio ad absurdum.
I don't disagree with Ron. I do wonder why I've always seen the entries the way I've described, though. Perhaps it's just a way of ensuring that one's butt is fully covered, or just the way the couple of shops I've seen do it. THe number of logs I've looked at aren't statistically significant. I'd be interested in hearing if others have gotten FSDO guidance and how it varies.
File this under, CFIs Who Make Up Stuff. Membership in that club remains steady.
File this under, CFIs Who Make Up Stuff. Membership in that club remains steady.
That is where I was at the start of this thread, But now I see the CFIs probably don't get any guidance, they are probably ( I'm guessing) are trying to appease their DPEs
And we will get the FSDO on this Monday..
14 CFR Part 43, Section 43.11, Content, form, and disposition of records for inspections conducted under parts 91 and 125 and 135.411(a)(1) and 135.419 of this chapter
When a mechanic approves or disapproves an aircraft for return to service after an annual, 100-hour, or progressive inspection, an entry shall be made including:
- Aircraft time in service,
- The type of inspection,
- The date of inspection,
- The signature, certificate number, and kind of certificate held by the person approving or disapproving the aircraft for return to service, and
- A signed and dated listing of discrepancies and unairworthy items.
FAR 43 appendix D states
(7) All systems—for improper installation, poor general condition, apparent and obvious defects, and insecurity of attachment.
(d) Each person performing an annual or 100-hour inspection shall inspect (where applicable) components of the engine and nacelle group as follows:
(1) Engine section—for visual evidence of excessive oil, fuel, or hydraulic leaks, and sources of such leaks.
with this in mind how can an annual be completed with out the engine being included?
If one is looking for information on FAA guidance on a particular subject, the FAA website has a TON of information on it. Most of the info is in the form of AC's (Advisory Circulars). In the case of maintenance entries, the AC is AC 43-9C. Found here:
http://www.faa.gov/regulations_poli....cfm/go/document.information/documentID/22587
AC's are considered acceptable practice or methods, not approved except in certain situations. Basically, an AC gives you general guidance on how to do something. Kind of like the AIM, but not exactly. It's more of a further explanation of the regulations.
If you go to the FAA website, under the Regulations and Policies tab, there's the AC section. There is all sorts of information there. From known ice info to information about sunglasses to EFB general info to MEL's and MMEL's..... If you have a question about the FAA interpretation of something, chances are there's an AC on it. Usually the AC number correlates to the regulation. The classic example is AC43-13.
Ok, as I'm getting your point, you're saying that the "Annual Inspection" only needs to be logged and signed off in "Aircraft Log" since the engine is part of the aircraft. You log the procedures and services in the respective books. I can see your logic. How well it works in practice with DEs and FSDO ramp checks, I have absolutely no clue. I'm trying to remember our stamps and I thought the "Annual" stamp had an option for "engine" and "airframe". If that recollection is correct, then at least convention points to it being signed "annual" in each book. Best I can recollect all my engine logs have had "Annual" sign offs in them.
I have seen DPEs make up phony requirements to refuse a checkride when a student brought in some broken-ass antique airplane that they managed to get use of for $5/hr and the DPE didn't feel comfortable flying it. Have your objectors seen the subject plane you're talking about?
Interesting to note paragraph 10, item (d) states and I quote
d.; Questions continue regarding multiple entries for lOO-hour/annual inspections. As
discussed in paragraph 5c, neither part 43 nor part 91 requires separate records to be kept.
Section 43.11, however, requires persons approving or disapproving equipment for return to
service, after any required inspection, to make an entry in the record of that equipment.
Therefore. when an owner maintains a single record, the entry of the 100-hour or annual
inspection is made in that record. If the owner maintains separate records for the airframe,
pow&plants, and propellers, the entry for the loo-hour inspection is entered in each, while the
annual inspection is only required to be entered into the airframe record.