So, the buyer normally agree on price from a remote location based on the photos and related description within an online ad to show seriousness, takes a test flight, and has a professional inspection, and then adjusts down or cancels based on the inspection?
Is that normal?
As a future buyer, it seems odd to agree on a price before physically seeing the plane. Or am I missing something?
Think of it this way. Why would one want to spend the time and money to go see a plane and do a pre-buy inspection if there wasn't already a good likihood that a deal could be reached? I guess if the buyer is willing to pay the seller's asking price, then yeah, one could go ahead and look at the plane, but even in that case, what if the plane wasn't as advertised?
The plane I bought was in Texas, and I live in California. There was no way I was going to wait until I saw the plane to start the negotiation. Why travel all the way to TX if I didn't have a reasonable expectation that we would have a deal?
I did a LOT of up front work and due diligence prior to going to see the plane. I spoke with the seller on the phone several times. I saw copies of the log books. I spoke with the plane's mechanic. I used the AOPA VREF tool, and I purchased a membership in aircraft blue book to get a good sense of a fair price. I looked at the avionics and did some research on the value of that. I spoke with other owners of that type to get their opinions and recommendations for a knowledgable mechanic.
Then I entered into the negotiation with the seller. He knew I was serious because of the research I'd done, and we agreed to a fair price. Only at that point did I then invest the time and money into a plane ticket for me and my mechanic to go do the pre-buy and test flight. A plane is an expensive investment, and I didn't want to spend time and money going to see it and do the pre-buy if I didn't already have a price agreement that I could live with.
Even when I was looking at a Cessna 185 closer to home, I went to take a cursory look at it before doing anything else, but I then did all of the due diligence and price negotiation prior to the pre-buy. The pre-buy should be the confirmation that the plane is as represented by the seller and that there are no major issues. Price should already be set and agreed to prior to that point. Any post pre-buy negotiation should only be covering adjustments to the agreed upon price based on issues found by the pre-buy.
Does that make sense?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk