Search results

Pacers are cool, but a little too cozy for me at 6’2”. I preferred the C170.

Always sump it my man.

If you have it trimmed for your approach speed, so that it flies hands off at that airspeed with a 700 FPM descent rate, yoke should only need light back pressure to round-out in ground effect. Especially in an older 172 aircraft. I’ve flown the 172M and 170, both take little pressure. The 172SP...

20-50, 20-51, whatever it takes

Oh come on now, that’s the best part!

You misspelled Cessna 195!

Logging King Air time is kinda like riding a scooter or dating fat chicks. It’s kinda fun but don’t let your jet buddies find out!

That dude is winning!

Call your provider?

Keep practicing, you will get better. Fly the plane. You could practice in closed traffic, keep the speed up until 200’, then chop and configure.

You see, here is another example of why high wings are better!

Free plane wash and electrical battery recharge!

What you need is a Cessna 195…arrive in STYLE!

Loss of power then aimed for golf course?

Citation II or King Air 200

Next question OP should ask is if he can log the time without a high altitude endorsement. I assume he already has complex and high performance endorsements. https://www.aopa.org/training-and-safety/active-pilots/ratings-and-endorsements/other-ratings

Not required for the KA 90 and 200.

It’s a single pilot plane so unless he was an MEI giving dual instruction, you can only log your stick wiggling time.

Where was the big flashing X??? Lighted barricades? Or was it just closed for noise abatement? If the latter, then sorry for buzzing your houses bruh.

Y’all should change your passwords right now. 6PC is a bot and this is a data mining thread…TMFINR