I’m going to go out on a limb, but listening to the after-crash audio, I swear I hear a turbine spooling down several seconds after the impact (before the sirens begin). Could be the APU or one of the engine cores.
What was the distance of the camera from the crash scene? One second of delay for every ~900 feet of separation.
LOL. Thanks for pointing that out...
I recall reading somewere that they are tied to the radio altimeter and will operate if it reads less than 10 ft?
That's what Juan Brown said in his video.
Not sure how that matters in this case. It was sequential - you hear the sounds of impact and break up, fairly commensurate with the visual, then the spooling down I mentioned.
Like most narrowbody transports, the 737 does not have a fuel jettison system.
The handles are latched unless a fire is detected for that engine (or the APU). The pull the fire switch, without an active fire detection, requires activating an override latch which is difficult to activate and pull with a single hand.
Thanks for the insight on procedure. The one video I’ve seem makes it appear the right engine sucked a bird, which is why I’m wondering if the fire handle got pulled.
Well, if the FO had 1,650 hours as I read, been with the company nearly a year (again what I read), he had been there since February 2023, and was hired at the minimum number of hours of 1,500 (not anything I read), that would be just 150 hours accumulated in that time span.
Seems I read minimum hours was 300, not 1,500.
Here it is:
Or decided not to.
APU maybe, but I'm not thinking anything was going to be rotating on the engines after they hit that berm.
I'm just glad I'm not crazy and didn't miss shrapnel damage on this tail! 
are you sure there is a 1500 hour minimum?
Depends on the government controlling the investigation. I don’t have an answer for you.
This one is a real mystery. Did they secure the one operating engine? With all the duplicate systems and the free fall gear extension, how could they have landed no flaps and gear up, other than intentionally? Was there a massive electrical fault, even though at some time they had radios? Why did the SBD engine TR appear to deploy? Is a WOW switch or RA reading enough to unlock the TRs? Why were they so fast? Why didn't the airport taper the area between the end of the runway and the berm into a ramp to absorb some of the kinetic energy?
Thrust reverser lock-out based on radar altitude. Not all airplanes have a lock-out. The DC9s I flew for over a decade did not.
Juan Browne and Denys/PilotBlog (https://www.youtube.com/@PilotBlogDenys/videos) believe that only the engine no. 2 (right) was running on landing, even though that was the one with the apparent compressor stall, perhaps because of bird strike. There's a clearly visible exhaust plume from no. 2 (right) but not no. 1 in the nose-on video of the landing. They suggest the pilots may have had no power or inadequate power in both engines, perhaps due to bird ingestion in no. 1 as well as no. 2. Or conceivably they shut down the wrong one (no. 1) after the compressor stall? They go on to say that optimal landing configuration for the 737 with dual engine failure is no flaps (and I think they said no gear as well?). Denys says he's highly experienced personally in the 737-800 and seems to know what he's talking about. If so, the flap retraction and no gear may have been intentional -- in which case they were too fast and too close, but committed at least from turning base. Denys includes a graph showing approximate glide slopes with and without flaps and gear, i.e. much longer glide in the clean configuration. (I'm definitely not a jet guy -- happy to stand corrected in all this!)
The "lifeboat" of record for Butch and Suni was Starliner, until the minute it undocked prior to making a successful return.
It's a bit early to blame Boeing for this one.
www.nbcnews.com
Nope. Read the citations. There was a crew that came back on the Dragon capsule and were "unexpectedly hospitalized", one crew member longer than the others.
Nor did any citation explain why they were hospitalized. You are also ignoring all the other SpaceX issues from last year. Including a helium leak.
You're overlooking that SpaceX has issues similar to Boeing now. You're overlooking that the Jeju Aircrash is from an older aircraft, while the crashes that Boeing rightfully should be held responsible were new aircraft. Yet you are happy insinuating that Boeing is somehow responsible for the crash in Korea when no one knows what happened.
Four astronauts, who had just spent 235 days in space, went in for routine medical exams after a nominal return to earth to end a successful mission. That's not hospitalization. One of them was kept overnight in the hospital after 235 days in space, for an unknown medical condition. I'm baffled how you concluded that any of this is a black mark for SpaceX.