I find this extraordinary: the CEO is also the test pilot

MountainDude

Cleared for Takeoff
PoA Supporter
Joined
Jul 29, 2011
Messages
1,018
Display Name

Display name:
MountainDude
I have a reasonable amount of respect for a CEO who is willing to put himself on the line to prove his product. That's a fairly unimpeachable demonstration of belief in what he's trying to bring to market.
 
While I respect his determination, I'd probably stick to one job or another if I were him.
 
Reminds me of the very early days of aviation, where the engineer who designed the airplane was typically also the very first test pilot. It greatly accelerated progress in aircraft design as it helped eliminate design principles of aircraft that turned out to be not safe. Somewhat macabre, yes, but oh so effective!

- Martin
 
Reminds me of the very early days of aviation, where the engineer who designed the airplane was typically also the very first test pilot. It greatly accelerated progress in aircraft design as it helped eliminate design principles of aircraft that turned out to be not safe. Somewhat macabre, yes, but oh so effective!

- Martin
Indeed. If you only get to have one bad idea, you're highly motivated to ensure that your ideas are good ones!
 
Has happened before. THe BD-10/Peregrine killed a couple of CEOs.
 
it was the first production model, not the first flight of a new design, so there was a lot less risk.

But BETA is his passion project, so why not let him have some of the fun?
 
Reminds me of the very early days of aviation, where the engineer who designed the airplane was typically also the very first test pilot. It greatly accelerated progress in aircraft design as it helped eliminate design principles of aircraft that turned out to be not safe. Somewhat macabre, yes, but oh so effective!

- Martin

"In those early days, the Chief Engineer was almost always the Chief Pilot as well. This had the automatic result of eliminating poor engineering very early in aviation."
- Igor Sikorsky

 
it was the first production model, not the first flight of a new design, so there was a lot less risk.
As opposed to say

Xf11_usaf.jpg

or
spruce-goose-top.gif
 
"In those early days, the Chief Engineer was almost always the Chief Pilot as well. This had the automatic result of eliminating poor engineering very early in aviation."
- Igor Sikorsky

Here's what's further down the page where that quote is from:

"The difference is positive and definite. Right means success; wrong means the neck, together with most of the other bones, will be broken. Permitting myself to dream of the destinies of mankind, I thought how wonderful it would be if similar natural laws were to regulate some other branches of human activities. Take, for instance, the case of stubborn radicals with lust for power, who make a career and personal success by using wrong principles. How much better it would be if, as the result of the wrong ideas, they would break their own necks rather than spread misery to a multitude of unfortunate, trusting people. What wonderful progress would humanity make if foolish and false ideas in philosophy of life and political economy eliminated themselves, with their creators, as completely as the mistakes of a pilot-designer eliminated him and his machine."
Igor Sikorsky - The Story of the WINGED-S
 
Last edited:
Inspirational when people put skin in the game, but developing aircraft is not without risk. The CEO of Sonex died in an experimental Sonex. And the wife of the CEO of Epic died in an experimental Epic.
 
developing aircraft is not without risk. The CEO of Sonex died in an experimental Sonex.
That's certainly true. AOPA's story about the crash here. He was a designer of Sonex aircraft like the Onex. But the stories I read didn't mention whether the fatal flight was actually a test vs just a regular flight that went bad -- I'm still wondering about that.
 
Back
Top