Kim you are too high strung.
WHAT flight?? She clearly stated she's never met the person. So how could she not be paying her pro rata share of a flight that has not and may never occur?I am wondering if there is any way that the FAA would consider using money deposited into a flying account to be a violation of (c) above, or the fact that the FAA considers flight time to be compensation if the pilot doesn't pay for it (can't find it in part 61... yet...).
Yes, I still have doubt. I am wondering if there is any way that the FAA would consider using money deposited into a flying account to be a violation of (c) above. But I no longer care because it seems that my simple question, intended to increase my knowledge, has been blown out of proportion. Never mind.
A long time ago when I worked at a flight school I owed someone some money for a bar tab. I didn't have any cash on me, so I used my card and just put money on their flying account.
I think this person IS realizing a benefit from this flight, or whatever she's gonna do with the gift. It's something I would imagine would never hold up in court though...a warm feeling .It seems to me that the payer, whether it is Kimberly's friend or a scholarship committee, would need to realize some benefit from the flight in order for it to be a flight "for compensation or hire".
Thank you. I don't know you personally so I will refrain from making any remarks about you.
True. It's a benefit the FAA doesn't care about, however.I think this person IS realizing a benefit from this flight, or whatever she's gonna do with the gift. It's something I would imagine would never hold up in court though...a warm feeling .
Enjoy your gift, Kim.
Can we extract money from that account to pay for Kimberly's flying?PoA is funding accounts??
I have a mortgage...
Chase Accout Number HM0892476447-46632
Thanks in advance...
Sorry Lance. Haven't been able to use the house as an ATM since 2007!Can we extract money from that account to pay for Kimberly's flying?
Thank you. I don't know you personally so I will refrain from making any remarks about you.
BaZinGa!
---
Kim:
I appreciate your relentlessly positive attitude towards flying, your enthusiasm about sharing flight, and your generous spirit in taking others to fly.
For all these reasons, I look forward to meeting you some day.
best,
/s/ Spike
(c) A private pilot may not pay less than the pro rata share of the operating expenses of a flight with passengers, provided the expenses involve only fuel, oil, airport expenditures, or rental fees.
Yes, I still have doubt. I am wondering if there is any way that the FAA would consider using money deposited into a flying account to be a violation of (c) above, or the fact that the FAA considers flight time to be compensation if the pilot doesn't pay for it (can't find it in part 61... yet...). But I no longer care because it seems that my simple question, intended to increase my knowledge, has been blown out of proportion. Never mind.
<edited to add the section about flight time being compensation>
This is really pretty simple, and for some reason you're looking for a violation where there isn't any. The intent of the regulation in question is to prevent those with a private pilot certificate from becoming de facto commercial operators. It's quite a stretch to interpret a gift to someone's flight school account as an act of hiring that individual to provide pilot services for the benefit of the giver.
JKG
Spike,
That is sweet. Unfortunately we cannot please all of the people all of the time. I am aware of the people who not only dislike me, but who have privately listed numerous negative observations about me.
Unsolicited.
I am sad to see what the forums are becoming, but, since I've met so many of you in person, I know that the good people are still here.
We have to embrace the good and try our best to ignore (or at least not encourage) the bad.
Kimberly
I've been lucky to have met some wonderful people as a result of this board. (Cue "In My Life" by John Lennon)
No, I'm not looking for a violation. I was looking to learn. That didn't happen in this thread.
Not for lack of people trying. Information has been dispensed, just not absorbed.No, I'm not looking for a violation. I was looking to learn. That didn't happen in this thread.
I'm am still amazed that any human with such limited time on earth would spend countless hours memorizing the FAR/AIM and considering its possible interpretations.
Not for lack of people trying. Information has been dispensed, just not absorbed.
And the beatings will continue until morale improves.
I am aware of the people who not only dislike me, but who have privately listed numerous negative observations about me.
Seriously guys, drop it, let Kimberly be happy and share her happiness. If you want to sit here and destroy every thread with regulations debate make another thread for that or find a different forum.
Spike,
That is sweet. Unfortunately we cannot please all of the people all of the time. I am aware of the people who not only dislike me, but who have privately listed numerous negative observations about me.
We have to embrace the good and try our best to ignore (or at least not encourage) the bad.
Kimberly
I'm really curious about why Kimberly thinks that the people on this forum who may not like her are necessarily "bad" people?? It's very possible that they may be "good" people, or even "great" people. Or maybe... "just average" people who just happen to have an opinion about one particular person on this forum. Hmm... just sayin'.
And now, back to your regularly scheduled drama.
I'm really curious about why Kimberly thinks that the people on this forum who may not like her are necessarily "bad" people?? It's very possible that they may be "good" people, or even "great" people. Or maybe... "just average" people who just happen to have an opinion about one particular person on this forum. Hmm... just sayin'.
And now, back to your regularly scheduled drama.
I'm really curious about why Kimberly thinks that the people on this forum who may not like her are necessarily "bad" people?? It's very possible that they may be "good" people, or even "great" people. Or maybe... "just average" people who just happen to have an opinion about one particular person on this forum. Hmm... just sayin'.
And now, back to your regularly scheduled drama.
Anybody who makes up a private list of "negative observations" about a person they encounter on an internet forum has something "bad" going on and probably needs a restraining order with their name on it.
This is just my opinion, but.....
Maybe she does'nt. It may be that she, as many people on a forum do, bring forth honest questions, offer advise, or
Unless you have read the PRIVATE emails / PMs / etc that I am talking about I doubt you have any idea who or what I am referring to. If everyone on POA was great then we wouldn't have locked threads.
Just introducing the idea which could be new to you, that everyone's world doesn't center around this forum. And maybe, just maybe, some of those observations might have been caused by the actions or posts of the observee. In this case... you. I don't have to read any of your "private e-mails/ PMs/ etc" to have an opinion about that. And that doesn't make anyone necessarily a "bad" person. Just sayin'... again.
Show me where I said somebody was a bad person. I said I got emails with unsolicited comments. I never said anyone was bad. But what I find interesting is these all came from people I have never met. None of the comments came from folks at the fly-ins.