gkainz
Final Approach
if that's what you want to call it .... iirc (which was a long time ago), it's an ALQ pod.
I was, (VAQ 129,135,and 131), and the RAT was next to the fuselage on the upper wing root. but I can't remember which sideah yes ... but I think the Intruder/Prowlers had a RAT (Ram Air Turbine) ... the pod hanging off the port outboard pylon is an ALQ-xx pod (again, really old memory, and I was not in a Prowler squadron) and had a self-contained generator prop on the front.
The PODS had their own Electrical supply mounted in the nose of the pod's hard back.I was, (VAQ 129,135,and 131), and the RAT was next to the fuselage on the upper wing root. but I can't remember which side
So, now you get nit picky rather than admit you screwed up.
Evelyn Wood has a couple on line courses that you you need to take.
The PODS had their own Electrical supply mounted in the nose of the pod's hard back.
I catch a poster talking about things he has admitted knowing nothing about, and you say this, laughablePot - please don't call Kettle black
I could give you some documentation and factory information on installing wooden propellers but I don't think it will do much good.I catch a poster talking about things he has admitted knowing nothing about, and you say this, laughable
Manufacturers use different terms, ADG Air Driven Generator is common for that and RAT Ram Air Turbine often drives an hydraulic pump.What that? I was just guessing. We had ones that would pop out the side and run a generator if we lost total electric, but this was on CRJs.
View attachment 49605
Port shoulder. So counting the RAT, two visible ALQ-99's and the ALQ-99 that's probably on the centerline in the photo, there are 4 props, none of which provide thrust.I was, (VAQ 129,135,and 131), and the RAT was next to the fuselage on the upper wing root. but I can't remember which side
Flew out of Miramar, with AJ on the tail (for one cruise, anyway)Port shoulder. So counting the RAT, two visible ALQ-99's and the ALQ-99 that's probably on the centerline in the photo, there are 4 props, none of which provide thrust.
And since you're a Navy guy, albeit a west-coast guy, surely when you said AB you were referring to Carrier Air Wing 1.
Nauga,
deflected
Those are all certified props being mounted on certified aircraft. now lets talk 0-200 pushing (not tractor)with a Ted Hendricks prop that weighs 7 pounds.I never installed a wood propeller, only metal constant speed, and they go on two ways - position 1, or 180 degrees from position 1.
That being said, Sensenich Wood Propeller has in their installation instructions to put the No. 1 cylinder at TDC, and then install the prop so that the blades are at 10 and 4 o'clock. Here's a link to their instructions.
http://www.sensenich.com/files/docu...ons_Wood_Aircraft_Installation_1452800693.pdf
The EA6B had no props. with 5 pods loaded (very seldom) there would be 6 Ram Air Turbines, aboard, we almost always ran three tanks an 2 pods.Port shoulder. So counting the RAT, two visible ALQ-99's and the ALQ-99 that's probably on the centerline in the photo, there are 4 props, none of which provide thrust.
And since you're a Navy guy, albeit a west-coast guy, surely when you said AB you were referring to Carrier Air Wing 1.
Nauga,
deflected
Nope that only came up after the thread was hi-jacked.And since you're a Navy guy, albeit a west-coast guy, surely when you said AB you were referring to Carrier Air Wing 1. Nauga,deflected
The EA6B had no props. with 5 pods loaded (very seldom) there would be 6 Ram Air Turbines, aboard, we almost always ran three tanks an 2 pods.
yes, the pods rats were 25KVA generators they ran only what was mounted in the pod.Why so many RATs, all the electronic gear onboard?
that will be the plan.I would clock the prop in the OP, to facilitate ease of starting by the armstrong technique. Or, mabe clock it so that it would stop horizontal every time, (that way I don't have to move it after shutdown, "one less thing")
It is a wooden propeller on an aircraft engine. Seems to make sense to me.were it only to have a bearing on the topic.
Sensenich doesn't make props for E-AB aircraft unless you used a prop that is also use on Certified aircraft, and there is none that I know of.It is a wooden propeller on an aircraft engine. Seems to make sense to me.
Does Tony Bingelis cover the issue in any of his books?
So using instructions for certified aircraft is a bad idea for experimentals? Missed that one. Probably should not maintain that O-200 using the manufacturer's instructions either since it is on an experimental airplane.Sensenich doesn't make props for E-AB aircraft unless you used a prop that is also use on Certified aircraft, and there is none that I know of.
SO.. their instructions do not apply
Thread creep. Like pods.Nope that only came up after the thread was hi-jacked.
Are they Amateur Built?Thread creep. Like pods.
In the Air Force, AB is the first rank of most enlisted personnel.
So using instructions for certified aircraft is a bad idea for experimentals? Missed that one. Probably should not maintain that O-200 using the manufacturer's instructions either since it is on an experimental airplane.
Usually. And in the spirit of CFR 14, solely for education or recreation. Or maybe procreation.Are they Amateur Built?
In the Air Force, AB is the first rank of most enlisted personnel.
Yep, pretty much..Then do what you want. It's experimental. Experiment.
Then why did you ask? Just to be an ass?Yep, pretty much..
no,,, Asked because you never know who will have the answer, But then there those like you.Then why did you ask? Just to be an ass?
Yes, yes there are.no,,, Asked because you never know who will have the answer, But then there those like you.
That's not what Flight Deck control calls them when you want an elevator run to get one to the roof.if that's what you want to call it .... iirc (which was a long time ago), it's an ALQ pod.
And they are the ones who would never suspect a question is asked because some wants the answer. rather than the attack on the OP.Yes, yes there are.
@Tom-DIf it is a four cylinder (seems likely) then I would suggest clocking it for TDC at about 90 degrees to the horizon. I don't like hand propping an engine when the mags click when the prop is vertical .
I have no more guidance than that other than to look at the engine maintenance manual or possibly the TDCS.