...I don't recall what the Mythbusters determined...
Plausible. One story was a guy was hit while he standing under a car port with a fiberglas roof. They talked to the doctor and saw the X-ray of the bullet in his head.
...I don't recall what the Mythbusters determined...
CDC disputes that:
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/wk/mm5350.pdf
As does this report: http://airwolf.lmtonline.com/news/archive/010202/pagea1.pdf
I don't recall what the Mythbusters determined...
CDC disputes that:
Source: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/wk/mm5350.pdf
As does this report: http://airwolf.lmtonline.com/news/archive/010202/pagea1.pdf
I don't recall what the Mythbusters determined...
Tell that to the dead guy(s) in Puerto Rico.
Tell that to the dead guy(s) in Puerto Rico.
I dunno. We had some pretty nice scopes and calibers in tanks and scout vehicles but our antiaircraft drill was "put as much lead about where the airplane will be as possoble -- you might hit it..."
The bullet drop at angles much more than 10 degree up elevation is pretty steep.
Yeah, I'm not talking about an angry woman firing at airplanes over her house, I was talking about the scenario where the shooters were hunters with significant experience. And I agree that even then it's not a slam dunk, but even if it were only one in ten chance I'd rather not be on the receiving end.
Though the shooting prowess of the average hunter is far surpassed by the gear he totes.
I went to a gun range with a buddy that had just bought a big caliber short barrel hand gun.
We set up at about 5 yards, he aims, fires...
Him (excited): "I can't see a hole in the paper, I must have hit the bullseye!!!"
Me: "No, you were about three feet high and to the right I saw the puff of dirt where it hit."
.60 cal black powder pistol. Might not hit what you're aiming at, but it'll hurt whatever it DOES hit.
.60 cal black powder pistol. Might not hit what you're aiming at, but it'll hurt whatever it DOES hit.
I suppose you are right but I always imagined these people as being a little loaded and PO'd at the airplane noise scaring the game away. OK, so it's a stereotype but then again, I have heard stories about hunting parties with the emphasis on "party" from the participants.I'd think it wouldn't be all that hard to hit a plane flying between 500 and 1500 AGL with a scoped rifle. Seems to me the airplane would make a reasonably large and stable target if it was just flying in circles. A little knowledge about the likely speed of the plane coupled with the ability to judge the proper lead and it doesn't sound too difficult.
This airplane had an interesting early life but I don't think it included being a drug runner.Maybe the plane had been used for drug running and was shot while flying at a very low level from someone up higher on a ridge? Your theory of the round coming back down from a high trajectory sounds plausible assuming the jet was on or near the ground at the time though.
I suppose you are right but I always imagined these people as being a little loaded and PO'd at the airplane noise scaring the game away. OK, so it's a stereotype but then again, I have heard stories about hunting parties with the emphasis on "party" from the participants.
....
Newspaper said:KRCG News reached out to Judy Davis for her side of the story. Phone calls were not returned. Davis did not answer the door at her home.