bbchien
Touchdown! Greaser!
John asks a question which is quintessentially about pilot judgement. Not the pilot with whom you might fly, but the pilot who is deciding with whom to fly/not fly.
Of course you can now see I've framed the question as a go/no go. It's about US.
If I have no prior knowledge of the pilot, and it's his a/c, I can and do:
Look at the aircraft papers.
Look at the annual signoff.
Then I look at the attitude of the pilot with whom I might fly. If he's good with all I've asked, then I ask about insurance. If he's not good with all I have asked, it's "bye bye, thanks anyway". It's a rare guy who carries his binder and I don't expect to see it.
That eliminates about 98% of the guys with whom I should not fly. The remaining 2%- well that's an intuitive JUDGEMENT.
Never mind the survey categories....
Look at his Pilot cert, his BFR signoff, and his IPC if he is not currrent.
Of course you can now see I've framed the question as a go/no go. It's about US.
If I have no prior knowledge of the pilot, and it's his a/c, I can and do:
Look at the aircraft papers.
Look at the annual signoff.
Then I look at the attitude of the pilot with whom I might fly. If he's good with all I've asked, then I ask about insurance. If he's not good with all I have asked, it's "bye bye, thanks anyway". It's a rare guy who carries his binder and I don't expect to see it.
That eliminates about 98% of the guys with whom I should not fly. The remaining 2%- well that's an intuitive JUDGEMENT.
Never mind the survey categories....
Look at his Pilot cert, his BFR signoff, and his IPC if he is not currrent.