Um, yeah. I'm married, with one on the way, and teaching full time. $25/hr is NOT enough to have a decent living. Right now I can only afford this because I have a place to stay for virtually nothing... And I charge a bit more than $25/hr. If you are doing it because you love it (I do) and try to do it full time, you're going to have to charge a bit more than that if you aren't already on some sort of retirement pay. Besides, only cheapskates aren't interested in the well being of those they do business with. I'm OK with the $65/hr shop rate that I get charged by a mechanic, and the auto mechanic I may have to take my car to soon charges $75/hr, while my plumber friend gets $60/hr. Professionals shouldn't be expected to starve for your wallet.If you're retired or otherwise financially set, then being a "for the joy of it" CFI at $25/hr works.
If you're aspiring for an airline career, then being a "for the time building" CFI (where you may gross $25/hr) works.
Very few folks can raise a family in a major metro area even if they were charging and keeping $50/hr for being a CFI. Weather and other factors get in the way.
Um, yeah. I'm married, with one on the way, and teaching full time. $25/hr is NOT enough to have a decent living. Right now I can only afford this because I have a place to stay for virtually nothing... And I charge a bit more than $25/hr. If you are doing it because you love it (I do) and try to do it full time, you're going to have to charge a bit more than that if you aren't already on some sort of retirement pay. Besides, only cheapskates aren't interested in the well being of those they do business with. I'm OK with the $65/hr shop rate that I get charged by a mechanic, and the auto mechanic I may have to take my car to soon charges $75/hr, while my plumber friend gets $60/hr. Professionals shouldn't be expected to starve for your wallet.
Ryan
Wrong. I charge $25/hr. A number of other freelance instructors that aren't about building time, are also in that range. My primary was also not a time builder - $25/hr. My SES and ME instructor was also not a time builder. Thank you for playing, we have some lovely parting gifts for you.
Um, yeah. I'm married, with one on the way, and teaching full time. $25/hr is NOT enough to have a decent living. Right now I can only afford this because I have a place to stay for virtually nothing... And I charge a bit more than $25/hr. If you are doing it because you love it (I do) and try to do it full time, you're going to have to charge a bit more than that if you aren't already on some sort of retirement pay. Besides, only cheapskates aren't interested in the well being of those they do business with. I'm OK with the $65/hr shop rate that I get charged by a mechanic, and the auto mechanic I may have to take my car to soon charges $75/hr, while my plumber friend gets $60/hr. Professionals shouldn't be expected to starve for your wallet.
Ryan
I would like to see more requirements for starting threads on this board.
What are you doing charging $25/hr in 2013 and where is this out of?
No kidding. Especially with all the hate towards an CFI who may have career aspirations beyond instructing that prevails here. I don''t plan on doing this full time for the rest of my career,but that doesn't mean I hate instructing and don't care about my students. In fact, the exact opposite is true. Those grey hair CFIs (who I regularly take advice from) were new once too...
Over 95% of the instructors I know are NOT building time - in fact off the top of my head, I can't think of a current instructor I know who is building time. Stay away from the puppy mills and you see that percentage swing vastly more my way. My price doesn't go up. I'm just charging enough to cover gas to and from the airport, and a bite to eat after each lesson since I'm not eating at home, and maybe a little extra.
I zero issue with new CFIs, I have issues with CFIs that mention "only xxx more hours until..." every other flight.
I have zero issue with new CFIs, I have issues with CFIs that mention "only xxx more hours until..." every other flight.
I don't think a CFI should mention that to a student unless directly asked. I also don't think we need to terminate the entire group of CFI's to stop something I've never heard of happening. (Not saying it's never happened...just I've never heard of it).
The one that I had for my commercial, said it nearly every flight. He was probably the worst instructor I had. He also had 0 IMC time, and I probably had 4-5 times the XC hours he did.
Okay, so the answer to your bad instructor problem is to ground all instructors that happen to share one trait he had...building time. Sounds like that wasn't even the trait you had issue with.
If the time building was not allowed, the issue wouldn't be allowed to manifest itself.
With the same logic, if we gouged out the eyeballs of every CFI the issue would be solved too.
If your CFI fills out his logbook before yours, find a new one.
If the time building was not allowed, the issue wouldn't be allowed to manifest itself.
Personally I'd like to see CFI PIC time go the way of the dodo. Reduce the ATP time to 1000 hours, with more XC, more actual. Commercial is fine at 250, and push the CFI hours to 500 and CFII to 700 with 50-100 hours of actual IMC.
If you fired him, and told him why. Wouldn't the issue start correcting itself?
Incorrect fallacy. Try again. No, actually, don't. You're in over your head.
That is a double negative. So you're saying I'm correct or are you in over YOUR head?
I can tell when you're beat. You come back with a post like that. It says nothing and belittles. At this point I realize you are not in this to discuss. You simply want me and others to agree with you. We are not going to, but that's all you're looking for here, IMO.
So, I'll let it be. Sure. Change the rules to not allow CFI's to log their hours. Good luck with that.
I missed a comma.
I get that you're an advocate for crappy instruction.
So let's just keep putting ****ty instructors out there, and do nothing to try and combat it.
I think a CFI should be able to log at least enough CFI PIC time to be current, and should get some form of credit for their effort, but I wouldn't be sorry to see less time builders. I have had to undo some of their work and help students that weren't treated very well by them, either. Had one guy come to me with 190 hours as and a bunch of instructors. Had to undo some confusion from multiple instructors, but got him finished in fairly short order.
Ryan
Sent from my unknown device using Tapatalk 2
Personally I'd like to see CFI PIC time go the way of the dodo. Reduce the ATP time to 1000 hours, with more XC, more actual. Commercial is fine at 250, and push the CFI hours to 500 and CFII to 700 with 50-100 hours of actual IMC.
Medial Collateral Ligament?
What evidence do you have that it would end GA "as we know it"?
Sure, instruction quality would go up. But that's because there would only be a handful of instructors across the nation. Cost would obviously follow. So a PPL goes to $25K. Student starts would also drop by 99%. With so few pilots it'd be that much easier to get rid of GA altogether as an unecessary expense. FBOs close, airports too.
We're already on that road, but not allowing CFIs to log time would make it a much shorter trip.
Snark aside your post did not discredit my point. MOST instructors (maybe not you) are in it for the time, not money. If they all go away that affects the supply and demand equation. When supply goes down price goes up.
My fault. I didn't mean MOST of the instructors 'you know' instruct to build time. I should have stated MOST of the instructors 'as a whole' instruct to build time.
Regardless, you have to concede that flight instruction is a classic way for people to build time. If that's true then a change to their ability to log that time would result in fewer instructors and fewer instructors would result in overall higher cost of training.
Are we really arguing this point? It really seems obvious to me.
I'm not aware of 'ATP mills'. I would think the ATP is a very small percentage of any 141 schools program. However,
If all those 'mills' were to close down or be forced to compete for professional instructors I think it stands to reason that the compensation for those instructors would go up.
I'm only speaking here of the idea of changing the regs to not allow the CFI to log the hours.
It's an academic discussion anyway. It's not going to happen. Even if it did airline interviewers would most likely just look at total time and add to it the hours of dual given and make a decision based on that. If the dual given were not allowed to be credited towards the 1500 then a problem arises where a pilot would have to decide how they wanted to get to the 1500.
Honestly, I'd rather have them instruct than go up and down 20 thousand times in a jump plane or tow banners over the same 10 mile stretch of beach or haul gliders.
CFI affords the greatest possibility of learning of all the ratings save maybe 'student pilot'. By that I mean the learning curve is the steepest for the CFI than all the others. Maybe Instrument comes close...
Whatever, opinions vary.
While I too am not sure what 'MCL' stands for, your question has been answered.
I suppose an incorrect answer, is an answer. Now, does anyone have a more plausible answer to the question?
There is only one person that I can see that believes that answer to be incorrect.
Perhaps you need to take some more economics classes. The simplistic straight line supply and demand vs price graph is not in play here. Try again.
Medial Collateral Ligament?
What evidence do you have that it would end GA "as we know it"?
Does FYIGM apply here?
Your oft repeated end of post quip 'Try again' is annoying. I'm trying hard to see past it but you don't make it easy with your empty counter points. It's like arguing with a 3rd grader who time and time again simply sticks their tongue out at you.
I'm going to treat you the same way I'd treat someone else's kid who was displaying that behavior...I'm going to dis-engage.