zaitcev
En-Route
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2010
- Messages
- 3,259
- Display Name
Display name:
Pete Zaitcev
No Champ? Also, GT500 is certificated?! Mother of God.
No Champ? Also, GT500 is certificated?! Mother of God.
Well, the first thing are Sonexes, of course. Just make sure they actually comply with LSA rules about Vs0, in writing. Those easily comply with your speed requirements, although not sure about payload. They are all above $30k though.
Next come Seareys, if you're into that. They are very slow, like slower than Cub slow, but ton of fun, great community, etc. etc. They are very close to blowing your "faster than a car" requirement. Texas freeways are just too good. If you relocate to Florida or Louisiana, though...
There's also a pretty RANS S-7 for sale for $27k. It's a little bit faster than a Cub, toe brakes. Sadly, Jabiru engine on that one.
Mostly because it's different. There's nothing particularly wrong with it, but then there's nothing wrong with ULpower either. I know whom to call to fix a Rotax.Just curious why don't you like the Jabiru engine?
So we’ve owned two Jabiru engines: One that failed catastrophically after 60 hours, and one that failed catastrophically after 2.5 hours and again after 480 hours. That’s an average of 180 hours between catastrophic failures. At that rate we can expect a forced landing in a cow pasture every 18 months.
No Champ? Also, GT500 is certificated?! Mother of God.
But the current production ACA 7EC is not on the list, why is that? It seems to comply with all requirements, but the company website is suspiciously quiet on the issue, too. I'm wondering if there's a catch.Aeronca 7AC, 7BCM, 7CCM, 7DC and bunches of others on that list are Champs.
No Champ? Also, GT500 is certificated?! Mother of God.
About 600 lbs useful, depending how it's built. I already linked a couple of similar S-6 above, for Nick to chomp at.You say you don't mind experimental, and this is in your revised $50k range: http://www.controller.com/listingsd...YOTE-II/2006-RANS-S-6S-COYOTE-II/1217945.htm?
Not sure about load though.
I dunno about this one. As much as I like Sky Arrows (especially the visibility), the useful load is about 100 to 120 lbs less than on S-6. Nick is heavier than I am, his wife is heavier than my wife, and I remember that Sky Arrow was kind of marginal for us with any baggage. The example linked is overpriced, too. Basically half the life of the engine is gone, and what they ask, $55k? Please! Finally, I have a nagging suspicion that I saw that airplane before, and it was not flying, being stuck in the owner's garage. I think I recognize the fence in the picture... I am likely to be completely wrong about it though.This is $5k above, but should be able to handle the loads just fine. It does at Chesapeake Sport Pilot. http://www.controller.com/listingsdetail/aircraft-for-sale/SKY-ARROW-600-SPORT/2006-SKY-ARROW-600-SPORT/1191893.htm
About 600 lbs useful, depending how it's built. I already linked a couple of similar S-6 above, for Nick to chomp at.
I dunno about this one. As much as I like Sky Arrows (especially the visibility), the useful load is about 100 to 120 lbs less than on S-6. Nick is heavier than I am, his wife is heavier than my wife, and I remember that Sky Arrow was kind of marginal for us with any baggage. The example linked is overpriced, too. Basically half the life of the engine is gone, and what they ask, $55k? Please! Finally, I have a nagging suspicion that I saw that airplane before, and it was not flying, being stuck in the owner's garage. I think I recognize the fence in the picture... I am likely to be completely wrong about it though.