Notwithstanding how they're spelled, I cannot emphasize strongly enough that blind reliance on this advice can (and often does) burn car buyers. Buy the car, not the brand.
Everything else being equal, a (fill in "bulletproof" Japanese nameplate here) may be more reliable than (fill in putatively crappy alternative nameplate here). Problem, is, everything else is never equal. Example: Hondacura, Lexusota, Nissiniti, all engineer and build good cars, but as a result, the used car values are stratospheric, and anything in these makes which falls into Greg's stated price range is going to be used up.
I'd much prefer to have a well cared-for Chevrolet, Ford or Dodge, than a twice-the-miles Honda, Acura, Lexus, whatever.
And, by the way, notwithstanding the hype, most domestic cars have achieved, statistically, parity with the Japanese nameplates.
I remember when Japanese cars wouldn't start on cold days- but they got better. I also remember when GM and Ford refused to build cars that were worth a lick- and they got better, too.
Shop for a car that shows good maintenance and care, and you'll likely do well. If you'd bought my Jeep Cherokee I sold with 160,000 miles, you would have likely driven it another 100,000 miles with minimal care (like the guy who biught it from me did). If you'd bought my old Sedan deVille from me with 178,000 miles like my brother-in-law did (*that* made me nervous), you might have driven it 80,000 ,ore miles, then sold it to someone who used it in an armed robbery six months later (OK, that is not really relevant- but, hey! It was runnin'!).
If you'd bought the looks-like-new, low-miles Infiniti that my mom bought, you'd have bought the lemon of the century.
Buy the car, not the brand.