Done nearly 2 years ago.Tom...you really need to report this. https://www.faa.gov/aircraft/safety/programs/sups/
Want to shock yourself with airplane part prices? Look up a Cessna 180-185 oil filter adapter.
Try to buy the plastic cover over the gear emergency crank in a Bonanza. It's a formed piece of ABS plastic, bowl shaped maybe 5x5in.
well.....but that doesn't apply to "common" parts.Now you know why we have FAA/PMA tags and 8030-3 forms
Now you know why we have FAA/PMA tags and 8030-3 forms
well.....but that doesn't apply to "common" parts.
he got's the number wrong....What is an 8030-3 form?
That isn't the issue here, I set the standard for my engines, New OEM parts are the norm, They are available that is what gets used.
I really doubt you can find a new OEM wheel bearing for a J-3, so the aftermarket Timkins are used.
he got's the number wrong....
We were not talking common AN hardware.well.....but that doesn't apply to "common" parts.
Close enough for who we are talking to.What is an 8030-3 form?
Miss the point again, Aye!If you don't like the price of OEM parts, then lower your standards. You seem to be complaining about something that you actively promote. Confusing.
nuts, bolts, and fasteners are common parts....what part of that is AN?We were not talking common AN hardware.
To answer your question you must understand the difference between a manufacturers specific part number and a common AN hardware number.nuts, bolts, and fasteners are common parts....what part of that is AN?
Miss the point again, Aye!
A form your vender sends you with parts. Meanwhile a vendor will send an 8130-3.What is an 8030-3 form?
Problem with your theory is, these are 80 year old engines, the manufacturer has not supported them for small parts for a very long time, the once $.25 bolt is now difficult to find, and costs $25.00 when you do.That specific parts made in the thousands cost more than those made in the millions?
I was once challenged on why I wanted to change a turbine retention bolt, because it is "expensive". I said 1) it is scored and 2) it holds your $50,000 turbine into your $500,000 engine that is installed in your $6,000,000 aircraft and 3) it is $200. Expensive can be subjective.
Same goes with my 182's wheel bearings. When it's time to replace them my A&P sends me down to NAPA with the part number.
Problem with your theory is, these are 80 year old engines, the manufacturer has not supported them for small parts for a very long time, the once $.25 bolt is now difficult to find, and costs $25.00 when you do.
Sure. You have Cleveland wheels?I've never been able to make that exact cross. Would you mind patching me the NAPA p/n so I can "compare the two"??
Well here is the kicker,, I tear down old engines, some have the wrong bolts installed. normally this cost is passed on, but this time ??Cost of doing business in 2018 I guess. Bet you won't throw those away again!
don't need to....the heads are marked.To answer your question you must understand the difference between a manufacturers specific part number and a common AN hardware number.
When you can explain that, you'll answer your own question.
don't need to....the heads are marked.
well.....then, there's his problem.Not always.
Well here is the kicker,, I tear down old engines, some have the wrong bolts installed. normally this cost is passed on, but this time ??
I've never been able to make that exact cross. Would you mind patching me the NAPA p/n so I can "compare the two"??
Are you trying to cross a Cleveland part number to a Timken? I’ve found that to be next to impossible. Once upon a time I found a parts list for wheel bearings that had Timken part numbers on it and what wheels they fit but haven’t been able to find it again. I think it was McFarlane that had the list.
Anyway, the easiest way is to get the wheel off and look at the part numbers on the bearings and races. Timken doesn’t change them when they become an airplane part. Your local bearing shop should be able to give you a hand from there.
What I’ve found interesting is that there is maybe a $2 difference between the PMA marked parts and what you find at the parts stores. Hardly worth the effort.
nope,, wrong againdon't need to....the heads are marked.
Wrong... Cessna use a KOYO bearing.You do need to be careful. Timken does have PMA and non-PMA bearings of the same part number. The PMA ones have the suffix "20629" added. Supposedly they have been through additional QA steps.
For me, if the IPC shows a 13889 wheel bearing, I am good going to NAPA. That is what Cessna engineers designed and used before PMA was around.
So....maybe you have the wrong part.nope,, wrong again
22537 has no markings specific bolt. AN960- has no marks at all
So, that's a part number ?View attachment 63893 Item #11. Looks Timken-ish to me.
Do you know the difference between a OEM Cessna wheel and a Cleveland?
What I’ve found interesting is that there is maybe a $2 difference between the PMA marked parts and what you find at the parts stores. Hardly worth the effort.
So, that's a part number ?