I would not call any aerobatic rated airplane "boring", whether it has 65 HP or no engine at all.
Maybe not boring, but it can be annoying taking forever to climb to an altitude where you have enough energy to give up to do some aerobatics.
I would not call any aerobatic rated airplane "boring", whether it has 65 HP or no engine at all.
Maybe not boring, but it can be annoying taking forever to climb to an altitude where you have enough energy to give up to do some aerobatics.
This would be my pick.
Even if it's a bit homely looking, it's a great performing plane.
Didn't go through the whole thread.
Anybody throw out a Tri-pacer?
He wants a taildragger. Would a untri'ed Tri Pacer fit in his budget?
Either that or an original PA-20.
There are some PA22's out there running on Univair STC-SA45RM tailwheel conversion, but I don't know what they cost.
They're called PA22/20's
Yep, they're pretty much the same thing and from what I see sell for the same price for similar condition. That looks like the one over at N Perry.
I've heard them referred to as "a poor man's 172".
They have pretty good speed and load lift for what they are.
A Rans S7 would not be affordable for 30 grand. They run 55-70 grand in good shape with 500 hrs. Or so. VERY nice airplane.