superdad
Pre-takeoff checklist
Anyone know where I can get the TW endorsement in or around Nebraska? I have did a google search but came up with nothing, Also do you think it would be a good endorsement to get if I don't have access to a TW?
Then why do you want to get it?
Then why do you want to get it?
...Also do you think it would be a good endorsement to get if I don't have access to a TW?
Anyone know where I can get the TW endorsement in or around Nebraska
Anyone know where I can get the TW endorsement in or around Nebraska? I have did a google search but came up with nothing, Also do you think it would be a good endorsement to get if I don't have access to a TW?
I would not recommend spending the money unless you have a need for the endorsement. Spend it on more training that makes you better flying what you do fly.
If you're not going to fly a TW ever again, I can't see the use in it, but it will make you a better pilot ... for a little while. :wink2:
I would be surprised if nothing is available in Nebraska, but one state to your east, in Iowa, there are several places. Here are two:
A club near Cedar Rapids, with an Aeronca Chief and instructors, where I am learning:
http://www.greencastleaeroclub.com
It is not costly to join for a while and we would be happy to have you.
An FBO in Pella with a rental cub and CFI
flyclassicaviation.com
You could ask whether the CFI can concentrate the lessons into a few days. I think insurance requires a certain number of hours of dual instruction before you can solo.
This is exactly why a Tailwheel Training is worth the investment. It will "make you better flying what you do fly".
The big push with the FAA Safety folks now is Loss Of Control accidents. These mostly stem from poor stick and rudder skills.
Almost everyone I train comments on how their stick and rudder skills have improved in what ever they normally fly(this applies to brand new PPLs and ATPs with 10s of thousands of hours).
It could be argued that flying a trike to the same discipline standards that are required in a Conventional Gear aircraft would result in the same improvement in S&R skills. The problem is that there is no real feedback in a trike to show when you do something sloppy.
It is not just the ground handling portion of the flight that is improved, but takeoffs and landing routinely improve in whatever you fly because of the extra discipline required in a Tailwheel AC, especially attitude control and airspeed control.
If you routinely fly a Conventional Gear AC chances are you don't understand how flying a trike promotes bad discipline habits. If you routinely fly a trike chances are good you have developed some bad habits. I know this is a generalization, but this is what I have observed in the pilots with whom I fly.
Why don't you want to get it?
I know I saw a huge improvement in my airspeed control when I started flying tailwheel, and I figured out what my feet are for. It teaches you to truly utilize all flight controls, and learn how they all can interact.
I still have to come up and visit Ron, I trust you got moved in okay at Lebanon?
I know I saw a huge improvement in my airspeed control when I started flying tailwheel, and I figured out what my feet are for. It teaches you to truly utilize all flight controls, and learn how they all can interact.
I still have to come up and visit Ron, I trust you got moved in okay at Lebanon?
... But again at the cost of 2k plus I could put that towards my plane fund and then buy one and train in it.
You don't need a Tailwheel plane for either of those. In flight there is no difference. Having a tailwheel does nothing to magically impart this wisdom upon you.
All a Tailwheel does is introduces more risk that you have to manage, that's all.
All very good control maneuvers, but still cannot produce the level of accurate instinctive control touch and responses required to stay on centerline.practice slow flight with the stall horn screaming at you. Climb, sink, turn, all of it with the screaming, and when the engine starts to get hot, pull the throttle and do a 3000' falling leaf stall.
Learning obscure techniques in a plane you will never fly is a poor use of your aviation resources.
I still have to come up and visit Ron, I trust you got moved in okay at Lebanon?
All very good control maneuvers, but still cannot produce the level of accurate instinctive control touch and responses required to stay on centerline.
Obscure?
If you can keep the wings +/-5° in a falling leaf, you have all the rudder skills to make the plane do whatever you'll ever need.
The notion that the tailwheel teaches you anything is absurd. All it points out is how crappy your primary instruction was.
What motivation does anyone have to criticize a guy for wanting a taildragger endorsement? If you want it, go get it. Get a seaplane rating, too, if it makes you happy. Why wouldn't you want to be the best, most rounded pilot you can be?
I agree and disagree with you. I do think those skills can be learned in a Tri gear airplane, through the methods you mentioned.
BUT, I think a taildragger makes the effects of proper technique much more pronounced. It makes it easier for a pilot to see the flaws in their technique due to the more pronounced ground handling and how the proper techniques effect an airplane. A taildragger doesn't cover up sloppy piloting.
Please, someone exlplain to me where a tailwheel makes any difference unless you're touching the ground. I have over 1000hrs with tailwheels including various small and big AG planes, some with over 1000hp, Lot's of pipeline in a PA-12, some Pitts, some Extra, some Citabria/Decathalon, I even have ME tailwheel time....
The only times I notice any difference is when the wheels are on the ground, and that's what, 10 seconds out of every flight? Heck, if you're a half assed stable pilot, you can be way sloppy with your energy, because if you have too much, no worries, make a wheel landing and drive it on.