K
KennyFlys
Guest
Re: Straight Ins
Folks, you're not gonna sell me on this one. Also, you shouldn't be doing turning descents before entering the pattern. Last, there are only two suggested directions to leave the pattern. Down wind isn't one of them.
Come on down to Conroe, TX and fly in the pattern for a week with our Indian students from down the end of the field. Let's see if you don't push for a standard?Not only does it not violate the standards in the AIM, straight-ins are encouraged by the regulations. Read Deakin's AvWeb column which discusses the regulations: http://www.avweb.com/news/pelican/182100-1.html
Personally I have found in my 44 years of flying that straight-ins generally offer an increased level of safety to everyone in the pattern. First, exposure time for you and potentially conflicting traffic is absolutely minimized. Second, turns and turning descents are eliminated, and you can concentrate your traffic scan primarily in one area. Third, potentially conflicting aircraft will be oriented in a maximum visibility fashion for you, turning downwind to base and in profile, probably above or at worst at your altitude. Fourth, exposure to traffic departing the pattern in any direction is virtually eliminated.
Courtesy and common sense should always be used. The straight-in should begin more than 3 miles from the runway, with appropriate radio calls. There are traffic conditions which make the use of a straight-in inadvisable, but I find them the exception rather than the rule.
Folks, you're not gonna sell me on this one. Also, you shouldn't be doing turning descents before entering the pattern. Last, there are only two suggested directions to leave the pattern. Down wind isn't one of them.