Very true. But, maybe one of the pre-converted ones could work, and you could do some excellent customizations I'm sure. The platform is a good one anyway!
That's more or less what we're leaning towards at the moment - one of the larger proper bus RVs that has had a conversion done, but that we could then update/customize as needed. However it would need to be one that started out good and not one that's junk.
Interesting. There's not a ton of difference between the 9s and the A-series. The "102" is merely the width in inches of several series, so you may be thinking some of the later ones. The B and C series were the first ones that you could just get painted sides instead of stainless.
What is it you like about the older ones or dislike about the newer ones? I prefer the 9 and later myself, but mainly I think it's because the 8 still has the bump in the top cap that hints at the old buses that had the "upper windshield" and that makes them look really old to me. But I spent some of the best years of my life riding around in an 8.
Just call it personal preference. I'm not a fan of most of the 80s/early 90s blocky/pixelated kind of looks, and to me that's what the square headlight MCI-9s and the A-series have. I actually don't mind the older looking busses (although I prefer the 4-headlight ones). The Silver Eagles look cool, although the ones that have been converted to 102s from 96s hurt the aesthetics some, as do the raised roof ones, and I suspect that without those features the interior space is going to be notably lacking. There's one Silver Eagle close to us that we like and might go check out, although it's not currently our top choice. Oh, and it's an 8V92, non-turbo, no Jakes. So several negatives. However it's been very nicely redone from the pictures, we wouldn't need to do much on the interior.
I remember riding in the 9s and the A-series as a kid, too, taking the bus out to Long Island and other destinations. I remember the OTR AC being broken on one ride in a very hot summer. LOL
When it comes to the big busses, the Silver Eagles I think look cool but are least practical. The Prevost is my favorite overall on styling, but the pricing matches. The MCIs I don't like as much, but ultimately if the rest of the bus is good, then that matters more.
And we may also get in some of these full on busses with no slides and go "Nope, want the slide."
You're a hard man to please!
I didn't realize MCI ever used a 12-cylinder, but I was never in charge of anything older than an 8. It sounds like the MC-6/12V71 combo would be right up your alley, but VERY hard to find as 85 of the 100 MC-6s built were re-engined and only the 15 Canadian ones kept their 12V71s according to this article:
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/bus...supercrusier-a-big-bruiser-ahead-of-its-time/
Yeah, I've only seen (on YouTube) one of the 6s with the V12s. Those were also smaller than we'd want, so really not a good choice.
The 92 series engines are also not my choice, which is a bit of a rough spot to be in since that's what most of the things have. Don't like the 6V92 sound, the 8V92s sound ok, but all 92s use wet liners with O-rings (which can deteriorate) and are harder on the rod bearings. I'm certainly no expert, but watching Bus Grease Monkey on YouTube (one of my favorite channels) he recommends doing 92 rod bearings every 100k, and when he pulls them it seems like they normally need it. Maybe he recommends all the bearings, I forget. Anyway, the 71 series seems to be more tolerant.
But really, I'm not going to quibble over the engine type anything we look at has. I'd be more concerned about an exhaust brake of some sort, be it proper Jakes or just an exhaust flapper like
@denverpilot had on his Ram. We'll plan mountain trips where we'll definitely want them. Jakes can be added but it's harder to do so really, prefer to have something that already has it, at least on a 2-stroke since you can't effectively use a flapper on the exhaust with the 2-strokes, all it'll do is block off the air from the blower, which isn't going to do you much.