Matthew
Touchdown! Greaser!
That pilot was a tool.^^^^This. Spot on.
It is like blaming a gun for a murder. Look at the person operating the tool, not the tool.
That pilot was a tool.^^^^This. Spot on.
It is like blaming a gun for a murder. Look at the person operating the tool, not the tool.
Just saw an update on Austin Hatch this morning on ESPN.... Check out the link. Good to see someone start a recovery from what they have been through.
http://espn.go.com/espnw/athletes-l...r-two-plane-crashes-scores-one-glorious-point
Great story, what a tough way to begin your adult life! I hope he does well!
I have not gone back and completely studied the NTSB report, so some of these details may be wrong, but he initially filed to SMD to N98, but diverted to BFA due to bad weather. There is no indication in the report what the weather was predicted at the time he filed, or departed. There is no indication what the weather was observed or predicted at BFA at the time he diverted. The weather at BFA wasn't good, so he diverted again. At that time, the weather was broken at 400, overcast at 700. I don't know what other options were. Without the knowing the weather forecasts available at the time for his destinations, we can't know what he should have known.
That being said, looking at the route of flight, that's just a 2.5 hour flight in my plane (177B ), so he should still have had plenty of fuel in his Bonanza, I would think. On further examination, there is no reason to think he didn't have (or at least could not be expected to have had) plenty of fuel available.
Since there is no weather available at BFA, it cannot be filed/used as an alternate airport --- he should have never diverted to BFA in the first place.
You make some excellent points in the entirety of your post. A question about the quoted statement above:
I understand you cannot file those as alternatives, given they are listed as Alternate N/A. Is there anything necessarily wrong about diverting to them to see what they look like if you have the fuel to get to an appropriate alternate?
Regardless of fuel (which he had plenty), pilots gets tired in emergency or bad weather situations very quickly --- like pizza delivery, it's 30 minutes or less. By diverting to BFA (without knowing the weather), he basically used up all his concentration and energy.
While I know that all approaches at airports without weather reporting are normally marked A-NA, and the regulations prohibit filing an airport with A-NA on the approach chart based on that approach, I'm not familiar with the FAA regulation which says it's not legal to divert to that airport and fly that approach just because there's no weather reporting. Can you point it out to me?I am quite surprised nobody has pointed this out yet --- both N98 and BFA have no tower and no weather. CVX has no tower but has weather. All 3 airports have special takeoff minimum or ODP. Since there is no weather available at BFA, it cannot be filed/used as an alternate airport...
While I know that all approaches at airports without weather reporting are normally marked A-NA, and the regulations prohibit filing an airport with A-NA on the approach chart based on that approach, I'm not familiar with the FAA regulation which says it's not legal to divert to that airport and fly that approach just because there's no weather reporting. Can you point it out to me?
135.213 Weather reports and forecasts.
(a) Whenever a person operating an aircraft under this part is required to use a weather report or forecast, that person shall use that of the U.S. National Weather Service, a source approved by the U.S. National Weather Service, or a source approved by the Administrator. However, for operations under VFR, the pilot in command may, if such a report is not available, use weather information based on that pilot's own observations or on those of other persons competent to supply appropriate observations.
(b) For the purposes of paragraph (a) of this section, weather observations made and furnished to pilots to conduct IFR operations at an airport must be taken at the airport where those IFR operations are conducted, unless the Administrator issues operations specifications allowing the use of weather observations taken at a location not at the airport where the IFR operations are conducted. The Administrator issues such operations specifications when, after investigation by the U.S. National Weather Service and the certificate-holding district office, it is found that the standards of safety for that operation would allow the deviation from this paragraph for a particular operation for which an air carrier operating certificate or operating certificate has been issued.
Not only that, Part 91 (under which the pilot under discussion was operating) has no requirement for weather reporting at a diversion airport even if airports without weather reporting have restrictions for filing as alternates. But that doesn't change the fact that, as you said, the pilot under discussion made a whole string of really bad decisions on each fatal flight.Yea, I was thinking about 135, Part 91 can shoot approaches in zero zero all day long.