Sweet. I was practicing landing in a turn in the Luscombe and got some very strange looks. Here Brian Lansburgh shows you how it is done.
Blocked in the US due to copyright issues.
Sweet. I was practicing landing in a turn in the Luscombe and got some very strange looks. Here Brian Lansburgh shows you how it is done.
I've watched it before - and just watched it again. I think Detroit is still part of the U.S. (Actually, I'm 2 miles from the city limit at the moment, but...)Blocked in the US due to copyright issues.
Blocked in the US due to copyright issues.
Seems to be only if you watch it on a phone. I am watching it in Miami McD on my laptop.
Intersect, overlap? H'm.
I've watched it before - and just watched it again. I think Detroit is still part of the U.S. (Actually, I'm 2 miles from the city limit at the moment, but...)
Their hand propping video is fun too. It includes tossing a chicken (already dead) through a prop.
I think I flew a dozen different airplanes and a half-dozen types during PP-SEL training.Can I ask how many different planes a student pilot gets to fly? I'd wager maybe two but mostly just the one?
Draw it out, shadows intersecting or overlapping makes no sense. It only makes sense if you think "his shadow can't touch my airplane (not my airplane's shadow) and my shadow can't touch his airplane." Seems less a tip than a useless and silly crutch.
I'm pretty sure this next tip will not generate yet another "TEH IZ STOOPID" remark from the peanut gallery, filtered for your refreshment.
One thing that helped me a bunch was getting my instructor to make a table of specific pitch and power settings for every configuration in normal flight and then I memorized them.
The thinking is that for each particular pitch and power setting, you will get the same airspeed and rate of climb or descent. You can climb, descend, and fly straight and level, using a particular power setting and a visual reference where the nose appears relative to the horizon. Doing it the same way every time without ever thinking about it. Frees up some RAM.
And now, gallery? Pick that apart.
In the few times I've done it, it was to judge if I was clear of another aircraft as I taxiied past. Every time I've tried it, it worked. YMMV.
And now, gallery? Pick that apart.
Sweet. I was practicing landing in a turn in the Luscombe and got some very strange looks. Here Brian Lansburgh shows you how it is done.
The first time you encounter rising air, that's going to scare the **** out of you.
...
I've done a Vno climb in a 172. Just once. How does that fit into your "tip?".
Does this invalidate anything I said about pitch and power producing a certain performance? If so, how?
No it does not, but my CFI has told me many many times that any speed, and any power, can be used for any type of flight as long as you follow the basic rules: pitch, power, then trim so you get the desired results. If charts help you great, everyone learns differently. My training is concentrating on feeling the controls, listening to the engine, looking out the window, glancing at the instruments on occasion. Really knowing what the plane is telling you, and situational awareness.
which pretty much means a certain pitch and a certain power combination will always give you a certain performance.
Umm no. There is plenty of sinking air out there at velocities greater then the best rate of climb on GA airplanes. Watcha gonna do when you pitch and power for best ROC and find yourself descending? Deny reality? But my instructor said...
Knee-jerk contrarians are so tiresome. OK, you go find your "sinking air" and the rest of us--and our instructors--will fly in the 99.9% of normal air where pitch + power = performance.
You're everyone's problem. That's because every time you go up in the air, you're unsafe. I don't like you because you're dangerous.
Any power? Including no power?
Just pulling your leg of course and picking those nits ... the key phrase in your comment is "as long as you follow the basic rules" which pretty much means a certain pitch and a certain power combination will always give you a certain performance.
Well, the Asiana crew came up short (literally) in at least one of those areas - probably more.
Best to remember that the PIC had over 12,000 hours, which I'm sure included all of the requisite proficiency checks.
As an aside, ValueJet had to change its name after it became a prefix to the word "crash". I wonder if Asiana will have to do so as well.
I'm pretty sure this next tip will not generate yet another "TEH IZ STOOPID" remark from the peanut gallery, filtered for your refreshment.
One thing that helped me a bunch was getting my instructor to make a table of specific pitch and power settings for every configuration in normal flight and then I memorized them.
The thinking is that for each particular pitch and power setting, you will get the same airspeed and rate of climb or descent. You can climb, descend, and fly straight and level, using a particular power setting and a visual reference where the nose appears relative to the horizon. Doing it the same way every time without ever thinking about it. Frees up some RAM.
And now, gallery? Pick that apart.
Knee-jerk contrarians are so tiresome. OK, you go find your "sinking air" and the rest of us--and our instructors--will fly in the 99.9% of normal air where pitch + power = performance.
You're from Boise, which leads me to believe at some point you might be exposed to some mountain waves. I'd listen to the more experienced pilots on this board.... (not talking about myself -- I'm just a student)
I'm pretty sure this next tip will not generate yet another "TEH IZ STOOPID" remark from the peanut gallery, filtered for your refreshment.
One thing that helped me a bunch was getting my instructor to make a table of specific pitch and power settings for every configuration in normal flight and then I memorized them.
The thinking is that for each particular pitch and power setting, you will get the same airspeed and rate of climb or descent. You can climb, descend, and fly straight and level, using a particular power setting and a visual reference where the nose appears relative to the horizon. Doing it the same way every time without ever thinking about it. Frees up some RAM.
And now, gallery? Pick that apart.
So, which combination of pitch and power will give you a Vno climb? Pick your favorite trainer and be specific.
I've done this. Understand how, and maybe you'll find the limitations of your "tip." Hint: "Always" isn't even close.
You seem to have a tendency for wild generalizations. Please tell me you're a student pilot who is still trying to figure things out. Almost all of your tips have been wrong.
You're from Boise, which leads me to believe at some point you might be exposed to some mountain waves. I'd listen to the more experienced pilots on this board.... (not talking about myself -- I'm just a student)
Why didn't you do the flight tests and make your own table? You realize that none of this stuff is fixed in a small plane right? Everything is variable with load.
Henning?! You mean that it is POSSIBLE to make a table of performance figures for your aircraft??!! WHAT ABOUT TEH MOUNTAIN WAVE AND Vno climbs and SEEEEENKING AIR??!
edit: Another fellow brought up the thing about the sun's rays being parallel. That is a more cogent response and one that gives me food for thought. I see where he is going there but again we have to assume that both shadows are visible to you from the cockpit and also not obscured by the airframe of either aircraft.
I think that was me.
All true.
Taught to me when learning in high wing trainers in S FL, so both shadows were usually visible on sunny days.
And my current Sky Arrow is high wing, so works there as well.
I think my rule-of-thumb would be: "If you can see both shadows, then if the shadows do not touch then the items in question will not touch".
Now, the inverse is not necessary true. The shadows may touch and you can still clear the object by going over or under it. But if at the same level, watch out!
That's good practice and certainly something you will want to have down cold for your instrument rating. I do agree with Henning, that this is something you do on your own.
You are mistaken if you think I want to pick everything you say apart. That is a straw man response and saves you the trouble of actually considering what I and at least one other said about shadows or responding to it with other than a "it worked for me" quip.
edit: Another fellow brought up the thing about the sun's rays being parallel. That is a more cogent response and one that gives me food for thought. I see where he is going there but again we have to assume that both shadows are visible to you from the cockpit and also not obscured by the airframe of either aircraft.
Well, for a student pilot coming on a board and asking about tips, you sure have come out with a **** attitude. They are completely different issues. With that, I am done with one final question, "what recip plane will climb at Vno?"
I'm pretty sure this next tip will not generate yet another "TEH IZ STOOPID" remark from the peanut gallery, filtered for your refreshment.
One thing that helped me a bunch was getting my instructor to make a table of specific pitch and power settings for every configuration in normal flight and then I memorized them.
The thinking is that for each particular pitch and power setting, you will get the same airspeed and rate of climb or descent. You can climb, descend, and fly straight and level, using a particular power setting and a visual reference where the nose appears relative to the horizon. Doing it the same way every time without ever thinking about it. Frees up some RAM.
And now, gallery? Pick that apart.
Ah come on, Henning. I'm asking for tips. Every time I've gotten one, I've thanked the person, including you and profusely. Every time I've given a tip that I've learned from more experienced CFIs, there's been one or another person going off on how stupid the tip is and how it's too generalized, blah, blah.
If Henning with all that experience agrees that generating a performance table can be a good thing, well then it goes towards validating that tip in spite of the tiny exceptions to the rule.
Are people completely off their rockers on this board? Yes, mountain waves--you know, the ones they warn you about, and to stay away from if possible BECAUSE THEY ARE DANGEROUS? It STILL does not invalidate my tip about getting performance numbers for your aircraft.
Listen, there are flight regimes that will invalidate ANY generalized rule about flying. If you overload the aircraft, you're now a conducting a flight test and strange things may happen to you, up to and including getting killed. Pointing out "hey, WHAT ABOUT WHEN YOU'RE OVERLOADED?!! HMMMM???" to invalidate a general point is ridiculous and bordering on manic.