flyingcheesehead
Touchdown! Greaser!
I drive maybe half that, even less with WFH due to COVID. I have a 2016 that just turned 36,000 miles; I bought it a year old with ~4,200 miles on it.
I didn't get a ticket, but when I first bought the BMW 328i Coupe I had several years ago I had a similar acceleration experience. I'd moved up from an econocar. I accelerated and looked down and saw the needle quickly moving past 90 mph. 90?! And quickly backed off the accelerator. Sheesh that car would accelerate.
Once nice preference you can set on the Teslas is for it to chime as you're blowing through the speed limit.
I am thinking of getting an EV for my next car. Right now I'm stilling enjoying my Mustang convertible with a manual transmission too much.
Y'know, I went straight from a stick shift to electric... But I still drive it like a stick, switching between N, D, and L to get the amount of regen I want at any given time.
That's one of the things I'm a bit apprehensive with about the Tesla. The shifter is up on a stalk, not right at hand when you've got your right arm on the armrest like all of my electrified vehicles except the i3 have been. The Bolt even added the additional regen paddle which was kinda fun and video game-ish. I guess we'll see what it's like.
We tend to fly if we need to go very far though; private or commercial. So the impractical part of the Mustang is not too big of a deal. Flying means that super long range in an EV isn't that big of a deal either.
Bingo. If it's over 100 miles away from home, I'm almost certainly taking the plane. I've literally not driven more than 250 miles from home in the last decade.
Right now I'm leaning towards the Kia Niro EV.
That's one that was near the top of my list in this process. I saw one in the wild for the first time in Oregon a few weeks ago when I was out there visiting my brother. I like the look, and it didn't have the problematic LG pouch cells.
I took a brief drive in a friend's new M3. I think I could get used to the goofiness of the accelerator pedal wanting to also be a brake pedal, but having to turn my head away from the road in order to read the central display panel is a complete disqualifier. Many cars have central displays but to my knowledge all of them also have critical information, like speed, directly in front of the driver.
When I rented a Model 3, I honestly didn't even notice it. I didn't have to turn my head at all, nor do I tilt my head down when looking into the dash on other cars. It's a glance, it's just in a slightly different direction. It wasn't any harder than switching between a yoke and a stick in an airplane, which, at least for me, feels perfectly natural either way.
Are there any electric cars that don't suck that don't use liquid cooled/ heated batteries? The leaf is the only one I know of that's an actual car, not a "neighborhood vehicle", and last I heard the battery life is lousy. When I first heard of a liquid cooled battery, I thought it sounded like a terrible idea, but it certainly appears to to a necessity with the current chemistry. I was really concerned about buying the first Pacifica, thinking the battery would degrade rapidly after a couple years like a phone, but it held up quite well, and from what I read the older volts and teslas have surprisingly little loss in range.
I wouldn't recommend air-cooled batteries, at least on a fully electric vehicle. Heat is one of the top killers of Lithium batteries, and Nissan's air-cooled system on the Leaf is one of the worst as far as degradation. They've had to replace a ton of batteries under warranty, and they're the only manufacturer where I've heard of that being a widespread problem.
On a PHEV it's more okay to air-cool if it's otherwise got a good battery management system, as there isn't the same level of power that you get from a purely electric vehicle, and thus there isn't as much heat to dissipate/spread.
Older Volts and Teslas have surprisingly little loss in range because they both use liquid-cooled batteries.