Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2008
- Messages
- 16,022
- Location
- DXO124009
- Display Name
Display name:
Light and Sporty Guy
Capt. Thorpe,
Your "simple fact" is simply not based on facts. LSAs are not "falling from the sky" and LSA accidents due to medical issues that would have been detected by a flight surgeon haven't just been statistically insignificant... there haven't been any.
Before you make blanket statements, I suggest you review the LSA safety studies the folks at Aviation Safety (and other flying magazines) have done over the last three years. The accident rate for LSAs has been higher than that of certified GA single engine piston aircraft. Take out a few trouble-prone models, and that rate drops to being only slightly higher... and the majority of the accidents that make that accident rate slightly higher are comparatively minor RLOC, collapsed nose gears due to hard landings etc.
One thing that has stood out in all of the safety reviews is that newly minted Sport Pilots have a better safety record than experienced Private Pilots "trading down" to LSAs. Those who approach LSAs with a "Hell, I've flown ____________ and __________ (fill in the blanks) for years... flying this little thing will be a piece of cake" attitude quickly find out that LSAs can be much less forgiving if one's (actual) "stick and rudder skills" are rusty or if one flares even a bit too high on landing and runs out of energy.
Finally, the legacy LSAs in your chart are not representative of the fleet as a whole -- you need to include the modern composite and aluminum LSAs sold by Flight Design, Jabiru, Tecnam and the like as well as the modern interpretations of the classics by CubCrafters, Rans, etc.
Ok, did you actually read what I wrote, or did you stop at the first sarcastic sentence?
Did you notice that I pointed out that the current accident rate is almost half of what it was in the 80's?
Did you notice that the data presented shows that the number of accidents per year did not increase when the sport pilot rule was enacted (the big vertical line on the graph) for the same population of aircraft?
Did you notice that the graph provides a comparison of before vs. after? And showed that for the SAME airplane, there is no significant increase in the annual accident rate? How can you show that comparison with S-LSA aircraft that were not around in significant numbers before the LSA rules?
As someone pointed out, the annual accident rate corresponds strongly to economic conditions - not to the change in medical requirements. (Non-LSA aircraft show the same trends).