Tight/strict budget, is almost always, mutually exclusive with flying, in General aviation.
Cheers
I dont even get the idea of a tight budget, in the sense that even if one (prematurely, when they only have done the minimum required, even if they pass) gets their certificate, they will have continued expenses with renting, or worse budgeting to buy, a plane. Isnt it the same in the US thaT most instruction vs. cost of plane rental is relatively inexpensive?
And then you have the other thing. Im a student. I want, actually need, to know that I am competent and have drilled in as much as posible with however ling it takes me to get my PPL, that I have flown in differrent kinds of weather, situations, made mistakes that "sit" with me after my CFI lets me know I just almost created a bad situation. I need to get as much experience and it simply is of a nature that i dont believe it can be gotten with one or two, three or four, times.
Maybe im just slow, but my attitude is i need to learn, forget some of what I learned (we al l do this) and relearn. I have to also learn what not to do, specially instincts (like the well known dont use the rudder to "help" you turn final" and many more i have never heard of yet) and know why those things can cause accidents, why the instinct is wrong.
Im 60. Have learned many things that took time, and never have had it be that the shortest is best when learning something (guitar, norwegian language, etc.) and it is even more so in an airplane. More critical.
Less room for error. Im american, and also grew up seeing books touting "learn a foreign language in 60 days" the bookshelves of bookstores filled with the promise of fluency/expertise in short time. They lie.
Sorry for the long post, i just reslly dont get it. And again, the costs keep going (the budget) after PPL so why the rush? Not a lecture, but i just dont get it.
For me it would be a conflict of interest (self interest) because it might color my objectivity on my skills or need to keep training on some things.