poadeleted21
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2011
- Messages
- 12,332
You'd see a private industry pop up. Its already happening here. I'm not losing much sleep.
Sign the Petition to Save the Most Important Towered Fields
- Thread starter Jps19602002@mac.com
- Start date
You'd see a private industry pop up. Its already happening here. I'm not losing much sleep.
Let's see....the 3 towers in the Denver area that are on the hit list (BJC & FTG to close, APA to cut overnight) are all under Class B. The area around BJC is one of the busiest training areas in the country, APA is one of the top 3 busiest GA airports in the country (mostly jets and high-end pistons), there are at least 10 schools among the 3 airports, 7 runways, plus there are another 5 non-towered airports in the vicinity, all with schools. And let's not forget Buckley AFB, USAF Academy and KPUB with USAF Initial Pilot training.
3 or 4 in the pattern? That's midnight at APA, a incredibly slow day on the weekend at any other airport around here. Guess what? Everyone learns to see & avoid and deal with Class B and all the other traffic regardless of the day of the week.
1600vw
Pattern Altitude
I heard a man speak from " Home Land Security" before it was the TSA, he said certain things where going to be baned.
GA airplanes, Ultralights, RC anything land and air, it seemed to me he spoke of a couple other things, its been to long and I do not remember.
I told him he was nuts..He said just wait.
He said it would happen in the name of...Home land security...
roncachamp
Final Approach
Doubtful.
What do you mean by "centered"? There are TRACONs that aren't located on airports and TRACONs on airports where the tower and TRACON are run as separate facilities.
roncachamp
Final Approach
As long as they also stop collecting taxes at these airports, fine.
That battle has nothing to do with sequestration. Some politicians want to close airports that do have commercial services.
Ted
The pilot formerly known as Twin Engine Ted
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2007
- Messages
- 30,019
- Display Name
Display name:
iFlyNothing
The slippery slope mentality doesn't work here. The move to close airports is largely because it is believed the economic benefit of a new mall, etc outweighs the benefit of the airport.
A tower closure is not the same as the closure of an airport. Since the vast majority of airports lack towers, including some very busy ones, it doesn't hold water that a tower closure means the airport follows.
A tower closure is not the same as the closure of an airport. Since the vast majority of airports lack towers, including some very busy ones, it doesn't hold water that a tower closure means the airport follows.
ColoPilot
Line Up and Wait
I'm not saying closing the tower means closing the airport. It's more once you start looking at cutting the aviation infrastructure, the next step might be to close airports -- especially those with less than 20-30 operations a day. I also realize the federal government can't close these airports directly, but they can eliminate the FAA grants that provide runway funds etc.
I was just surprised how many pilots on this board seem to be happy with towers being closed without any concern about what might be next....
ColoPilot
Line Up and Wait
Ted
The pilot formerly known as Twin Engine Ted
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2007
- Messages
- 30,019
- Display Name
Display name:
iFlyNothing
Again, the slippery slope mentality doesn't work. We need to cut budgets, and towers are a logical place to do so. It's not a case of "what's next" so much as understanding the difference between a logical budget cut and an illogical one.
We see attempts to close airports all the time, and have for years. You see an almost universal response here to combat that. This varies from signing petitions to one family actually buying an airport and keeping it open with their own money. This has been going on for years, and I don't expect to see that changing.
There is more than just federal money at airports. You have fuel sales (which small airports often can attract with low self-serve prices) and local governments that want keep their municipal airports open. We all know closures occur, and they will continue to do so. But we also must do our part to not try to mooch off the government and make the problem else. We're in this situation because everyone said "What about ME?"
Ted
The pilot formerly known as Twin Engine Ted
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2007
- Messages
- 30,019
- Display Name
Display name:
iFlyNothing
Backwards. Needs over 99,000 more signatures.
EdFred
Taxi to Parking
You have that number backwards. The number of signatures when I looked is 623. The number needed is 99,377.
roncachamp
Final Approach
So the state/county/city will have to fund it themselves. I'm okay with that too.
On the contrary, I am very concerned with what might be next. I'm concerned that if we do not cut federal spending the nation will someday be referred to as the former United States of America, much like we now refer to the USSR.
schmookeeg
En-Route
I would think the economic *activity* of a Mall would vastly overshadow that of an airport. I don't know how to quantify the benefit of having small airports around.
I'd be interested to know if there is data on this.
nddons
Touchdown! Greaser!
Bill Watson
En-Route
I flew into KFAY a couple of days ago...pretty quiet place. Had ATC problems getting out of there but I chalked it up to training.
My rule of thumb is that ATC quality and proficiency is proportional to the traffic. Busy ops are good, sleepy is sleepy. It's just the nature of work.
Anyway, are there any regulatory requirements for an operating control tower? Do Part 121 ops (scheduled) require a control tower? Some of the slowest Class D ops seem to coincide with scheduled ops. I assume that part 135 ops (commuter?) do not.
Just asking..
Ted
The pilot formerly known as Twin Engine Ted
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2007
- Messages
- 30,019
- Display Name
Display name:
iFlyNothing
135 ops do not require a control tower, which was fortunate since we were based at a non-towered field and almost exclusively flew to non-towered fields.
I know that Piedmont (flying Dash 8s, assumed 121) had flights into non-towered fields in Pennsylvania. So I don't see there to be any regulation about it, although that is often used as justification. Interestingly at Williamsport, though, the first flight of the day left before tower opened.
Bill Watson
En-Route
I'm flying into Williamsport later this month to spend some time in Lycoming engine school. I expect a very quiet airport and I'm bringing my fly rod.
Ted
The pilot formerly known as Twin Engine Ted
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2007
- Messages
- 30,019
- Display Name
Display name:
iFlyNothing
Well, I know pretty much everybody there. And yes, it is a very quiet airport.
I think Jim Doebler is still teaching the class. He does a good job with it, although his speech on LOP is pretty funny if you understand what's actually occuring vs what he says. He may have changed it in 7 years, but I doubt it.
You'll enjoy the plant tour. Neat halls to walk down.
Ted
The pilot formerly known as Twin Engine Ted
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2007
- Messages
- 30,019
- Display Name
Display name:
iFlyNothing
Oh, and if there's a guy in the tower who sounds like someone's ****ed in his Cheerios for the past 10 years, make sure to bug him by calling in any "S" as "Sugar" instead of Sierra. 
Bill Watson
En-Route
I'll be looking forward to the LOP pitch since I've been doing the whole injector balancing LOP routine with my RV10. I'm guessing that the factory treats the whole subject like exposure to a toxic substance.
Ted
The pilot formerly known as Twin Engine Ted
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2007
- Messages
- 30,019
- Display Name
Display name:
iFlyNothing
Well, if you're in Durham next week perhaps we could get together some evening and chat about it. I have to be there all week for work.
roncachamp
Final Approach
I don't see why an airport and a new mall would necessarily be mutually exclusive.
roncachamp
Final Approach
No, there are nontowered airports with scheduled Part 121 operations.
Eagle I
Pre-takeoff checklist
As someone who's spent the better part of a year flying at KHFD, I can say that I don't see much of a need for a tower there, although the gentlemen who staffed it were certainly always friendly and helpful, and I feel bad for the loss of their jobs. But this petition stems from a flight school who perhaps has much to lose from the loss of a tower. GA pilots in general? Not so much.
VanDy
Cleared for Takeoff
Y'all are just trying to keep the towers open so that I can't fly in NORDO and get the cheap gas and leave... I guess i could argue that having control towers limits the customer base to the maintenance providers....
azure
Final Approach
So then, that entire airspace will revert to ZAU for radar services? How low can they see in the vicinity of MKG?
I guess I meant "associated with", in the sense that the most critical part of their job is to coordinate arrivals and departures from a specific airport (like Detroit Approach and KDTW). I assumed that a TRACON associated with an airport control tower would be located on the field. Are there any TRACONs (in the Great Lakes area or anywhere else in the US) that aren't associated in any way with a towered airport?
Last edited:
EdFred
Taxi to Parking
Cheap gas at towered fields as compared to untowered? Where?
JXN does seem to be an exception.
I do believe that some of these rather busy places that will go non-towered could benefit from stricter rules on patterns and communications. Flying a base-entry nordo at 500ft in a camouflaged taildragger is ok at some sleepy strip on the prairie, at a place with 300 operations/day, intersecting runways and a mix of training and jet traffic not so much.
Last edited:
roncachamp
Final Approach
Probably, just as it does every night.
Pretty good, the Coopersville ARSR is about 13 miles southeast of KMKG.
Mizzou Approach is in Springfield but their delegated airspace is in central Missouri, I believe the radar site is somewhere between KJEF and KCOU.
Bill Watson
En-Route
That would be good. Sent PM...
Dav8or
Final Approach
And since nearly all public use airports out there now accept federal funding, how many states, counties, or cities will be willing to put in more money keep the place open? What if they doubled your tie down/hangar rent and raised the fuel prices $1 a gallon to keep the place open? Would you stay at that field? Would you continue flying?
In practice, saying you are OK with no federal funding is the same as saying you're OK with airport closures. Not that many airports out there are vibrant enough to support themselves and most states, counties, and cities aren't any better off than the US government financially. A tough case to make to a strapped local government.
Last edited:
AdamZ
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2005
- Messages
- 14,869
- Location
- Montgomery County PA
- Display Name
Display name:
Adam Zucker
Your petition does not ask for Brainard to be kept open its asks for all control towers. Perhaps Brainard is critical, it could very well be but you should limit your petition to that field, because there are some fields that are just dead.
roncachamp
Final Approach
No federal funds doesn't mean no funds. If the feds stop funding airports they'll also have to stop collecting the taxes that are the source of those funds. I would then expect the state/county/city to begin tax collecting directly. I'd also expect that without federal oversight many needed projects would become less costly and many unneeded projects wouldn't happen at all.
Dav8or
Final Approach
What makes you say that? Because that would be fair? I don't think government works that way. Once a tax, always a tax. They can argue that people operating out of the airport are still using the nation's air traffic control and they are likely flying to airports that do still receive funds. At the very least you can rest assured, the fuel taxes aren't going anywhere but up.
roncachamp
Final Approach
Logic.
There are already airports that dont receive federal funding (too close to another airport, not eligible due to ownership structure, airport owners choice). The feds still levy the excise tax on avgas sold at those airports.
Dav8or
Final Approach
Do you see any logic in the federal government and it's policies?? Sorry, but I have to disagree, if the federal funds are yanked from a particular airport, everyone will still pay the same taxes.
I will, but we'll borrow a little less from the Chinese so my kids won't have to....
Dave Krall CFII
Final Approach
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2005
- Messages
- 5,022
- Location
- Seattle WA
- Display Name
Display name:
Dave Krall CFII SEL SES, Cmcl HELI
The ~8 airport TOWERS listed in WA State are all a phenomenal waste of tax money, let them all close.
Last edited: