The traditional rule of thumb is that of every 5 stocks one is a star, one is a dog and three track the market. . .
That would mean if you buy 2 stocks, you are more likely to track or prosper than lose.
The traditional rule of thumb is that of every 5 stocks one is a star, one is a dog and three track the market. . .
See? He did the math!
Holy hell Paul, I pay LESS than a couple grand a year in property taxes. You need to come West!
It's probably more boring than Massachusetts, but we can go shooting or ask the neighbor if we can ride the horse around a bit.
Or we could "invest" some of your property tax savings in a four wheeler that goes really fast.
And even though they find ways around it regularly, we have the Colorado TABOR law that forces tax increases to be voted on by the People. The taxists claim that our society will fall apart because of it, of course. Haha.
$750/mo in property taxes. Good lord. The politicians really do own most of the population out east, don't they? I mean really OWN. That's sad.
I've done better with small secured loans. Higher ROI and doing business with a person helps me sleep at night.
The traditional rule of thumb is that of every 5 stocks one is a star, one is a dog and three track the market. . .
That would mean if you buy 2 stocks, you are more likely to track or prosper than lose.
That's ALOT of work - to find credit worthy small business and invest directly. And most small business people are pretty bad at creating things like business plans to get the business to work.
No, think more like title loans and kneecapping.
And thats what the market generally shows - almost every mutual fund is within 1 SD of the median gain . . . its HARD to outperform the hard - you have to be lucky and smart usually.
Do you own an off the grid home, Henning? Seashells even?
You want to know that will REALLY be valuable in the societal collapse? Liquor.
If you REALLY think that society will collapse buy a warehouse of all kinds of liquor. It NEVER goes bad [hard liquor] needs almost zero storage conditions - warm and even hot is ok, wont freeze in normal cold, can get wet, and its all still good inside the bottle. You'll be able to trade liquor for fuel, housing, food and all sorts of conveniences. . .
So you are betting on the effects of group psychology and mob mentality rather than investing in a product.
That's certainly a way of looking at it Henning.... I dont really use the term bet - but it's a very calculated bet... with a bit of experience behind me.
I'll make literally hundreds of trades this year and I guarantee you over HALF of them are going to lose... The way I structure my trades, I can be right only 30 % of the time and make money. 2014 I had a 44% win rate on my trades.
So every 10 times up to bat I struck out 5.5 times- but I made a decent living... food for thought
OP asked me via PM to elaborate a bit more on my short trade.. Here's a little write up for you OP and anyone else that may be interested.
Here is a 2 year chart of the SPX and the VIX (Volatility Index). Generally speaking when the markets are strong the fear is low and therefore the volatility index goes down. When the markets are in turmoil and go down, the VIX goes up.
I could go into a very boring conversation about how the vix worth but nobody would read it - so simply put - market goes up - vix goes down, vice versa.
Notice that in Chart 1. The SPX is on the left the VIX is on the right
You'll see as the market (S&P) is making highs the VIX is making lows:
[/url][/IMG]
But lately there is a divergence between the SP/VIX. As the market makes higher highs the VIX is NOT at the lows, or making lower lows. The divergence is huge...
[/url][/IMG]
SO the divergence is reason 1. Reason 2 the market is overbought (based on my opinion and technical analysis) .
Now we COULD see a small bounce off of this trendline I drew on this chart:
[/url][/IMG]
If it does bounce I don't believe it will be much as the market is losing steam. Current oil prices have helped fuel this but that's only part of the story...
My expectations are that we will be in a range of 2100 down to about 1800. If we break the trendline above, we will go and test the 1800 level. Will I be right? Who knows.. I sure don't. But its sound analysis and I am willing to put my money out there on it.
In an earlier thread I made it clear that my MAX loss was 1700 (Per contract traded - or spread traded). now that is if the market rallies and goes aboves 2100 by december.
However, my stop is right past the highs. Should we break the highs - CLOSE above the highs then I will simply cut my losses and move on.
My goal on this is to earn $1500 per contract/spread traded. For this to happen I need the market to go to the 1850 - 1800 level - which is pretty viable if we break this trendline and the volatility increases.
Best of all I have until December to be right....
The charts above are of the SPX (S&P 500 Cash) but I traded on the SPY (sometimes called SPiders) it's the ETF of the S&P. I use the SPY because the options are VERY liquid with easier and faster fills...
Hope this helps!!
And thats what the market generally shows - almost every mutual fund is within 1 SD of the median gain . . . its HARD to outperform the market - either way - you have to be lucky and smart usually.
Do you own an off the grid home, Henning? Seashells even?
You want to know that will REALLY be valuable in the societal collapse? Liquor.
If you REALLY think that society will collapse buy a warehouse of all kinds of liquor. It NEVER goes bad [hard liquor] needs almost zero storage conditions - warm and even hot is ok, wont freeze in normal cold, can get wet, and its all still good inside the bottle. You'll be able to trade liquor for fuel, housing, food and all sorts of conveniences. . .
That's certainly a way of looking at it Henning.... I dont really use the term bet - but it's a very calculated bet... with a bit of experience behind me.
I'll make literally hundreds of trades this year and I guarantee you over HALF of them are going to lose... The way I structure my trades, I can be right only 30 % of the time and make money. 2014 I had a 44% win rate on my trades.
So every 10 times up to bat I struck out 5.5 times- but I made a decent living... food for thought
Understood, but your actions in the stock market have nothing to do with actual values of market products. As a financial professional you are using psychological profiling of a group's fears under known conditions to determine market values. The fears are driven by nothing but imagination though, so there is nothing to stabilize this function. All it does is generate more money from nothing but imagination. We have too much of that already. Money is not supposed to be its own commodity for this very reason.
I used to have a broker buy whatever I did - then I changed houses and he stopped being a star . . .
its not hard to generate good returns - find good companies and hold on.
I'm a contrarian investor - I'm buying energy companies now - they're so cheap and as long as you stay out of the oil patch itself - . Oil will not remain at $45 / bbl for very long - all it takes is a little saber rattling and its back to $100. No matter what the Saudi Crown Prince may say. There is more demand for oil than there is supply in the long term.
At the end of the day you're right - time matters more than timing.
Which is why a zero load or almost zero load S&P 500 index fund is what almost everyone needs to dollar cost average into . . .
What are some of your favorite energy picks?
Better not keep it in the warehouse though, huge target. It'll be shot to hell and then set on fire long before all the liquor is gone.
Better not keep it in the warehouse though, huge target. It'll be shot to hell and then set on fire long before all the liquor is gone.
And OP, don't forget, your best investment is always in yourself. I don't know what you do or what your skills are, but if you are willing to work like hell, you'll never regret being your own boss. But don't start with a debt overhang.
That's not really true. When he wins, someone else loses.
OP asked me via PM to elaborate a bit more on my short trade.. Here's a little write up for you OP and anyone else that may be interested.
Here is a 2 year chart of the SPX and the VIX (Volatility Index). Generally speaking when the markets are strong the fear is low and therefore the volatility index goes down. When the markets are in turmoil and go down, the VIX goes up.
I could go into a very boring conversation about how the vix worth but nobody would read it - so simply put - market goes up - vix goes down, vice versa.
Notice that in Chart 1. The SPX is on the left the VIX is on the right
You'll see as the market (S&P) is making highs the VIX is making lows:
[/URL][/IMG]
But lately there is a divergence between the SP/VIX. As the market makes higher highs the VIX is NOT at the lows, or making lower lows. The divergence is huge...
[/URL][/IMG]
SO the divergence is reason 1. Reason 2 the market is overbought (based on my opinion and technical analysis) .
Now we COULD see a small bounce off of this trendline I drew on this chart:
[/URL][/IMG]
If it does bounce I don't believe it will be much as the market is losing steam. Current oil prices have helped fuel this but that's only part of the story...
My expectations are that we will be in a range of 2100 down to about 1800. If we break the trendline above, we will go and test the 1800 level. Will I be right? Who knows.. I sure don't. But its sound analysis and I am willing to put my money out there on it.
In an earlier thread I made it clear that my MAX loss was 1700 (Per contract traded - or spread traded). now that is if the market rallies and goes aboves 2100 by december.
However, my stop is right past the highs. Should we break the highs - CLOSE above the highs then I will simply cut my losses and move on.
My goal on this is to earn $1500 per contract/spread traded. For this to happen I need the market to go to the 1850 - 1800 level - which is pretty viable if we break this trendline and the volatility increases.
Best of all I have until December to be right....
The charts above are of the SPX (S&P 500 Cash) but I traded on the SPY (sometimes called SPiders) it's the ETF of the S&P. I use the SPY because the options are VERY liquid with easier and faster fills...
Hope this helps!!
This is real good advice, up to the last sentence, which is still pretty good advice but very tough to do and usually one of the main reasons for the demise of a new business, under capitalization. When my partners and I started our business we mortgaged our homes to get working capital. We had a good business plan, and fortunately we executed it. We were very profitable but we always had loans and lines of credit. Ironically one of our biggest requirements for the line was to pay our taxes every April, the government doesn't give you net 30, they want their money when they want their money.
That's true every time. Every time a stock is bought or sold, it's because one person believes it will be worth more to them in the future and one person believes it will be worth less to them in the future. And every time, one of them is right and one is wrong.
All that quants are doing is technical analysis that tries to edge a percentage point ahead or others.
Fascinating (channeling Spock). Do you use mostly technical analysis? During my little foray into swing trading, head buried in candlestick charts, I'd sometimes get a pervading sense that what I was seeing wasn't "real", meaning action within the chart was all in my head. Probably just my inexperience. I do remember finding options neat (but complex) because they allowed me to substantially get in the game with my smaller cash amount (than most traders). Buuuut, I needed to do much more reading to feel comfortable with it.
No. It is a conglomerate.
It mostly owns many entire companies, from NetJets, to Fruit of the Loom, to the BNSF railroad, to Geico insurance, to Dairy Queen, and on and on. Its insurance subsidiaries have investment portfolios, as do most insurance companies, but that isn't what Berkshire is all about.
At a much earlier stage of the company, it did somewhat resemble a closed end mutual fund, because most of its assets then were shares of other companies. Maybe that is what you are thinking of. It was once small enough that it could do that as its main endeavor. That is no longer so. It is now so big that it must frequently buy more multibillion dollar companies, else cash generated by Geico and the other insurance operations will gather into an unseemly pile.
OP asked me via PM to elaborate a bit more on my short trade.. Here's a little write up for you OP and anyone else that may be interested.
Here is a 2 year chart of the SPX and the VIX (Volatility Index). Generally speaking when the markets are strong the fear is low and therefore the volatility index goes down. When the markets are in turmoil and go down, the VIX goes up.
I could go into a very boring conversation about how the vix worth but nobody would read it - so simply put - market goes up - vix goes down, vice versa.
Notice that in Chart 1. The SPX is on the left the VIX is on the right
You'll see as the market (S&P) is making highs the VIX is making lows:
[/url][/IMG]
But lately there is a divergence between the SP/VIX. As the market makes higher highs the VIX is NOT at the lows, or making lower lows. The divergence is huge...
[/url][/IMG]
SO the divergence is reason 1. Reason 2 the market is overbought (based on my opinion and technical analysis) .
Now we COULD see a small bounce off of this trendline I drew on this chart:
[/url][/IMG]
If it does bounce I don't believe it will be much as the market is losing steam. Current oil prices have helped fuel this but that's only part of the story...
My expectations are that we will be in a range of 2100 down to about 1800. If we break the trendline above, we will go and test the 1800 level. Will I be right? Who knows.. I sure don't. But its sound analysis and I am willing to put my money out there on it.
In an earlier thread I made it clear that my MAX loss was 1700 (Per contract traded - or spread traded). now that is if the market rallies and goes aboves 2100 by december.
However, my stop is right past the highs. Should we break the highs - CLOSE above the highs then I will simply cut my losses and move on.
My goal on this is to earn $1500 per contract/spread traded. For this to happen I need the market to go to the 1850 - 1800 level - which is pretty viable if we break this trendline and the volatility increases.
Best of all I have until December to be right....
The charts above are of the SPX (S&P 500 Cash) but I traded on the SPY (sometimes called SPiders) it's the ETF of the S&P. I use the SPY because the options are VERY liquid with easier and faster fills...
Hope this helps!!
I have a dormant account at TradeKing (dabbled in swing trading) and a very small IRA with Sharebuilder that is invested in only three assets and mostly just sits there (though, it is growing because one of them is a S&P500 fund and I have it set up to automatically reinvest dividends). I also have an invitation to the new "zero commission" Robinhood broker that I could play around with.
.
JoseCuervo: Thanks for the comments. I am a reasonable guy and recognize my limits. My dabbling with swing trading and options (I was only Level 2 approved) was with a quite small amount of money that I had already set aside for that purpose and was willing to lose or nearly so. That's part of the reason commissions were painful; the cash I was playing with was small, and the strategy I was using called for relatively frequent trades. That limitation, as well as an admission that I needed lots more study, caused me to put the "trading" aspect on hold. Still, it was fun and I learned something in the process.
Right now, my goals are long term, and would not involve trading (vs. investing) without substantial additional study and practiced strategy, and that might never come to fruition.
Thanks for your advise and I will give it due thought.
This is real good advice, up to the last sentence, which is still pretty good advice but very tough to do and usually one of the main reasons for the demise of a new business, under capitalization. When my partners and I started our business we mortgaged our homes to get working capital. We had a good business plan, and fortunately we executed it. We were very profitable but we always had loans and lines of credit. Ironically one of our biggest requirements for the line was to pay our taxes every April, the government doesn't give you net 30, they want their money when they want their money.
How long have you been doing this and beating the market (not counting your dividend payers)?
What else do you trade besides SPY?
OP,
Here is some good advice, independent of what investment strategy you pursue.
Go open up accounts with Charles Schwab (regular brokerage account with a margin agreement signed and an IRA account). You can walk into one of their branches or do it online, either way.
Then, transfer the assets from your IRA at Sharebuilder into Schwab and fund the brokerage account with the "6 months cash" you have stocked away in your savings account.
For the rest of your life, you will now have your money held in a reputable, long established and safe institution that provides you as much service as you want. (You can also use Fidelity, or E-trade, but, in my opinion, Schwab is much better, offers much better service, plus has branch locations all over so you can wander in if you ever need one.)
It will make your life easier as your portfolios grow that they are all located at one company, and, as your situation changes, it can expand to meet your needs (custodial accounts, other retirement accounts, etc.)
If saving the $6-8 commission on a trade that Schwab, Fidelity, et al. is important to the profitability of the trade, then you don't have very good investment ideas. And, there is a lot more to running a brokerage business than an App on a phone.
Once you get your 6 months cash into your brokerage account, then you can start deciding what you buy. And, unless your job is real risky, you will likely be ok having your "6 months" in an investment with some sort of appreciation potential as opposed to the 0.08%.