Search Engines?

I personally find the personalization of Google to be very helpful. I tend to want to search things that matter to me. If I'm looking for something related to my university (like my academic calendar), all I have to do is type "academic calendar" and the first one that pops up is the one I want. This semester's calendar, actually! If I want to see what Joe Schmo sees (if I'm searching for myself, for example), I go incognito. Simple as that.
 
You don't need to 'scrub' anything. If you're in Chrome (a Google product) you can simply go anonymous by clicking the 3 horizontal bars in the upper right. A drop down displays and select the 3rd or 4th choice: 'New Incognito Window'.

Boom, now you're anonymous. Search for something and see what 'Joe Blow' would see. Search for bomb making recopies and Google doesn't keep track and if the Government subpoenas them they will have NO RECORD. You're ISP, however, will certainly rat you out so be careful.

Google is good. MicroSoft is BAD. Stop trying to twist it to your liking to sell rooms. Oh, and stop watching Fox too....while you're at it.


You keep believing that. I just hope your defense attorney doesn't. Incognito keeps your tech-unsavy wife from instantly figuring out you looked at porn. That's about it.
 
Last edited:
Okay, I'll admit I'm a bit of a Google fan.
 
I also use bing. It is very fast and there are not any of the problems that google has. I highly reccomend it.
 
You might check into Facebook. As much as I hate the evil empire it is actually a good advertising venue, at least it has been for us.
 
Oh, this thread is self promotion. Sorry, I missed that.

Too bad you need to **** on Google to make your business move ahead. Read my post. Your OP said Bing was better. It's not. Fact.

Uh, no, it's an example of something that I know well. Search for hotels in any city, and you will get a page full of everything BUT hotels in that city. You will see Hotels.com, Expedia, Kayak, etc., instead of what you are actually searching for. These companies have manipulated the search engines so that they appear at the top of the page. These are NOT paid ads, which are easily discerned.

Let me give you an example of how hotels manipulate the search engines. The Patel Family (they now own 65% of the hotels in America) are famous for this.

They buy a property, change the name, and then hire a sweat shop in India (no doubt owned by a family member) to bombard the search engines with searches for this new hotel. They then have this sweat shop post dozens of property "reviews".

They also offer discounts to real people who write positive reviews. All of these actions have the desired effect of forcing them to the top of a Google search. It's a brilliant strategy.

I'm not saying Google is worse than anyone else -- I am trying to find something that works better. Several suggestions (the map search especially, although there are problems there, too) are especially good.
 
Actually, if I am looking for a hotel in a city, I usually go to Hotels.com first. If I am looking for something off the beaten path then the local CofC or other aggregator site are what I prefer. I do not want to go directly to your site. I would rather see some reviews on it first or come to it from a forum where I get some feedback. I think that is the kind of activity that Google supports and it is what I prefer.
 
Uh, no, it's an example of something that I know well. Search for hotels in any city, and you will get a page full of everything BUT hotels in that city. You will see Hotels.com, Expedia, Kayak, etc., instead of what you are actually searching for. These companies have manipulated the search engines so that they appear at the top of the page. These are NOT paid ads, which are easily discerned.

Let me give you an example of how hotels manipulate the search engines. The Patel Family (they now own 65% of the hotels in America) are famous for this.

They buy a property, change the name, and then hire a sweat shop in India (no doubt owned by a family member) to bombard the search engines with searches for this new hotel. They then have this sweat shop post dozens of property "reviews".

They also offer discounts to real people who write positive reviews. All of these actions have the desired effect of forcing them to the top of a Google search. It's a brilliant strategy.

I'm not saying Google is worse than anyone else -- I am trying to find something that works better. Several suggestions (the map search especially, although there are problems there, too) are especially good.

First, I don't think you fully understand how Google works...nor do most people. Google does not like SEO gaming or Spam. They go to great lengths to stop it and they are pretty darn good at it. I see VERY little.

To that, here is a link to Matt Cutts Wiki. He's a Phd working for Google heading up their anti-spam department. I've listened to him speak several times and he describes it as cat and mouse. Very smart guy that Matt Cutts. (Here's his Google Plus profile.)

Now, when it comes to search Google provides the tools and labels them pretty well. Is UI their greatest strength? No, Apple has the market there. But they are engineers and do provide the tools.

For example I did three searches for 'Hotels Denver'. Two on my phone (Nexus 4) and one on my desktop (iMac with Chrome Browser).

The two on my phone were one in Google Maps:

Screenshot_2013-04-04-13-56-11.png


and one in Chrome:

Screenshot_2013-04-04-13-57-33.png


The search on my home computer was just like you suggested...but then I selected 'places' from the row of tabs on the top and the search immediately just showed real live hotels all around Denver. It even had another link to maps.google.com centered on Denver.

Google is lightyears ahead of Microsoft in all these areas. MS basically just copies (literally sometimes) what Google is doing.
 
If I read between the lines correctly, Jay wants to be able to type "Hotels in XYZ" and get links to the actual home pages of actual hotels in XYZ. Instead, what is returned is booking engines, and this makes Jay mad because it's "not what I am searching for"

The funny thing is that the vast majority of people who type "hotels in XYZ" are interested in actually booking a hotel in XYZ. They don't want to click on 30 different web pages, enter in their stay parameters 30 times, and manually sort the prices/locations/etc. They want to use a hotel booking engine to find the hotel that best meets their needs in XYZ.

So Google, Bing, and the rest have decided that the most useful result for someone who types "hotels in XYZ" is a booking site. This is not because the booking sites are paying google to be on the first page, it's because this is what Google believes people want to see.

So to respond to the people like Jay, Google now also shows a collection of individual hotel websites, as demonstrated by James above. They just rank this list below a couple booking sites, because they believe that's what people want when they type "hotels in XYZ".
 
If I read between the lines correctly, Jay wants to be able to type "Hotels in XYZ" and get links to the actual home pages of actual hotels in XYZ. Instead, what is returned is booking engines, and this makes Jay mad because it's "not what I am searching for" ...

(not arguing with you; making a point to Jay)

But, those kinds of listings (individual hotels) are EXACTLY what show up, and are given prominent placement, in the Google Local search results section (with the map and pins).

What's more, I would argue that those Local listings are much more valuable to person looking for a place to go than an otherwise seemingly random listing of individual hotels.
Where is the hotel? Is it near where I want to be?
What do others have to say about the hotel?
Are the rates, hours or other details readily available (and in a consistent format across businesses)?​

As a consumer / potential customer, I am thrilled to have the Google Local search results (and similar on Bing and Yahoo!) ... it makes it much easier for me to find what I'm looking for.

Jay - I'm sorry the search results don't work for you the way you (as a business owner) *think* you want them to. But, I have to say, they work very well for me as a potential guest.
 
Actually, if I am looking for a hotel in a city, I usually go to Hotels.com first. If I am looking for something off the beaten path then the local CofC or other aggregator site are what I prefer. I do not want to go directly to your site. I would rather see some reviews on it first or come to it from a forum where I get some feedback. I think that is the kind of activity that Google supports and it is what I prefer.

Just FYI: What you are getting at Hotels.com can be inaccurate and is easy to manipulate. If I give them a 30% commission per booking (versus the usual 15%), shazam! I am now the "top-rated hotel".

Expedia and Travelocity are the same.

The online booking companies have sadly become a shady part of our business, after such a promising start. When we first got into hotels they were pretty legit. Then the big hotel chains started buying influence.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3...
 
I just did a search for "hotels in Port Aransas, TX" on my smartphone using Google search.

A list of seven came up. Three weren't even hotels. Clicking "see more" brought up two more.

Our hotel never appeared, and many others did not, too.

Completely useless results. There HAS to be a better search engine than this.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3...
 
I just did a search for "hotels in Port Aransas, TX" on my smartphone using Google search.

A list of seven came up. Three weren't even hotels. Clicking "see more" brought up two more.

Our hotel never appeared, and many others did not, too.

Completely useless results. There HAS to be a better search engine than this.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3...

I hope you are not using quotes in your search. Quotes are a very misused tool in searching. Anyway, when I search Google for hotels in Port Aransas, TX (no quotes) I get lots of hotels on the first page. Yours is not one of them but that is not Google's fault. If you do not like to see Hotels.com, then minus it out, i.e. hotels in Port Aransas, TX -hotels.com

Personally, I use hotels.com and like it.
 
p.s. Try boutique hotels in Port Aransas, TX.
 
I just did a search for "hotels in Port Aransas, TX" on my smartphone using Google search.

A list of seven came up. Three weren't even hotels. Clicking "see more" brought up two more.

Our hotel never appeared, and many others did not, too.

Completely useless results. There HAS to be a better search engine than this.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3...

How much do you pay your SEO firm?
 
How much do you pay your SEO firm?

^^that. I'm in the webdev/digital marketing/SEO world and have a number of SEO clients who, unfortunately, had been completely screwed and ripped off by other "SEO" firms.

At the end of the day, Google uses two items to determine your rank "relevancy" (how relevant is the content on your site to the keywords) and "popularity" (how many quality links are there back to your site). Depending on your budget and your SEO firm, you can move just about any site towards the top, regardless of what the company actually does, if you optimize the content properly and get good, high-quality backlinks...and that's why many companies are at the top for keywords that aren't even relevant to their general business.
 
^^that. I'm in the webdev/digital marketing/SEO world and have a number of SEO clients who, unfortunately, had been completely screwed and ripped off by other "SEO" firms.

At the end of the day, Google uses two items to determine your rank "relevancy" (how relevant is the content on your site to the keywords) and "popularity" (how many quality links are there back to your site). Depending on your budget and your SEO firm, you can move just about any site towards the top, regardless of what the company actually does, if you optimize the content properly and get good, high-quality backlinks...and that's why many companies are at the top for keywords that aren't even relevant to their general business.

Like I said, I would pay good, solid, annual subscription money to have access to a real internet search engine that couldn't be spoofed. I don't think I'm alone.
 
Like I said, I would pay good, solid, annual subscription money to have access to a real internet search engine that couldn't be spoofed. I don't think I'm alone.

It's not spoofed Jay. Your website was done in frontage 5.0 and looks like a time capsule. A couple hundred bucks to a high school kid would be money well spent. Google spends millions figuring out how to bring the most relevant content the top, businesses spend millions crafting good content to get to the top. One thing that the google holds in high regard is a commitment to content. I.e. did someone put some sweat equity in building it or did they hack it together in front page one night? The one with a lot of time, thought and considerations done by professionals, using best practices... Go to the top. Stale front page based sites thrown together over a beer or two dont.

This is like saying pintos should be able to compete in Formula One.

Any search algorithm can be gamed. They have to have some metrics to decide who comes first. As soon as someone figures out what that is, it's a race to outdo each other. Remember all the link farms? Not good. Google tries to make gaming the system a good thing.

Can't be spoofed is impossible unless the algorithm is just random. They gotta decide some way who comes first.
 
Last edited:
Your website was done in frontage 5.0 and looks like a time capsule. A couple hundred bucks to a high school kid would be money well spent. Google spends millions figuring out how to bring the most relevant content the top, businesses spend millions crafting good content to get to the top.

Adding to this, take a look at the results for your site vs a competitor's:

http://www.seoworkers.com/tools/analyzer.html

I ran the above on both ameliaslanding.com and islandhotelportaransas.com. The competitor nailed their keywords, and basically had a "perfect" on each key SEO point -- the amelia site... not so much. Additionally, their presumed keywords rocked, and included the important "port aransas hotel".

I assume that the person who hoists a FP5 site has a "do it yourself" mentality... so the above report (which I have no affiliation with, and have never used before this evening, and know nothing about their other services) will link you to some google videos and might help out with your website being "tuned" better so search engines know exactly what you're up to. The keywords which were being associated with the amelia landing site were very telling -- and "port aransas hotel" was not one of them.

Worth a few hours or days of sweat equity to tune this stuff, as mentioned, it's a competitive market you're playing in. Google may take a few weeks to show the new improvements, but they'll arrive in due time. You don't have to buy adwords to have a good organic search result, but you do need to be choosy with your content, and how it is viewed by the googlebot. :D

$0.02

- Mike
 
You don't build websites for a living Jay -- why do you think you can compete with those who do?
 
It's not spoofed Jay. Your website was done in frontage 5.0 and looks like a time capsule. A couple hundred bucks to a high school kid would be money well spent. Google spends millions figuring out how to bring the most relevant content the top, businesses spend millions crafting good content to get to the top. One thing that the google holds in high regard is a commitment to content. I.e. did someone put some sweat equity in building it or did they hack it together in front page one night? The one with a lot of time, thought and considerations done by professionals, using best practices... Go to the top. Stale front page based sites thrown together over a beer or two dont.

This is like saying pintos should be able to compete in Formula One.

Any search algorithm can be gamed. They have to have some metrics to decide who comes first. As soon as someone figures out what that is, it's a race to outdo each other. Remember all the link farms? Not good. Google tries to make gaming the system a good thing.

Can't be spoofed is impossible unless the algorithm is just random. They gotta decide some way who comes first.

The search engine has been spoofed when things that are not hotels come up on a search for hotels -- and actual hotels do not. You're confusing shiny things for actual web content.

Let's forget about hotels, as this makes it perhaps too personal. Search "cars for sale in Corpus Christi" and look at all the crap that pops up, mostly for sites like Cars.com. It's just another example of how people with time and money can force the real search results off the page.

I would pay good subscription money for a search engine that returned an actual list of cars for sale in Corpus Christi.
 
Adding to this, take a look at the results for your site vs a competitor's:

http://www.seoworkers.com/tools/analyzer.html

I ran the above on both ameliaslanding.com and islandhotelportaransas.com. The competitor nailed their keywords, and basically had a "perfect" on each key SEO point -- the amelia site... not so much. Additionally, their presumed keywords rocked, and included the important "port aransas hotel".

I assume that the person who hoists a FP5 site has a "do it yourself" mentality... so the above report (which I have no affiliation with, and have never used before this evening, and know nothing about their other services) will link you to some google videos and might help out with your website being "tuned" better so search engines know exactly what you're up to. The keywords which were being associated with the amelia landing site were very telling -- and "port aransas hotel" was not one of them.

Worth a few hours or days of sweat equity to tune this stuff, as mentioned, it's a competitive market you're playing in. Google may take a few weeks to show the new improvements, but they'll arrive in due time. You don't have to buy adwords to have a good organic search result, but you do need to be choosy with your content, and how it is viewed by the googlebot. :D

$0.02

- Mike

Interesting, especially since "Port Aransas hotel" is the very first keyword on our site.
 
The search engine has been spoofed when things that are not hotels come up on a search for hotels -- and actual hotels do not. You're confusing shiny things for actual web content.

Let's forget about hotels, as this makes it perhaps too personal. Search "cars for sale in Corpus Christi" and look at all the crap that pops up, mostly for sites like Cars.com. It's just another example of how people with time and money can force the real search results off the page.

I would pay good subscription money for a search engine that returned an actual list of cars for sale in Corpus Christi.

I saw cars.com in the paid results, which seems highly relevant. The rest if the entire first page is..... Places to buy cars in corpus Christi.

I think you're misguided at best. Honestly, it seems like you're bitter because you're not on the first page. I can instantly see about 20 reasons why that is, that could be fixed in a couple days work by an entry level web developer.

If you have an idea for a better search algorithm, the market potential will put you in the same sentence with Gates and Jobs. Plenty of venture capitalist willing to listen.
 
I would pay good subscription money for a search engine that returned an actual list of cars for sale in Corpus Christi.

There is exactly such a thing!

It's called cars.com :D

Google is aware that despite their best efforts, they are not going to be the compendium of every thing in the world. They can't index the used car inventory of every dealer on every lot in Corpus Christi, there are sites out there that do that job (and only that job) better than Google can. So Google tries to steer you to one of those sites. This is an area they are trying to get into, (as they have with the "Google Local" results shown up-thread for hotels), but they're not there yet, and might not be ever.

Google is the yellow pages of the Internet. Do you expect the (actual) yellow pages to have a list of all cars for sale, or simply a list of places you can go to find out what cars are for sale?

Do you expect Google to tell you the list of milk prices at every local supermarket? Or gas prices? Or should you expect Google to tell you "findmymilk.com knows about milk prices, and gasbuddy.com knows about gas"?

They're not sending you to hotels.com or cars.com because those sites have bought off their ranking... Google sends you to those sites because those sites are the best sites on the Internet to find a listing of hotels or cars in a particular area.
 
Interesting, especially since "Port Aransas hotel" is the very first keyword on our site.

Really I see it nowhere on your main page other than in the title.
 
There is exactly such a thing!

It's called cars.com :D

Google is aware that despite their best efforts, they are not going to be the compendium of every thing in the world. They can't index the used car inventory of every dealer on every lot in Corpus Christi, there are sites out there that do that job (and only that job) better than Google can. So Google tries to steer you to one of those sites. This is an area they are trying to get into, (as they have with the "Google Local" results shown up-thread for hotels), but they're not there yet, and might not be ever.

Google is the yellow pages of the Internet. Do you expect the (actual) yellow pages to have a list of all cars for sale, or simply a list of places you can go to find out what cars are for sale?

Do you expect Google to tell you the list of milk prices at every local supermarket? Or gas prices? Or should you expect Google to tell you "findmymilk.com knows about milk prices, and gasbuddy.com knows about gas"?

They're not sending you to hotels.com or cars.com because those sites have bought off their ranking... Google sends you to those sites because those sites are the best sites on the Internet to find a listing of hotels or cars in a particular area.

Sadly I suppose that's true. But until someone invents a search engine that doesn't utilize payment for position, or that refers you to other sites that do the same, the results will always be skewed away from the small businesses I favor.

When I want a hotel I don't want to stay at the multinational corporation with the deepest advertising pockets. When I'm looking for a car I don't want to only see the cars that are sold by web savvy kids or dealers who use Cars.com. When I'm looking for a great place to eat it's certainly not going to be the place that bought the greatest web presense, because we all know where that money came from.

I used to think that review sites were the answer to this problem, but they have become weapons in the hands of the unscrupulous and are not to be trusted.

So...I don't know the answer -- but I know that in my family, anyway, Google is fading fast as the go-to place to search for things. The results of too many searches are simply inaccurate, incomplete, or obviously bought and paid for.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3...
 
Maybe the internet isn't the right place for you to search for what you're looking for. Maybe a bulletin board at the local church or something would be better.

It sounds like You want to use the internet to find low tech businesses. Its just not how it works. There are not a lot of Amish businesses listed on Google either.

I'm not sure either why you are so suspicious of sponsered links. Google is very upfront about informing the user what has been paid placement. Before Google it was a straight up pay for placement and the user was not informed. Google railed against that and gave us identifiable ads. That good. You wouldn't suggest you have a right to earn money with your business and Google does not?
 
Sadly I suppose that's true. But until someone invents a search engine that doesn't utilize payment for position, or that refers you to other sites that do the same, the results will always be skewed away from the small businesses I favor.

When I want a hotel I don't want to stay at the multinational corporation with the deepest advertising pockets. When I'm looking for a car I don't want to only see the cars that are sold by web savvy kids or dealers who use Cars.com. When I'm looking for a great place to eat it's certainly not going to be the place that bought the greatest web presense, because we all know where that money came from.

I used to think that review sites were the answer to this problem, but they have become weapons in the hands of the unscrupulous and are not to be trusted.

So...I don't know the answer -- but I know that in my family, anyway, Google is fading fast as the go-to place to search for things. The results of too many searches are simply inaccurate, incomplete, or obviously bought and paid for.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S3...

You seem to have it figured out.
 
Jay, your Web site needs some work. You can't do anything about the paid ads coming up on top, but you can do a lot better on organic search.

There are structural things you can do that would help you a lot. Your various tags need work, especially the ALT tags. Also, the few images I looked at are being resized by the browser. If you resize the inline images server-side and use a lightbox (or even just an ordinary img link) to open them full-size, you can slip a title tag in there, as well.

Be careful with ALT tags, though. Remember that their purpose is to provide the blind with a description of the image; so above all, they must accurately describe the image. If you're careful, you can do this in a way that gives you SEO benefit. If you overdo it and are caught, you can hurt yourself. Using the ALT tags to spam the blind is frowned upon by search engines.

For example, the first picture on your home page is missing its ALT tag (minor penalty for non-compliance, because the ALT tag is mandatory). You could derive some SEO benefit with an accurate, descriptive ALT tag such as "Exterior view of Amelias's Landing, an aviation-themed hotel in Port Aransas, Texas." That would avoid the penalty for missing required element; it's accurate, so it wouldn't hurt you if hand-reviewed; and it gets your hotel's location and theme tagged to the image. Go a step further and open it in a lightbox or a new window, and you can slip a title tag in the link, as well.

Each of these little things adds up. I am very confident that if you went through the site and thoughtfully corrected all of these structural deficiencies, you would easily get to page 1 of the organic results in every major engine.

I don't know how easily it could be done with FP because I haven't used it in more than a decade (and I didn't like it that one time that I did), but I do recall that there was a source view where you could override FP's mistakes.

-Rich
 
Last edited:
Maybe the internet isn't the right place for you to search for what you're looking for. Maybe a bulletin board at the local church or something would be better.

It sounds like You want to use the internet to find low tech businesses. Its just not how it works. There are not a lot of Amish businesses listed on Google either.

I'm not sure either why you are so suspicious of sponsered links. Google is very upfront about informing the user what has been paid placement. Before Google it was a straight up pay for placement and the user was not informed. Google railed against that and gave us identifiable ads. That good. You wouldn't suggest you have a right to earn money with your business and Google does not?

Now that's funny! :D

No, I won't be replacing search engines with church bulletin boards anytime soon. But, sooner or later, I think demand for better search results will push things toward my ideal.

Sponsored links don't bother me at all. They are clearly labeled, and pay for the search engine. It's the companies who have spent bazillions gaming the system in order to get their (mostly unwanted) results at the top of Page One that are the problem.
 
Now that's funny! :D

No, I won't be replacing search engines with church bulletin boards anytime soon. But, sooner or later, I think demand for better search results will push things toward my ideal.

Sponsored links don't bother me at all. They are clearly labeled, and pay for the search engine. It's the companies who have spent bazillions gaming the system in order to get their (mostly unwanted) results at the top of Page One that are the problem.

I happen to agree with you. Google used to be better at filtering out that sort of thing... nowadays, not so much. If anything, Penguin and, to a slightly lesser extent, Panda have made things worse, in my opinion. I don't know whether or not this is a scam on Google's part to force more people into their Adwords program, but it wouldn't surprise me.

Penguin particularly annoys me because as with most things Google, they set their robots loose with little human supervision. A lot of good sites have been hurt precisely because they were so good that a lot of people would link to them, especially in forums, because they had good answers. Penguin picks up on those links and more often than not assumes that they're spam.

So... if you happen to have the world's best information on some topic, and a gazillion people post a link to your answer because it really is that good, and Penguin doesn't consider the sites from which those links originate to be worthy of its anointing, then expect your rankings to nosedive. Why? Basically, because your content was too good and too many people linked to it.

Of course, you can always register for a Google account, and then for Webmaster Tools, and then upload the code to your site to enable it, and then wait around a while to get a meaningful number of hits so you know who is linking to you, and then visit every one of those sites and try to guess whether or not Google approves of it, and then request that the links be removed (which won't happen, but you can still request it), and then make a list of the links that you think Google won't approve of, and then create a file with those links, and then go through Google's process of disavowing the links.

It's a mess.

However, there are things that always help a site, such as good content presented using the words and phrases people are likely to use when searching for your product; standards compliance; and thoughtful use of tags, headings, subheadings, and emphases. Those things never go out of style.

-Rich
 
Now that's funny! :D

No, I won't be replacing search engines with church bulletin boards anytime soon. But, sooner or later, I think demand for better search results will push things toward my ideal.

Sponsored links don't bother me at all. They are clearly labeled, and pay for the search engine. It's the companies who have spent bazillions gaming the system in order to get their (mostly unwanted) results at the top of Page One that are the problem.

Well that's why I brought up Matt Cutts. He's THE guy who heads the entire department at Google to combat spam. Google knows that gaming the search results is bad for users and what's bad for users is bad for Google.

The problems you described (hotel sites when searching for hotels) don't strike me as problems. I showed you how to limit the results to businesses by using the 'places' tab and others have suggested if you're interested in better search rankings for your hotel you should clean some things up on your site.

So, as an admitted Google fanboy, I'm having trouble seeing the problem.
 
Now that's funny! :D

No, I won't be replacing search engines with church bulletin boards anytime soon. But, sooner or later, I think demand for better search results will push things toward my ideal.

Sponsored links don't bother me at all. They are clearly labeled, and pay for the search engine. It's the companies who have spent bazillions gaming the system in order to get their (mostly unwanted) results at the top of Page One that are the problem.

You've identified what could be the most lucrative business idea in the world. A better search engine than Google. Go for it. Don't just sit around waiting on someone else to implement your great idea, get it done, take the lead. PLENTY of venture capitalist willing to listen to that. You'll have so much money, you'll give ATC a bonus check and buy carbon credits for your BBJ. :D
 
You've identified what could be the most lucrative business idea in the world. A better search engine than Google. Go for it. Don't just sit around waiting on someone else to implement your great idea, get it done, take the lead. PLENTY of venture capitalist willing to listen to that. You'll have so much money, you'll give ATC a bonus check and buy carbon credits for your BBJ. :D

Mysidebias.com.
 
Back
Top