2) That everyone else cares
Maybe he should have kept his driver in the bag.
The exposure is sudden. The activities occured over time and everyone covering it up is complicit in the fraud.
We make the mistake of thinking that the rich and famous and talented must also be honest, and are frequently disappointed when we find out that they suffer the same temptations as the rest of humanity. The biggest difference between the poor and the rich is the ability of the rich to indulge in as much tomfoolery as they do.
That said, there are many rich and famous folks who are decent. They just don't make the headlines. I imagine they have work pretty hard to control their lives.
Dan
While I agree with this, I don't know why it's any of our business if Tiger Woods has an affair or not. I don't think it's any of our business even if someone we really know has an affair, unless it's with our spouse or something.We make the mistake of thinking that the rich and famous and talented must also be honest, and are frequently disappointed when we find out that they suffer the same temptations as the rest of humanity. The biggest difference between the poor and the rich is the ability of the rich to indulge in as much tomfoolery as they do.
A little known (and perhaps less cared-about) fact regarding the top PGA players is that many of them don't bank their checks from tournament winnings, they just send the cash to the IRS as tax withholding payments.
Their endorsement and corporate outing money is where their bread is buttered, and that's why Tiger is fighting so hard to protect himself from disqualification under the morals clause in those contracts.
Tiger Woods and NFL players didn't get bailout money. I think it's insane how much they get paid to play a game but I guess that's the free market. I won't watch Tiger Woods any less than I did, which is zero, but I don't care what he makes or who he sleeps with.I wonder why no one cares about how much these guys make? I mean everone is mad that wallstreeters for getting bonuses. Why not how mych Tiger Woods or PGA member, or NFL players make?
... I don't agree with it all, but understand criminal charges are being investigated.
....
Tiger Woods and NFL players didn't get bailout money. I think it's insane how much they get paid to play a game but I guess that's the free market. I won't watch Tiger Woods any less than I did, which is zero, but I don't care what he makes or who he sleeps with.
Just out of curiousity, what have you heard? I haven't followed this at all, but I'm curious as to what could be charged beyond some minor traffic crime Careless driving sounds like it would be the only category of charge applicable here.
Prostitution -- both sides -- is still illegal in most jurisdictions.
Prostitution -- both sides -- is still illegal in most jurisdictions.
Like I said, I haven't been following this. Is there any actual evidence of it?
"Actual" defined as more than the word of a hooker.
Tiger Woods and NFL players didn't get bailout money. I think it's insane how much they get paid to play a game but I guess that's the free market. I won't watch Tiger Woods any less than I did, which is zero, but I don't care what he makes or who he sleeps with.
While I agree with this, I don't know why it's any of our business if Tiger Woods has an affair or not. I don't think it's any of our business even if someone we really know has an affair, unless it's with our spouse or something.
I do feel bad for any kids that were using Tiger as a role model, though. But he's far from the first professional athlete to disappoint or disillusion young fans.
I can't remember who I idolized as a child, but it certainly wasn't any athlete (of course I never have and never will be much of one myself).
Why not look up to someone who's actually done something for the world?
I doubt you'll find many boys under 12 that gravitate toward the Gandhi types, no matter how appropriate it may be. Back in my day it was baseball and football players. We had heated discussions about who was better, Bradshaw, Tarkenton or Namath...
+1 - the promise he broke (if he even made it, I don't know) was to his spouse. It's between them.
A little known (and perhaps less cared-about) fact regarding the top PGA players is that many of them don't bank their checks from tournament winnings, they just send the cash to the IRS as tax withholding payments.
Their endorsement and corporate outing money is where their bread is buttered, and that's why Tiger is fighting so hard to protect himself from disqualification under the morals clause in those contracts.
I can't remember who I idolized as a child, but it certainly wasn't any athlete (of course I never have and never will be much of one myself).
Why not look up to someone who's actually done something for the world?
You're implication that athletes don't "do something for the world" with their money is short sighted in a lot of cases. Many of them help with inner-city causes and other charities. IMHO that is "doing something for the world".
You're implication that athletes don't "do something for the world" with their money is short sighted in a lot of cases. Many of them help with inner-city causes and other charities. IMHO that is "doing something for the world".
Not really. Infidelity and divorce always affects far, far more than 2 people, for a much longer time than anyone cares to contemplate.
True, IF there are kids.
Sure, some do, and they should be commended for that. It's never been my impression that that's what many of them do with their spare time and efforts. But, I've never thought much of professional sports anyway, so I haven't paid much attention. Also, that's definitely not what the kids are looking up to or even seeing.
....and friends, and siblings, and parents, and neighbors and classrooms and countless others we don't know take cues from our behavior.
As much as we like to imagine we are each independent atoms, the fact remains we are social creatures whose actions affect others, for good or for ill.
+1...All of those folks choose how they're affected, and can choose what happens afterwards. Kids do not/cannot.
Again, absent children the only person who has the right to feel betrayed by infidelity is the spouse, and then only if that particular marriage had a promise of fidelity.
Other people may be upset/hurt/affected by the dissolution of a marriage. That doesn't give them rights or claims.
I doubt you'll find many boys under 12 that gravitate toward the Gandhi types, no matter how appropriate it may be. Back in my day it was baseball and football players. We had heated discussions about who was better, Bradshaw, Tarkenton or Namath...
Trapper John
All of those folks choose how they're affected, and can choose what happens afterwards. Kids do not/cannot.
Again, absent children the only person who has the right to feel betrayed by infidelity is the spouse, and then only if that particular marriage had a promise of fidelity.
Other people may be upset/hurt/affected by the dissolution of a marriage. That doesn't give them rights or claims.
With the exception of certain business relationships because we don't know what was in his contracts, that's only because they let themselves be affected.His business relationships, his freindships, his metors, and his fans have all been affected.
With the exception of certain business relationships because we don't know what was in his contracts, that's only because they let themselves be affected.