airheadpenguin
Pre-takeoff checklist
Heard from my DPE tonight that safety pilots need to sign the logbook of the person under the hood. This was news to me, can anyone help with a citation?
There was a proposal to that effect in an NPRM a while back, but it was rejected, so the current reg still says you just need the name of the safety pilot. The reference is 14 CFR 61.51(g)(3)(ii).
Hmm. Mentioned in TWO places. Must be important.
Heard from my DPE tonight that safety pilots need to sign the logbook of the person under the hood. This was news to me, can anyone help with a citation?
There's nothing to say you can't put in more than required, but neither certificate number nor signature are required for the safety pilot involved in simulated instrument flight. Not once, not ever.Nope
First entry, I had full name and cert # with signature, after that just last name in the copilot/instructor box. This was a little while ago, but worked fine for me with DPEs and FSDO rides after that.
DPEs make up things with no basis also.Heard from my DPE tonight that safety pilots need to sign the logbook of the person under the hood. This was news to me, can anyone help with a citation?
There's nothing to say you can't put in more than required, but neither certificate number nor signature are required for the safety pilot involved in simulated instrument flight. Not once, not ever.
What "BS down the road"? You mean satisfying a DPE who demands something the regs don't require? That's a road not to be travelled. Next thing you know, you'll be attaching printouts of the METAR's and FA's to prove actual instrument conditions. Or photocopies of your instructor's certificates to show qualifications and expiration dates. Where does that end? In this case, following the regulation is quite sufficient, and there are many reasons folks will want not to have their cert # (which may be their SSN) with their full name in someone else's logbook.However as the OP has seen, just having it in there once to postivitly ID your saftey pilot, can help eliminate BS down the road.
What "BS down the road"? You mean satisfying a DPE who demands something the regs don't require? That's a road not to be travelled. Next thing you know, you'll be attaching printouts of the METAR's and FA's to prove actual instrument conditions. Or photocopies of your instructor's certificates to show qualifications and expiration dates. Where does that end? In this case, following the regulation is quite sufficient, and there are many reasons folks will want not to have their cert # (which may be their SSN) with their full name in someone else's logbook.
Ends with common sense
It makes sense to be to put a ticket number by the first saftey pilot entry, we put our N number for the aircraft right? CFI puts his cert and exp date right?
DPEs are not authorities on anything. The only power they are granted is giving checkrides and issuing the certificates based on those. Other than that they are just politically connected flight instructors.
DPEs make up things with no basis also.
The N-number, CFI certificate number, and CFI expiration date are logged because they are required, not because they are "common sense."
Likewise, the name of the safety pilot is required, not his or her signature or certificate number.
A better analogy would be logging the serial number of the aircraft. Do you do that?
Never keep more documentation than is required. Things like VOR checks for example should be done on something disposable. There is a reason corporate america lives by document retention rules.
And both should be taken with the same questioning attitude (if not the proverbial grain of salt).As do a lot of Internet "experts".
I've owned two planes whose N-numbers have been on other planes, too, so that won't necessarily help. But that really doesn't matter. You can put the safety pilot's blood type and mother's maiden name in your log if you like, but there's absolutely no reason to do so, and there may be reasons not to.Do I put the serial for the plane, don't have to I have the N number which can be run in a few seconds and produce the serial, owner, Mode S code etc.
, but there's absolutely no reason to do so, and there may be reasons not to.
Already mentioned, starting with personal data which can be used for identity theft.Such as???