RV Accident Cause Summary by Type

wanttaja

En-Route
Joined
Jun 7, 2008
Messages
4,868
Location
Seattle
Display Name

Display name:
Ron Wanttaja
The subject of RV accident causes came up on, for all things, a Dutch homebuilding Facebook page. I put together the attached summary.

http://www.wanttaja.com/RV_wanttaja.pdf

The accident database covers 1998-2013, inclusive. The above file is based on the automated summary the database can create based on the aircraft type. It may take a bit of study to understand since it was not designed for routine public use. It’s designed for a weird size only to allow the entire summary to show on one “page” rather than force the reader to contend with page wrap. The page is a "working" page, there are some sections with old/outdated data and methods.

The pages cover the RV-3, -4, -6, -7, -8, -9, and -10 series aircraft. The trigear versions (“A” models) are lumped in together with the taildragger ones as the NTSB listings are a bit inconsistent with the nomenclature. Similarly, the RV-12s are not included, as there is uncertainty as to which are Experimental Amateur-Built and which are Experimental or Special Light Sport.

The “Baseline” or “Overall Homebuilt” columns refer to all Experimental Amateur-Built aircraft accidents in the period covered by the database.

The “Primary” column refers to the cases where the particular cause was the initial event that caused accident. The “Both” column includes both these cases, and ones where the cause was a secondary one. The accident causes were based on the author’s own reading of the accident narrative, not on the NTSB’s Probable Cause.

Ron Wanttaja
 
How many of the primary causes were zoom climbs?
 
Looks like pilot miscontrol is by far the biggest cause.

Engine failure, maintenance error, and builder error are also right up there. I suppose some of the engine failures might be fuel starvation, but otherwise these categories sound like they are peculiar to homebuilts.
 
Looks like pilot miscontrol is by far the biggest cause.

Engine failure, maintenance error, and builder error are also right up there. I suppose some of the engine failures might be fuel starvation, but otherwise these categories sound like they are peculiar to homebuilts.
Not "Peculiar", because the causes happen with all types. Most of these categories are less common in production types, but, for instance, the Cessna 210 has a higher instance of maintenance failure than most RVs (more complex airplane, of course). Builder Error *does* occur to production aircraft, but ADs reduce the recurrence.

I've run a similar analysis on some GA aircraft:

http://www.wanttaja.com/GA_wanttaja.pdf

Keep in mind that the 172 accidents include training; a larger percentage of pilot miscontrol and a better probability it's survivable.

Ron Wanttaja
 
How many of the primary causes were zoom climbs?
That would fall under the "Maneuvering at Low Altitude" category, though the category actually covers a number of types of accidents (buzzing, low altitude aerobatics, etc.). RVs' results are roughly the same as the overall homebuilt fleet, which is a bit higher than GA.

Ron Wanttaja
 
Hey Ron do you have these type of spreadsheets available for other experimental airplanes?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Hey Ron do you have these type of spreadsheets available for other experimental airplanes?
Generating the spreadsheets is literally as simple as typing in the homebuilt aircraft type. Been debating setting up a web page with links to the reports for multiple types.

However, one must understand that the NTSB investigators don't always include all the specifics regarding the aircraft involved in an accident. I mentioned the taildragger and nosegear RVs, for instance... just because the NTSB says it was an "RV-7" DOESN'T mean it's not an RV-7A.

It get harder with other types. I can enter "Glasair III" and get all the planes that the NTSB designated "Glasair III", but there are a lot of just plain "Glasairs" and many of them are probably IIIs.

The RVs are relatively simple, in comparison.

BTW, my results correct for the differences in how an NTSB investigator may record an aircraft type. I have a separate column for the "real name" of the aircraft...so if the NTSB lists it as a "Jones Vans 7" I enter "Vans RV-7" in what I call the "Kennel Name" column....

Ron Wanttaja
 
Back
Top