Yeah. Say the local NIMBY Chapter has finally had enough with the airport and they attack...Is it possible to have a runway incursion at an untowered airport?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
This is a common topic for us. The answer as I have received from the FAA as an airport is no, at least by how incursion is currently defined. Used to be an incursion had to involve a loss of separation between aircraft or a vehicle in an aircraft. They changed the definition about 10 years ago to remove the separation requirement, but to link it to any incorrect presence within the runway safety area.
Now if you are talking about aircraft vs aircraft at an untowered airport, there is literally no regulation that defines what separation is required between aircraft. There is nothing that prohibits two aircraft from occupying the runway at the same time. Now at Part 139 certificated commercial airports, vehicles and pedestrians are regulated differently, but for the purposes of this discussion it isn't worth going into.
If the airport’s closed, there’s technically no runway, so no incursion.Wouldn’t it actually be a runway incursion if the untowered airport was closed?
Wouldn’t it actually be a runway incursion if the untowered airport was closed?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If it was closed, the simple act of landing there could be considered an incursion? Couldn't it?If the airport’s closed, there’s technically no runway, so no incursion.
Yes, but not a runway incursion.If it was closed, the simple act of landing there could be considered an incursion? Couldn't it?
Dang it. Just when I thought I was on to somethingYes, but not a runway incursion.