- Joined
- May 11, 2010
- Messages
- 20,654
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
- Display Name
Display name:
Snorting his way across the USA
Never mind that I felt like I was riding on the deck of a fishing trawler in gale force winds being pummeled with torrential rain, hauling in the catch of the day (the trawler was manufactured by Nissan and I was actually inside it) but I had to secure me some seafood. The gale force winds and torrential rain were, however, in effect.
So as I stepped up to the register, I asked 'Fayeanne' (how the hell do you get Fayanne out Hu Ling?) if the deal was on for two fish sandwiches for five dollars, she answered "Yes, but only for the crispy fish and the Nashville hot fish sandwich" in a surprisingly unaccented voice. Well, there was only one reply. "Got a boyfriend or a husband or some crap like that?" Okay, I didn't really say that. I did say "Gimmie one of each, and a side salad with Ranch."
This is how it all arrived:
Just like that, think it didn't. I don't know if the Nashville Hot Fish sandwich is of the hotfish variety, or if it is just hot fish, but it did occur to me Nashville has never been promoted as a seafood destination. We will overlook that.
When you eat lobster, you wear a lobster bib, right? I didn't have a lobster bib but that second, unnecessary paper bag made a nice place mat.
Really, it didn't look half bad. As you can see, the fish are somewhat triangular in appearance, and they didn't appear to be exactly the same. True fillets. The Crispy Fish is to the right, the Nashville Hot Fish is to the left.
Prepping the fish was easily accomplished: Scrape the tartar sauce, lettuce and mayo from the buns, transfer to the fish, and chow down.
As you can see, the fish is tender and flaky, and the batter is not overly thick. It was almost like a panko batter. Although it seemed a tad thin, the heft was reasonable for a $2.50 piece of fish.
Bottom line? Not bad. The taste was decent. The tartar sauce complimented it perfectly. The only thing though, was that I could not tell any difference between the Crispy Fish and the Nashville Hot Fish other than the fact that one had pickles on it and the other didn't.
There is the old adage: Don't order the fish in a steak restaurant. But Arby's is hardly steak. Comparison to the Filet O Fish? Arby's is a clear, hands down winner. Would I go through that exercise again? Most def.
So as I stepped up to the register, I asked 'Fayeanne' (how the hell do you get Fayanne out Hu Ling?) if the deal was on for two fish sandwiches for five dollars, she answered "Yes, but only for the crispy fish and the Nashville hot fish sandwich" in a surprisingly unaccented voice. Well, there was only one reply. "Got a boyfriend or a husband or some crap like that?" Okay, I didn't really say that. I did say "Gimmie one of each, and a side salad with Ranch."
This is how it all arrived:
Just like that, think it didn't. I don't know if the Nashville Hot Fish sandwich is of the hotfish variety, or if it is just hot fish, but it did occur to me Nashville has never been promoted as a seafood destination. We will overlook that.
When you eat lobster, you wear a lobster bib, right? I didn't have a lobster bib but that second, unnecessary paper bag made a nice place mat.
Really, it didn't look half bad. As you can see, the fish are somewhat triangular in appearance, and they didn't appear to be exactly the same. True fillets. The Crispy Fish is to the right, the Nashville Hot Fish is to the left.
Prepping the fish was easily accomplished: Scrape the tartar sauce, lettuce and mayo from the buns, transfer to the fish, and chow down.
As you can see, the fish is tender and flaky, and the batter is not overly thick. It was almost like a panko batter. Although it seemed a tad thin, the heft was reasonable for a $2.50 piece of fish.
Bottom line? Not bad. The taste was decent. The tartar sauce complimented it perfectly. The only thing though, was that I could not tell any difference between the Crispy Fish and the Nashville Hot Fish other than the fact that one had pickles on it and the other didn't.
There is the old adage: Don't order the fish in a steak restaurant. But Arby's is hardly steak. Comparison to the Filet O Fish? Arby's is a clear, hands down winner. Would I go through that exercise again? Most def.
Last edited: