Hangar Talk
Open forum for discussion of any topic you like, aviation related or otherwise.
Virtually all topics in this forum are permitted - so long as they are discussed in a civil manner.
Well it it did get to the SZ let me publicly protest it. Why not just deal with it in the forum just like any other topic? I don't get it.
I say abolish the spin zone and 90% of our government. And hate on the Democrats and Republicans. And hate even more on the independents.
It was originally posted in the SZ, not moved.Well it it did get to the SZ let me publicly protest it. Why not just deal with it in the forum just like any other topic? I don't get it.
Another unarmed victim, another success for the anti-gunners.
How about Korean chicks, how do you feel about them? What if they ride motorcycles and beat the **** out of you, would that give you a woody?
It's not possible to know the outcome. The vast majority of time that guns are used in self-defense, they're not even fired. Often just a show of force is enough to defuse the situation. The reason most people join gangs, is because they are cowards. Odds are an M-60 wouldn't be necessary. A show of force, would have probably been enough, for the cowards to turn tail and run. If not, dropping the aggressor would have probably been enough, to neutralize the threat.What do you think would have happened if he had opened fire and shot some of the off duty cops and corrections officers who are in that gang of thugs? Do you think he'd be alive? What gun short of an M-60 with a full belt would have sufficed?
Oh man, Henning. You are so OUT there sometimes.He had a perfectly lethal weapon in that truck, I would have tossed it in reverse and run over people, the forward and run over more. I would have been doing donuts on them.
He had a perfectly lethal weapon in that truck, I would have tossed it in reverse and run over people, the forward and run over more. I would have been doing donuts on them.
Oh man, Henning. You are so OUT there sometimes.
It's not possible to know the outcome. The vast majority of time that guns are used in self-defense, they're not even fired. Often just a show of force is enough to defuse the situation. The reason most people join gangs, is because they are cowards. Odds are an M-60 wouldn't be necessary. A show of force, would have probably been enough, for the cowards to turn tail and run. If not, dropping the aggressor would have probably been enough, to neutralize the threat.
A person doesn't have to survive, to be a winner. The man in the SUV justifiably feared for his life and his wife and child; because of the unjustified reckless illegal actions of the motorcycle gang (including several off-duty cops). If need be, don't you think many people are willing to die to defend themselves, their family and their country?
In most cases, I'd rather die fighting. If you volunteer to be a victim, then you're putting your family and yourself in the hands of criminals. In doing so they will probably have more control over the evidence and spin. I figure if I'm going to die, I'm willing to die fighting unjust aggressors, and I'd rather leave as much evidence as possible. That's part of the reason I support high capacity magazines. If an innocent person dies and leaves a bunch dead bodies of gang members behind, the public and the investigators will hopefully figure out it is self-defense and have enough evidence to hunt down other gang members.
Many people have forgotten the bravery and integrity that helped found and defend this country. Many people were willing risk and sacrifice their lives for their principles; so that future generations could enjoy the relative prosperity and freedom that we have inherited.
The revolutionary and civil war was fought to give us our freedom. We shouldn't surrender our freedoms, because we are afraid. Jews were forced to surrender their freedoms in Nazi Germany, that didn't work out too well for the Jews.
I don't think introducing guns to the story would have decreased the violence of the outcome.
Guy surrounded by 30 pulls A gun. No, better to stay in the car and flee like he did. Running into stopped traffic was bad fortune. Too bad he couldn't make it to a PD precinct.
You didn't miss anything. It started out in Hangar Talk and last I knew was in the Spin Zone. Now I cannot find it at all nor any evidence it was even here. It had gone about 280 posts last I saw of it.
What do you think would have happened if he had opened fire and shot some of the off duty cops and corrections officers who are in that gang of thugs? Do you think he'd be alive? What gun short of an M-60 with a full belt would have sufficed?
I don't think introducing guns to the story would have decreased the violence of the outcome.
Guy surrounded by 30 pulls A gun. No, better to stay in the car and flee like he did. Running into stopped traffic was bad fortune. Too bad he couldn't make it to a PD precinct.
We won't know, because he had no gun, so the gang of thugs were able to drag him out of his car and beat him. The only reason that he and his family are still alive is because of a bystander who got in the way and got the thugs to stop.
Personally, I think that after the gun had come out, the violence would have stopped without a shot being fired -- no thug is all that eager to be the first one shot.
Car was the better weapon anyway
He didn't run into stopped traffic, he and his family were targeted by a group of motorcyclists, who surrounded their car, while one got in front and brake-checked.
A gun might not have decreased the violence of the outcome, but it would quite likely have put the violence onto the thugs who started it instead of onto the family they chose to victimize, and that works for me.
http://news.yahoo.com/da-motorcyclist-had-key-role-nyc-suv-brawl-213733153.htmlLien was on the ground when bystander Sergio Consuegra stepped in between him and the bikers…Consuegra, who's in his 50s, was on his way to church when he saw the encounter.
He spread his arms to shield the driver and told the bikers: "That's it, guys. Let it go. That's it. Let it go," he said. The bikers backed off, and Consuegra called police.
He absolutely did run into stopped traffic. That's when they beat out his window and dragged him out of the car. I watched it with my own eyes (the video).
Oh I thought you meant what started it all.
Yes, if not for the stopped traffic, he could have kept going, maybe long enough for the cops to bring guns and save him.
You can drive a long way on the rim, especially on pavement.
Running didn't help, and thanks to the hoplophobes, he had no other option when his wife and daughter were in danger.
You can drive a long way on the rim, especially on pavement.
Running didn't help, and thanks to the hoplophobes, he had no other option when his wife and daughter were in danger.
I guarantee there were guns in the gang because there were cops and corrections officers there. It would have been a 1:? shoot out. NYPD kill you for pulling a sandwich much less a gun.
I'm not a cop but I'm guessing a civilian taking a light beating doesn't rise to the level of compromising an undercover operation.
If the undercover LEOs were "investigating" the biker gang for what exactly were they waiting? They weren't going to apprehend the miscreants until they actually killed someone?