Not craving a participation trophy at all, I was just a bit incredulous that it seems some people either don't read the thread to realize things have been linked prior (my response to Daleandee) or don't read/do basic research to find answers to questions they have (my response to Ghery). To be clear, I don't think the link I originally posted answers your question as I did not link it in response to yours, but rather one asking what school & fraternity he went to. I actually agree with you, it's a typical puff piece to try and make the fraternity look good/relevant but it does in fact answer the questions I originally linked it to answer.I was going to quote Daleandee instead of you and deny you the participation trophy you crave, but I'm in a good mood.
I shouldn't be, as I just read that puff piece for the second time, and still didn't see a mention of any specific legal accomplishment or novelty in his career. Frankly I'm not sure I'd classify much of the hand-wavery there as any sort of legal mention at all, but he apparently spoke with a legal trade publication journalist once, so I'll give half credit.
Did I overlook something twice?
From the link the OP posted....amazing what you can learn if you read.
African American and LGBT - ticking all the right boxes so let’s say hurray for merit based promotions.
So from his bio, pasted below, that was your only takeaway? How about everything that I bolded? None of that merits his selection?
As the FAA’s Chief Counsel, Marc Nichols provides legal advice for all aspects of agency operations and works closely with the Department of Transportation’s Office of General Counsel on issues of national significance to the aviation industry. Marc has more than two decades of extensive experience in the legal, technology, aerospace, and defense industries.
Marc most recently served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for Saab businesses in North America, and as the chief legal officer of the company in the United States and Canada.
Prior to his tenure with Saab, Marc served as Director of Compliance & Global Legal Counsel at Rolls-Royce in its defense sector, helping lead legal efforts in helicopter aerospace, compliance, ethics, and government investigations. He previously served as Inspector General at the U.S. Government Printing Office, worked for various law firms, and is the former vice chair of the Aerospace Industries Association Legal Committee.
The native New Yorker is a graduate of the Washington and Lee University Law School in Virginia, and holds a B.A. from Wabash College in Indiana. In May 2018, Marc became only the second elected African American as well as the second LGBT president of the Wabash College Alumni Association in the college’s 200-year existence.
Do you really believe that his race and sexuality are the only reasons he was hired?There are dozens and dozens of people with similar credentials so yeah, nice try …
Of course not the only but unfortunately we are back to reality where “correct” race and other completely unrelated but “politically suitable” credentials are certainly making a difference - especially for highly visible positions.Do you really believe that his race and sexuality are the only reasons he was hired?
Do you really believe that his race and sexuality are the only reasons he was hired?
Not craving a participation trophy at all, I was just a bit incredulous that it seems some people either don't read the thread to realize things have been linked prior (my response to Daleandee) or don't read/do basic research to find answers to questions they have (my response to Ghery).
He’s black AND gay? Cool. I had a few gay black friends back in the day. Good people. Of course, I’m sure this guy wouldn’t have got this appointment despite being black and gay if he belonged to the wrong political party. Or did I miss that part in the link?
Ask people in HR departments why they started including stuff like “women, people of color, and LGBTQ people are encouraged to apply” in their job descriptions and you will have your answer.Why do those two factors need to be a part of the conversation? Most of us don't run around proclaiming our color, sexual preference, religious beliefs, wealth status, etc.
I don't care for the guy but that's just a thing I have about lawyers ...
Why do those two factors need to be a part of the conversation? Most of us don't run around proclaiming our color, sexual preference, religious beliefs, wealth status, etc.
I don't care for the guy but that's just a thing I have about lawyers ...
They don’t, but when the source is the one that introduces it in a public bio, is it verboten for anyone else to comment on the source’s own description of who they are and their successes?
I can remember when the military masked official photos and I couldn’t tell you how long it’s been since demographic data was suppressed from promotion boards specifically to remove visual/appearance bias from the selection process.
Most of us actually do, unless you avoid any mention of your family, no photos on your desk or in your wallet where someone might see when you pay your lunch bill, and you completely cover your skin somehow...Most of us don't run around proclaiming our color, sexual preference...
Most of us actually do, unless you avoid any mention of your family, no photos on your desk or in your wallet where someone might see when you pay your lunch bill, and you completely cover your skin somehow...
It's just that those of us who are white and straight never have to give it much thought... others? Not so much.
Paul
So this would be equivalent to him having pictures of his family on his desk or in his wallet. That's not what anyone is talking about.Most of us actually do, unless you avoid any mention of your family, no photos on your desk or in your wallet where someone might see when you pay your lunch bill, and you completely cover your skin somehow...
Most of us actually do, unless you avoid any mention of your family, no photos on your desk or in your wallet where someone might see when you pay your lunch bill, and you completely cover your skin somehow...
It's just that those of us who are white and straight never have to give it much thought... others? Not so much.
Paul
No one ever questions the process when a straight white male gets the job, but when a minority gets the job, questions and snarky comments abound.
You are about 20 years behind the curve …No one ever questions the process when a straight white male gets the job, but when a minority gets the job, questions and snarky comments abound.
No one ever questions the process when a straight white male gets the job, but when a minority gets the job, questions and snarky comments abound.
It's more about how the story is written. It isn't that John Doe got the job. It's the John Doe is the first ever gay, black, trans, whatever to be hired, aren't we so socially conscious, look at us, headline. It becomes about those details, when it becomes about those details. These things shouldn't matter, but then they do?
No one ever announces that they hired a white, straight male in the press release, either.No one ever questions the process when a straight white male gets the job, but when a minority gets the job, questions and snarky comments abound.
I’m curious. If the Knights of Columbus posts a story about the first Italian-American XXX, do you automatically assume he/she is unqualified? Also the FAA press release mostly discussed his 20 years of experience with Saab, Rolls Royce, and other aspects of the transportation industry. The AA/LGBT aspect was only mentioned in the last paragraph…
No one ever announces that they hired a white, straight male in the press release, either.
I assume everyone who mentions anything other than qualifications has an ulterior motive.
Agree. It might not have been his choice to play up that aspect, or it might have. I'll say that I dislike being used in that way. I would rather people not notice, and especially not highlight, my race or gender.It's more about how the story is written. It isn't that John Doe got the job. It's the John Doe is the first ever gay, black, trans, whatever to be hired, aren't we so socially conscious, look at us, headline. It becomes about those details, when it becomes about those details. These things shouldn't matter, but then they do?
You don't think it's the least bit weird that his official government bio mentions who he likes to have sex with?I’m curious. If the Knights of Columbus posts a story about the first Italian-American XXX, do you automatically assume he/she is unqualified? Also the FAA press release mostly discussed his 20 years of experience with Saab, Rolls Royce, and other aspects of the transportation industry. The AA/LGBT aspect was only mentioned in the last paragraph…
…
If you read a "first XXXX to..." type of announcement about a person, and immediately jump to the conclusion that they must not deserve to be there, then... well, it says more about YOU than it does about the person in question…t
You don't think it's the least bit weird that his official government bio mentions who he likes to have sex with?
The fact that someone is a woman, specific race, like to have sex this or that way is not an accomplishment of any kind - that just came free with the package, whatever that package happens to be …so tell me what exactly are you proud of ?Well, may I suggest to stop assuming that.
Sometimes people are proud of being the "first XXXX" to accomplish something.
Sometimes other people are proud on their behalf.
There are all kinds of reasons that a person, or a wiki page, or a news article, might choose to include such a detail.
If you read a "first XXXX to..." type of announcement about a person, and immediately jump to the conclusion that they must not deserve to be there, then... well, it says more about YOU than it does about the person in question.
-- First woman, and first American, to winter-over for the AMANDA experiment
But it doesn't mention that he's married to his high-school sweetheart. It doesn't mention whether he's married at all. So your analogy fails. It's more like if he was hetero and it mentioned that he's an ass man or likes blonds, or just said he was straight. But you'll never see that in a professional bio; it's reserved for dating profiles.Like if it had mentioned that he had been married to his High School sweetheart for 20 years? We never have to read that stuff about straight people…
Well, may I suggest to stop assuming that.
Sometimes people are proud of being the "first XXXX" to accomplish something.
...
The fact that someone is a woman, specific race, like to have sex this or that way, is not an accomplishment of any kind - that just came free with the package, whatever that package happens to be …so tell me what exactly are you proud of ?
years ago I read a quote from Bill Russell, (iirc, the first black coach of the Boston Celtics), a sportswriter made some comment about how much progress Boston had made wrt race relations... Bill responded with something like: we'll have made real progress when it isn't noteworthy.
I wish I could find that quote...
Good question.
I''d be proud of overcoming obstacles.
Don't give me the tired "there are no obstacles anymore, society is all prejudice-free these days" line that I hear all the time on this board. I know better. Just one indication is the hostility and judgement on display in this very thread, towards a stranger about whom y'all know next to nothing.
I'd be proud to have paved the way for others to come after me in some way.
It's a kind of honor, and one that comes with increased scrutiny. Such a distinction --sought out or not-- is not without its price. A price that another that does not "come with the package" would not have to pay. Again, re-read this thread from the beginning and ask yourself if this FAA guy is facing a kind of scrutiny that others would not have to endure. Clearly he is.
People are allowed to be proud of all kinds of things, without some objective standard of it being an "accomplishment" that YOU get to dictate or define. People are proud of things their kids do. Of staying married for a long time. Of having the courage to be gay and out. Of their vintage car in the garage. Of their cultural heritage. Let people be proud of stuff. Jeez.