NA - Photo hosting sites

N659HB

N659HB

En-Route
Joined
Jul 20, 2013
Messages
2,511
Location
Lather, rinse repeat!
Display Name
Display name:
Pops
I've been storing my sharable pics for years on Photobucket. Now they want $400/yr to provide 3rd party "hosting." Too steep for me. Any no-cost/low-cost alternatives?
 
shutterfly.com has held my thousands of photos, for free, for maybe a decade (well they bought out kodakshare I think).
All I have to do is occasionally see an ad.
 
I've used all mentioned above expect imgur. I also currently have zenfolio for my professional photography site.
They each have pros and cons. Google photo is decent but they limit file size for free version.
Flickr is/was a yahoo product and it's future may be in limbo.
 
I've used smugmug.com for years, it is not free but reasonably low cost. Around $50/yr if I remember correctly.
 
Not sure what you mean by "shareable pics", but I use tinypic for posting stuff here.
 
Google Drive or Photos
 
N659HB said:
I've been storing my sharable pics for years on Photobucket. Now they want $400/yr to provide 3rd party "hosting." Too steep for me. Any no-cost/low-cost alternatives?
Click to expand...
Wow, PB finally came out of the (skeleton) closet. Took them a while. They've been going downhill for a few years now, this step does not surprise me. Reminds me of the WebShots fiasco. :)

I second Flick. Worst case scenario, MS will roll it into OneDrive or something.
 
BigBadLou said:
I second Flick. Worst case scenario, MS will roll it into OneDrive or something.
Click to expand...

If you meant Flickr, that's owned by Yahoo, which has just been acquired by Verizon.
 
I had been using Photobucket message-board photos for the last several years. I have a free account and have thus been putting up with annoying full-page ads that slowed down the site to a crawl, and near-daily spamming emails from Photobucket.

Then a couple of weeks ago came an e-mail from Photobucket: "Some features on your account have been disabled. We noticed that you have been using Photobucket for 3rd party hosting. [...] Our Terms of Service does [sic] not allow 3rd party hosting with your current account level." It appears they have just changed the TOS to make the ad-filled "free" account essentially worthless.

Then they helpfully suggest, "To restore your 3rd party hosted images, please upgrade to a Plus 500 Plan."

That's $399 a year. Payable in advance.

Arrivaderci, Photobucket.
 
Last edited:
dmspilot said:
If you meant Flickr, that's owned by Yahoo, which has just been acquired by Verizon.
Click to expand...
I must be getting old, I would swear that Yahoo was bought by MS. (which explains why it started going downhill so drastically, just like Skype and other competitors that MS bought out to destroy)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top