Sincerely not trying to pot stir. Only bring this up to gather opinions from those of you owners of airframes which rely on single source PMA holders for continued longevity (Fletch for AA-xx, Webco for Comanches, et al).
What are y'alls views/projections on your current ownership stint looking 10 years into the future? How do these PMA holders look like in terms of their economic viability, or even outright desire to continue to remain in the market? I know that's kinda of a wonky ownership consideration on here, since most people just look at performance numbers as the end all be all for their recreational ownership, but I find it a rather critical consideration when it comes to "forever airplanes".
I'm just trying to understand the calculus and/or how the PMA sole source businesses operating motivation/incentive works in the first place. Hard to place that much continued airworthiness capital, hell outright fiat imo, on an airframe support proposition that could get mothballed overnight and whose OEM has long abandoned. Genuinely interested in the topic.
