Fearless Tower
Touchdown! Greaser!
Computers are so smart, they think they know what we're thinking.
Not sure how ‘smart’ they are. Never have I meant to say ‘ducking’....
Computers are so smart, they think they know what we're thinking.
Just because an airplane is old doesn’t mean it’s best to crap.No wonder so many of them are beat to (fecal matter), these things are ancient.
I read about y'all struggling to find a decent airplane to buy, and it makes me think back 35 years ago when my father was looking for a used Skyhawk. I was thinking how he didn't have nearly the difficulties I hear about today, and then I realized what the problem is. It's that so many of you are trying to buy the same airframes that were around back then. Not the same type of airframes, but the exact same airframes that were available in 1981. No wonder so many of them are beat to (fecal matter), these things are ancient.
Just because an airplane is old doesn’t mean it’s best to crap.
I am the caretaker for 3 ancient aeroplanes: an 85 year old, a 77 year old and a 58 year old. They are hardly beat to crap.
No but the odds are much higher that it’ll be crap each year.
My airplane is only younger than myself by a few years and my hair has all turned white. Granted my hair was destined to do that, dad’s started turning white at 35 and I wasn’t far off of that.
Point is, they’re old enough if they were on the road, they’d have collector license plates on them. And some have seen a lot of miles.
Noted...
But wait, the Yankee is slower than what? Not a 150 or 152 and definitely faster than a Skyhawk all on 6 gph. If I pass on the Mooney now, at least Ill have something that reportedly, flies like one.
The Tecnam P-92 is faster than a Skyhawk. So is the Remos, CT, LS-1, Sport Cruiser........ Hmmmm. I'm seeing a pattern here.
Just because an airplane is old doesn’t mean it’s best to crap.
I am the caretaker for 3 ancient aeroplanes: an 85 year old, a 77 year old and a 58 year old. They are hardly beat to crap.
Hope it goes well. Cherokees might be slow, but flying slow beats not flying.
Hope the A&P rolls a good perception check on your prebuy. Did you ask his WIS stat before going with him?
It's a nerd thing, dungeons and dragons. Just a little humor wishing you luckNo, I don't even know what WIS stat means. Help me out here
It's a nerd thing, dungeons and dragons. Just a little humor wishing you luck
Thanks. I'm seeing ~108 kts @2450 rpm at 3.5K. Today I had her pulled back to 2300. Pic from today flying up to Princeton Ky. Flew my bro over his lake house on Lake Barkley then went for pizza at Pagliai’s in Princeton. For the SE crew, it is run by folks from Chicago and is the real deal. 2M0Nice airplane... Its funny as I started skimming through the thread I was going to comment on "Why not a 140!" I have part ownership in one with a 160HP/Powerflow STC and a cruise prop. Just out of overhaul shes indicating close to 115 in cruise. Great do everything airplane in my opinion, aside from that pesky C Of G.
Keep on keeping on. It will all come together. Eventually.
Nice...and as a reference, my '66 140 (we are 204 serial numbers apart, but for some reason mine, N4161J, has a higher serial number but lower N number, even though it is technically a '66) has mods to the hilt, and I don't see much better than 108 at 2450.Thanks. I'm seeing ~108 kts @2450 rpm at 3.5K. Today I had her pulled back to 2300. Pic from today flying up to Princeton Ky. Flew my bro over his lake house on Lake Barkley then went for pizza at Pagliai’s in Princeton. For the SE crew, it is run by folks from Chicago and is the real deal. 2M0
View attachment 62784
Certainly there are some older airplanes in spectacular shape. However, entropy tends to have its way, particularly if your airplane sits outside,and there are lots of places in this country where hangars are scarce and expensive.