- Joined
- May 11, 2010
- Messages
- 20,775
- Location
- Charlotte, NC
- Display Name
Display name:
Snorting his way across the USA
Logging PIC time
- Thread starter saracelica
- Start date
poadeleted20
Deleted
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 31,250
The used to, but I don't know how many are still flying.
Jaybird180
Final Approach
The link cited at least one example. I didn't bother verifying if it's still in the FAA database.
cirrusmx
Line Up and Wait
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2011
- Messages
- 794
- Location
- Boston, Massachussetts
- Display Name
Display name:
campoalavista
from the above link:
"The initial climb rate of the Lancer 402 was just 642 feet/minute, and its single engine altitude could only be maintained down to 2,000 feet msl. So, an engine out below this figure resulted in descent even with full power on the operating engine, and a quick look for a suitable emergency landing field. One has to question whether this aircraft design with fixed pitch props could even be type certificated now..."
This guy had the potential to kill a lot of lawyer and maybe some doctors. Horrible perfomance.
"The initial climb rate of the Lancer 402 was just 642 feet/minute, and its single engine altitude could only be maintained down to 2,000 feet msl. So, an engine out below this figure resulted in descent even with full power on the operating engine, and a quick look for a suitable emergency landing field. One has to question whether this aircraft design with fixed pitch props could even be type certificated now..."
This guy had the potential to kill a lot of lawyer and maybe some doctors. Horrible perfomance.