In August 2021 a Champ crashed at Flying Oaks Airport in Texas killing two people. The crash was attributed to high density altitude and being 200 pounds overweight. Dan Gryder released three videos discussing the crash, claiming that the owner of Flying Oaks Airport, Charles Cook, was directly responsible for the crash. He stated Cook had handpropped the aircraft at the start of the accident flight, accused Cook of coaching the Champ pilot how to take off overweight, and claimed the airport was full of unlicensed pilots, had been a source of illegal activity and had been reported to the FAA numerous times, that Cook destroyed the aircraft logbooks, and that Cook was having an affair. The source of Gryder's information was two previous airport tenants that had been evicted several weeks earlier. The two men were not present at the airport during the crash and were not witnesses to the crash.
But the owner, Charles Cook, also was not present during the crash. He had been in the hospital for several weeks preceding the crash, and on the day of the crash, was at home asleep hooked up to an oxygen machine. There was no way he could have "helped" the accident aircraft take-off. Witnesses reported going to Cook's home to notify him of the accident and bringing him to the airport. Gryder never questioned Cook or any of the actual witnesses before publishing his videos.
Cook filed a slander and defamation lawsuit against Gryder. The first hearing was March 2022 and Gryder did not show up. The judge gave a default judgment to Cook. A hearing for damages was set for September to award damages and penalties. Gryder hired an attorney. Gryder also did not show up at the September hearing, but his attorney did, and filed a motion to vacate the default judgment due to Gryder not receiving the notice for the March hearing (even though Gryder had texted Cook a year before about the lawfirm Cook had hired). The judge stated he would grant the motion to vacate unless the plaintiff could provide expert testimony that Gryder had opened the email summons. The judge set a new hearing for June 2023 to discuss the motion. Meanwhile, mediation was attempted, but Gryder's attorney asked to be excused from representing Gryder, which was granted. Several months later, the plaintiff's email expert was able to prove Gryder had received the summons.
At the June hearing, Gryder said he didn't understand what was happening or why he was there. The judge asked Gryder if he was going to hire another attorney, and Gryder said no, he would represent himself. The judge asked Gryder to argue for the motion to vacate the judgment and Gryder said he didn't understand. The judge ruled in favor of the plaintiff and set the hearing to set the damages for August 2023. There were settlement discussions between Gryder and the plaintiff's representation. Gryder offered to settle by making an apology video, and this offer was rejected. Settlement discussions stalled and Gryder said he had no money and refused to settle. Gryder did not show up at the August 2023 hearing. At this hearing plaintiff demonstrated that due to Gryder's videos, the airport had lost revenue and Cook's reputation as an airline pilot had been damaged. The judge awarded Cook slightly over $1 million.