Hey guys, Just getting back into flying after a 10 year break. I see now that there is so much out there for androids and Ipad. I was wondering if it is worth having an Ipad or Android tablet with 3G or is WiFi only, sufficient for regular use?
I've been wondering the same myself... the built-in GPS is not as accurate as the external devices, and the only reason I am even considering an iPad at all is for Foreflight. That's all it will be used for, I have no need for the device otherwise (boy do I wish they had it for Android).
But then I'm adding another $300/yr to my $150/yr Foreflight subscription, which makes it more significant. In essence, I am now forced to shell out $450/yr for this app (in addition to the insane buy-in cost, $700 or so for the stupid device).
So for now I've stayed with my paper charts, even though I really do want to have Foreflight.
I've been wondering the same myself... the built-in GPS is not as accurate as the external devices, and the only reason I am even considering an iPad at all is for Foreflight. That's all it will be used for, I have no need for the device otherwise (boy do I wish they had it for Android).
But then I'm adding another $300/yr to my $150/yr Foreflight subscription, which makes it more significant. In essence, I am now forced to shell out $450/yr for this app (in addition to the insane buy-in cost, $700 or so for the stupid device).
So for now I've stayed with my paper charts, even though I really do want to have Foreflight.
Very much a personal choice. I opted for WiFi only on my iPad with a plan to use an external GPS. That was this past spring. So far, I haven't missed the 3G capability even once.
You have never found a airport where they did not have wireless and you needed the weather and to file a flight plan?
1-800-WX-BRIEF from my cellphone. A little known fact, people were able to function before the Internet and wireless data connections.You have never found a airport where they did not have wireless and you needed the weather and to file a flight plan?
So you're subscribing to the geo-referenced charts in addition to the base subscription? My A&T subscription (assuming I have it turned on all year, which I don't) is an additional $180/yr. And it's rarely "turned on", only when I'm traveling and know I won't be anywhere near wi-fi. Last time that happened was over the July4th holiday and I was staying with relatives who think high-tech is the tv remote.I've been wondering the same myself... the built-in GPS is not as accurate as the external devices, and the only reason I am even considering an iPad at all is for Foreflight. That's all it will be used for, I have no need for the device otherwise (boy do I wish they had it for Android).
But then I'm adding another $300/yr to my $150/yr Foreflight subscription, which makes it more significant. In essence, I am now forced to shell out $450/yr for this app (in addition to the insane buy-in cost, $700 or so for the stupid device).
So for now I've stayed with my paper charts, even though I really do want to have Foreflight.
So you're subscribing to the geo-referenced charts in addition to the base subscription?
Of course I have. I'm in Colorado. Plenty or rural airports with limited facilities.You have never found a airport where they did not have wireless and you needed the weather and to file a flight plan?
You're understanding it right.Well, I'm not subscribing to anything yet, that's the point
So what do geo-referenced charts do? is this the only difference between the versions?
EDIT: OK, went and looked on the FF site. Seems like this is the feature that my 182 transition instructor showed me recently that got me really awed - where you can actually see yourself in reference to the chart as you're moving. Or am I understanding this wrong?
1-800-WX-BRIEF from my cellphone. A little known fact, people were able to function before the Internet and wireless data connections.
1-800-WX-BRIEF from my cellphone. A little known fact, people were able to function before the Internet and wireless data connections.
So does the external GPS work with the wifi only model, or does it need the the 3g???
That's right. Although I think the 30-pin dock connector isn't technically referred to as a usb connector; a lot of people wish the iPad had the ability to accept a usb connection.The external GPS uses Blue Tooth for communication with the iPad, not wifi or 3G! It works independent of wifi or 3G.
Edit: This applies only to the Dual Electronics GPS unit. I believe Bad Elf is wired via the USB connector.
Sure. If you can find one these daysyeah, I kinda like technology
cellphone? why not use a payphone
I have the 3G model and know quite a few people that regret getting the wifi only one. Say you fly somewhere and want to use it as a gps in the car. The maps app has to pull the map data from somewhere. It uses the 3G connection for that. What if you want to look up a hotel phone number on the road. 3G again. Surf the net in the hotel and not pay $15 per night? 3G. It's not much more money and you can't ever add it later. Let's face it, if you have to worry over the additional cost of the 3G iPad, you probably should rethink the whole flying thing and take up a cheaper hobby.
Onwards,
If you only fly locally then why are you even considering electronic charts? Buy your one local chart per cycle and be done with it. I have an iPad with 3G and foreflight because I travel. It works better than anything else for that. Hands down. You may not like apple but it's so far out in front for this use it's not even funny.
Okay, this got my attention. I am not sure that I understand this. Does the "that" in the last sentence refer to the GPS info from an external GPS, or from the iPad 3G?With the iPad if you want to use the geolocation feature on things like maps and plates you need the 3G or else you will have to also add an external GPS. But you do not need a 3G subscription to get that GPS information.
You can use the internal GPS of a 3G equipped iPad for the geolocated charts. The geolocation feature works with the internal GPS and without a 3G subscription just fine. That is exactly what I have and do not have a problem with it at all. No need for an external GPS when you have a 3G equipped iPad.Okay, this got my attention. I am not sure that I understand this. Does the "that" in the last sentence refer to the GPS info from an external GPS, or from the iPad 3G?
I've been "eyeing" (pun intended) the iPad ever since I started reading about ForeFlight. Even though I have a GNS 480 and a GMX-200 MFD with nav database subscriptions for both from Jeppesen, I do NOT have a terrain subscription for the MFD and have not updated the terrain DB since I bought the plane. Currently if I'm flying at an altitude where I need to worry about obstacles, I revert to the finger-on-the-chart method. So it would be very nice to have geo-referenced, updated electronic charts at a reasonable price, but since I'm already paying about $700/yr for the Jepp subscriptions, I really don't want to pay 50% more for that capability, it just wouldn't be worth it to me. I already have XM weather on the MFD and don't really need the iPad for internet access for flight planning purposes, though it would be nice.
However, if I can have geo-referencing for the entry cost of an iPad 3G plus the still very low FF subscription price, I'd consider it a good value.
You can use the internal GPS of a 3G equipped iPad for the geolocated charts. The geolocation feature works with the internal GPS and without a 3G subscription just fine. That is exactly what I have and do not have a problem with it at all. No need for an external GPS when you have a 3G equipped iPad.
I don't have you anti-Apple issue (or rather I do but FF is so good I bought the iPad for it).That last is really missing the point, as far as I'm concerned.
I don't "have to worry" about it, in terms of funds availability, but I never have and never will spend needlessly or without care. I am frugal, always have been, and always will be, and thus I pay attention to expenses - sometimes in ways you might not expect.
Let's simplify.Okay, this got my attention. I am not sure that I understand this. Does the "that" in the last sentence refer to the GPS info from an external GPS, or from the iPad 3G?
That last is really missing the point, as far as I'm concerned.
I don't "have to worry" about it, in terms of funds availability, but I never have and never will spend needlessly or without care. I am frugal, always have been, and always will be, and thus I pay attention to expenses - sometimes in ways you might not expect. Personal (that is, non-deductible) expenses I tend to be more anal about.
So, getting back to the topic at hand, spending $700 upfront and what amounts to $450 every year (FF+either ATT 3G, which I think is cheapest at $25/mo) for a single piece of software makes me take pause. Considering that much of my travel is local, so I don't need a chart to get there, the end result is that having Foreflight adds about $10 per hour to my flying costs. I'm not certain it's worth it. I don't have any other uses for the iPad at all. Add to that my intense dislike the entire Apple ecosystem, where I generally stay away from its products, and you see that I have a significant barrier to entry, psychologically.
And as I'm writing this, I'm paying attention to my internal reaction and realizing that's really my one major hangup. If FF was available on Android, I wouldn't care and just get it, with an accompanying device and 3G sub. It's that I have to buy something from Apple that is causing me grief. So yeah, ignore the rest, this is nothing anyone can help with reasoned (or unreasoned) arguments.
Any chance of FF ever appearing on Android?
That's right. Although I think the 30-pin dock connector isn't technically referred to as a usb connector; a lot of people wish the iPad had the ability to accept a usb connection.