denverpilot
Tied Down
That is incorrect. The proposed airborne phone use is not using the ground-based cellular network. It is using a picocell installed in the airplane and a non-cellular air-ground link from the airplane to the ground and/or satellite. The airborne picocell prevents phones in the airplane, which still must be in airplane mode when below 10,000', from attempting to connect to ground-based cells which would cause the interference already discussed.
No it's not incorrect. FCC is well down the path of not giving a flying (ahem) about what people do with cell phones in flight.
All the rest of that you posted is what OTHER people are thinking about and planning. Not FCC. They don't care.
They do, unlike older analog systems, once the phone is at a high enough altitude. That is why service drops off at a much lower altitude than it did on the analog systems. The problem continues to exist when a call is made at lower altitudes.
Exactly. The network takes care of itself now. The variables that trigger a phone to shut down are not public, but if you're high enough you're causing a problem, your phone is simply told to stop transmitting.
My post had absolutely no commentary on what people are planning to do once the law is removed. Nor do I care. My point was that the OWT of cell phones "blocking" the network hasn't been true for at least two decades on properly engineered networks. The carriers have been able to shut down individual phones for a long time.