azblackbird
Pattern Altitude
FF is the pioneer in SAAS for the pilot crowd. Garmin is getting there. Jepp due to their bloat, will eventually get there. It's all good!
I suspect that if the airlines didn't require the operator-specific customization services that Jeppesen provides, they would be using government charts too.
Yep. For more than one reason. Obvious that the free US government charts don't cover over countries. Other countries may charge for them and multiple countries mean multiple contracts. Different countries have different formats.There are airlines using ForeFlight and government plates. The issue is with international operations.
I haven't played with FlightDeck in about 5 years but AFAIK, they have had georeferenced approach plates fir at least 3 years. From the FlightDeck manual discussion on terminal procedures:I may be completely wrong here, and I am sure someone on this board will be quick to tell me if I am but I thought I read somewhere that Jeppesen's approach plates were not scaled properly, or not to scale, which would make georeferencing and superimposing the approach plate on charts impossible.
Do you realize that full Jepp electronic chart subscription for the whole US is almost $500?I wouldn't see this happening as you describe. What I see occurring is that we pay for the Jepp database via JeppDirect.com and obtain a "you paid for it" token that FF can use to connect (much like we can connect to 1800WXBRIEF for our weather brief and to file flight plans). As far as FF's monetizing, it would be part of their "Pro Plus" Pricing.
Jepp charts are great....if you can afford them. The average recreation GA pilot has zero interest in paying that kind of money.I voted "no," although there is probably (unlikely) a price point where I might.
Like a lot of folks, I was bitten by the Jepp bug. Better quality paper, arguably clearer presentation, and, of course, they were cool since the airlines used them. (It also helped that Jepp was down the street - almost literally - and I had friends who worked there.) I'd switch between the two; no big deal.
I went back to FAA charts full time when they appeared in EFBs. The paper difference became irrelevant. With such things as the briefing strip, some topography, etc, the FAA charts improved enough that the differences are, to me, anyway, small. Maybe not completely inconsequential, but like the difference between XM Weather and ADS-B, not worth the cost difference.
You might want to update your data base.Do you realize that full Jepp electronic chart subscription for the whole US is almost $500?
Go see my comment immediately before your question.Is Jepp still part of Boeing? Or on their own?
What does a non-WAAS data card (what you linked) have to do with the discussion?You might want to update your data base.
http://jeppdirect.jeppesen.com/main/store/product_listing_template.jsp?catId=cat950002_ca
Well if you can't navigate a website, charts probably wont help you. You might notice the price for the full US is no where near $500.
http://ww1.jeppesen.com/aviation/microsite/terminal-charts-garmin-pilot/index.jsp#getting-started
I prefer gov plates myself.
I'll use either one, but I like options. Plus for teaching, it'd be nice to show students the Jepp stuff just so they've seen it... before they HAVE to use them somewhere for a job.
True, but for the job aspect, they'll cover than in indoc/sim training.
Understood, but might as well show them one sometime before that. No need to go into it deeply, but so many folks getting sucked up these days quickly who haven't been around long enough to remember the "joy" of keeping paper Jepp subscriptions updated... LOL...
Then you'll have to tell them to give me my $50 back.
The charts are still FREE.
Why should anybody else but you do that?
You're complaining about $100 for VFR, Terminal, IFR charts, WAC and approach plates? What would YOU charge?
Is that supposed to be an answer?FF is more polished, but there are apps where you can get all that free. FltPlan GO has really improved their interface the last two years.
Is that supposed to be an answer?