I wrote a "What Plane For My Mission" App

WannFly said:
As a non paying future customer of this app I am livid that the deadline has not been met. I will be drunk in few mins and won't know the difference between archer and arrow soon (not that I know it now)

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Click to expand...


I'd be done with it but MVC is STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPID and ineffecient.
I can't believe how technology evolves sometimes.

I could have written this whole thing in about 5 hours using webforms.
This is a language I'll not be adopting for real world projects.
 
SixPapaCharlie said:
I'd be done with it but MVC is STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPID and ineffecient.
I can't believe how technology evolves sometimes.

I could have written this whole thing in about 5 hours using webforms.
This is a language I'll not be adopting for real world projects.
Click to expand...
Yeah blame the language ...lol.. well kinda agree with ya, MVC is not the most efficient

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
 
SixPapaCharlie said:
Good point maybe not mission but more what fits the criteria I am interested.
I personally want a fixed gear low wing flying behind an O360
So Grummans, Archers, Cherokees, Some Musketeers

Mission might not be the best word more of a performance search engine.
Click to expand...

Yeah, you don't want a Mooney like mine. Those Pipers have a lot more room to get the oil filter off the back of the O-360.
 
SixPapaCharlie said:
I'd be done with it but MVC is STOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOPID and ineffecient.
I can't believe how technology evolves sometimes.

I could have written this whole thing in about 5 hours using webforms.
This is a language I'll not be adopting for real world projects.
Click to expand...

MVC is an architecture or a design pattern, not a language. People use MVC with Java and C# among others. It's useful for something more complex that what you're doing here, it's overkill for simple stuff.
 
Suspect he's talking about ASP.NET, not the pattern.
 
Yep, C# (ASP.NET)
It is IMO unnecessarily complicated.

I am old. I like webforms. Simple simple simple.
I have reached the point where I could no longer code for a living.
This is too frustrating. It reminds me of doing C++ in Unix back in college.
We sort of evolved away from that and now we seem to be going backwards.
 
I managed to avoid most tech fashion cycles by sticking with c and unix for 20 years. Just need to stay in the game until 2038...
 
SixPapaCharlie said:
Yep, C# (ASP.NET)
It is IMO unnecessarily complicated.

I am old. I like webforms. Simple simple simple.
I have reached the point where I could no longer code for a living.
This is too frustrating. It reminds me of doing C++ in Unix back in college.
We sort of evolved away from that and now we seem to be going backwards.
Click to expand...

You're not old. I'm 59, I still work with this stuff when I can get away from SQL for a few hours. There is a lot going on in a larger scale ASP.net application. You have a view, which is what the user sees, and there will be C# code in there, and probably some sort of view engine code as well, We use Razor, which looks something like HTML. Chances are you need some Javascript (not to be confused with the Java language) to make things happen in the user's browser, so some of that shows up there as well, or you can drop it in another file and reference it from your view. Now you have to have a model, which contains the data, and a controller that contains program flow logic, both of which are in C#. It is a lot of stuff going on.
 
Nothing I can't do in VB.NET in half the time. ;)


Edit: which is why I manage IT folks now instead of doing the work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top