Flying-fanatic
Filing Flight Plan
- Joined
- Dec 7, 2024
- Messages
- 2
- Display Name
Display name:
Flying-fanatic
Good morning all! First time poster but a long time listener. I have had a history of PVCs in the past. Back in 21’ I went to a cardiologist for a holter and echo, and had 10,000 PVCs/day. The doctor prescribed toprol and we brought that value down to about 100/day. I reported it to the FAA back in 21’.
Fast forward 3 years later, I received a certified letter from AAM-300 requesting that I undergo a full cardiovascular evaluation to include a 2D echo, 24hr holter, and a nuclear stress test.
I have completed all of the tests with a very favorable result from my cardiologist. I’m 26 so the doctor wasn’t concerned. My holter showed 1 PAC, 14 PVCs (2 couplets), and no pauses/symptoms. Echo showed good function with estimated ejection fraction of 60-65%. Nuclear stress test for just over 9 minutes and achieved 96% of MPHR, both EKG (no arrhythmias) and images negative for ischemia.
Wondered if one of our awesome AMEs like @bbchien could chime in and see if they think that the FAA will be okay with results or if they will require additional testing?
PS: I’ve never had chest pain, and my cardiologist documented that as negative. However, when they ordered the holter they put under indications for monitoring “palpitations, chest pain”. I’ve called and corrected them, and the tech said “oh yeah, we always put that so insurance covers it”. I had them write an addendum saying to disregard that on the report. Should that be okay? The actual cardiologist report shows negative for chest pain.
Thank you!
Fast forward 3 years later, I received a certified letter from AAM-300 requesting that I undergo a full cardiovascular evaluation to include a 2D echo, 24hr holter, and a nuclear stress test.
I have completed all of the tests with a very favorable result from my cardiologist. I’m 26 so the doctor wasn’t concerned. My holter showed 1 PAC, 14 PVCs (2 couplets), and no pauses/symptoms. Echo showed good function with estimated ejection fraction of 60-65%. Nuclear stress test for just over 9 minutes and achieved 96% of MPHR, both EKG (no arrhythmias) and images negative for ischemia.
Wondered if one of our awesome AMEs like @bbchien could chime in and see if they think that the FAA will be okay with results or if they will require additional testing?
PS: I’ve never had chest pain, and my cardiologist documented that as negative. However, when they ordered the holter they put under indications for monitoring “palpitations, chest pain”. I’ve called and corrected them, and the tech said “oh yeah, we always put that so insurance covers it”. I had them write an addendum saying to disregard that on the report. Should that be okay? The actual cardiologist report shows negative for chest pain.
Thank you!