Gaston's Poker Run (2009)

Ted DuPuis said:
Woah there... you're flying IN the Aztec to Gaston's. You're not flying the Aztec INTO Gaston's. :nono:

Depending on how comfortable I am with it, we may end up landing at Mountain Home and getting taxi service for the rest of y'all anyway.
Click to expand...

But you promised to have your MEI by then :p

Also I said flying the Aztec to Gastons not INTO... I already figured you would go into mountian home (woosie)
 
Last edited:
Missa said:
But you promised to have your MEI by then :p

Also I said fling the Aztec to Gastons not INTO... I already figured you would go into mountian home (woosie)
Click to expand...

Post a copy of the performance charts so the decision can be aired publicly. You know it will get a fair hearing by this group.
 
wabower said:
Absolutely! After all, a big part of the the game of poker includes bluffing and risk-taking. Since hold-em has become part of the TV landscape, everybody knows about all-in. As they say in Arkansas, if you can't run with the big dogs, stay on the porch. :rofl:
Click to expand...

As I posted earlier, taking chances is indeed a part of poker. Taking (unnecessary) chances landing at a short field shouldn't be. IOW I (and a few others) feel that PoA shouldn't put together a situation that encourages risky flying. You should also consider that this wouldn't be a "level playing field" since the risk would be much higher for some combinations of pilots and airplanes than others.
 
lancefisher said:
As I posted earlier, taking chances is indeed a part of poker. Taking (unnecessary) chances landing at a short field shouldn't be. IOW I (and a few others) feel that PoA shouldn't put together a situation that encourages risky flying. You should also consider that this wouldn't be a "level playing field" since the risk would be much higher for some combinations of pilots and airplanes than others.
Click to expand...

You suggesting that a light-weight souped-up taildragger might have an unfair advantage? The event is being held at a field that quite a few have already either expressed reservations or bailed out for other airports based on runway/performance limitations. Why not up the ante for the real card-players, let the wussies stay home and have a horse-shoe pitching contest? Is this an opportunity to display the finest of flying skills, or just a chance to sit in the shade and talk about them?

Or do you think someone might be pulling your leg on this subject?
 
Ted DuPuis said:
Actually, it says on the Gaston's Fly-In website (and has for months) that Pete is taking 271G. It even says under Pete's aircraft listing: "271G (sorry Kent)", so I had thought Pete reserved it long ago.
Click to expand...

No, we don't allow reservations more than 180 days in advance.

Now THAT doesn't sound at all like an abuse of power! :no: :rofl:
Click to expand...

Hey, it's all the power I've got, it'd be a shame not to abuse it once in a while. ;)
 
Ted DuPuis said:
Depending on how comfortable I am with it, we may end up landing at Mountain Home and getting taxi service for the rest of y'all anyway.
Click to expand...

I'd suggest, since you haven't been there before, that you land at BPK, and have one of the rest of us take you in so you can at least see the approach before you have to fly it in a twin. Then, have them fly you right back to the plane and do it yourself, if you so choose. :yes:

I wonder if anyone has ever measured the actual distance between the goal-post trees at the end of the runway? :dunno:
 
wabower said:
....... Why not up the ante for the real card-players, let the wussies stay home and have a horse-shoe pitching contest? Is this an opportunity to display the finest of flying skills, or just a chance to sit in the shade and talk about them?

Or do you think someone might be pulling your leg on this subject?
Click to expand...

Wayne,

This should NOT be about pressing anyone into displaying their flying skills with a short runway and the pressure of a poker run.

Keep the risk on the poker table, keep the flying SAFE. There's just NO upside on adding a short strip to this event.

If you want to test flying skills, do a spot landing contest or a timed/fuel race or something that anyone of any skill level can do without adding risks.
 
flyingcheesehead said:
I'd suggest, since you haven't been there before, that you land at BPK, and have one of the rest of us take you in so you can at least see the approach before you have to fly it in a twin. Then, have them fly you right back to the plane and do it yourself, if you so choose. :yes:
Click to expand...

I think that's a great suggestion...

flyingcheesehead said:
I wonder if anyone has ever measured the actual distance between the goal-post trees at the end of the runway? :dunno:
Click to expand...

I have one of those "walk off" measuring things, but it's small wheel designed for hard surfaces. You'd need one that has a bicycle-style tire, I think.
 
TangoWhiskey said:
I think that's a great suggestion...

I have one of those "walk off" measuring things, but it's small wheel designed for hard surfaces. You'd need one that has a bicycle-style tire, I think.
Click to expand...

Good comments.... if one is unsure, in ANY plane, not necessarily a twin, there's an argument to have an instructor or experience pilot fly with them the first time.

And a lot depends on the plane, winds, etc.

Gastons is a reasonably easy airport to fly into, just as long as one has reasonable skills and has good speed control.

There are very few GA planes that can't get in there, pending nasty weather/winds. But there is a bit of an unusual illusion.
 
Larryo said:
Wayne,

This should NOT be about pressing anyone into displaying their flying skills with a short runway and the pressure of a poker run.

Keep the risk on the poker table, keep the flying SAFE. There's just NO upside on adding a short strip to this event.

If you want to test flying skills, do a spot landing contest or a timed/fuel race or something that anyone of any skill level can do without adding risks.
Click to expand...

Spot landing and speed control skills are self-evident on a 1k' strip. No judging or measuring wheels necessary. Time to put up or shut up, strap it on or check it at the door. Thought this was for real pilots.

PS: Are you paying careful attention to these posts?
 
wabower said:
Spot landing and speed control skills are self-evident on a 1k' strip. No judging or measuring wheels necessary. Time to put up or shut up, strap it on or check it at the door. Thought this was for real pilots.

PS: Are you paying careful attention to these posts?
Click to expand...

Oh, that could be an interesting twist... a unofficial spot landing contest on Saturday, as people are arriving back at Gastons... say 100' west of the goal post trees... offer 1st, 2nd, and 3rd place enhancements to the game, such as "half-price buy-in", ???, ???.
 
Diana said:
Sure! Except, I won't be doing the Poker Run. ;) Although I'm looking forward to flying with you anyway. :yes:
Click to expand...

I'd ask to fly the poker run in your Citabra but I know the answer to that :p (sure miss flying one)

Looking forward to flying with you too! (can we go upside down???? PLEASE????) :smilewinkgrin:
 
flyingcheesehead said:
I wonder if anyone has ever measured the actual distance between the goal-post trees at the end of the runway? :dunno:
Click to expand...

I'm certain it's at least 40 ft because I've never actually brushed the leaves but from the turn to final it looks like about 20 ft. My actual guess would be something in the 80-100 ft range but it's probably getting smaller each year.

-lance
 
wabower said:
Spot landing and speed control skills are self-evident on a 1k' strip. No judging or measuring wheels necessary. Time to put up or shut up, strap it on or check it at the door. Thought this was for real pilots.

PS: Are you paying careful attention to these posts?
Click to expand...

Let's make it a real test and require that the downwind and base legs be flown inverted. Heck for the low wing crowd that should make it easier since their wings won't block the view.
 
lancefisher said:
I'm certain it's at least 40 ft because I've never actually brushed the leaves but from the turn to final it looks like about 20 ft. My actual guess would be something in the 80-100 ft range but it's probably getting smaller each year.
Click to expand...

Good point. Depends on if you measure trunk to trunk or branches to branches.
 
lancefisher said:
I'm certain it's at least 40 ft because I've never actually brushed the leaves but from the turn to final it looks like about 20 ft. My actual guess would be something in the 80-100 ft range but it's probably getting smaller each year.
Click to expand...

My thought was that for someone who hasn't gone in there, they might try to go over the trees rather than between, which would almost certainly result in an overrun accident unless they were flying something that has a very high glide angle and a very short landing roll (ie, Super Cub).
 
flyingcheesehead said:
My thought was that for someone who hasn't gone in there, they might try to go over the trees rather than between, which would almost certainly result in an overrun accident unless they were flying something that has a very high glide angle and a very short landing roll (ie, Super Cub).
Click to expand...

At Gaston's??? Uhh It was several YEARS before I screwed up enough courage to go between the trees. I don't think I ever came CLOSE to an over run.
 
Greg Bockelman said:
At Gaston's??? Uhh It was several YEARS before I screwed up enough courage to go between the trees. I don't think I ever came CLOSE to an over run.
Click to expand...

On my first time there I not only went over the trees, I came in over the ridge (long final). I still had no problem getting stopped. Most flapped airplanes will come down at about a 6 degree angle and if you manage the energy well you can touch down within 100ft of your "aiming point".
 
Greg Bockelman said:
At Gaston's??? Uhh It was several YEARS before I screwed up enough courage to go between the trees. I don't think I ever came CLOSE to an over run.
Click to expand...

It happens quite a bit when I take students or new pilots over there for the first time. The sight picture is not like it is at the airports they're used to, so they tend to stay too high and carry too much airspeed. Remember year before last seeing the guy in the 172 skidding up to the road?
 
Well my problem wasn't the trees, but the fact that it was damn near dark, and I flew my base over the river instead of the powerlines on the other side of the ridge. I ended up way high, and out of position with no daylight left.

The drive back with Steve was just about as exciting as my aborted first approach at Gaston's
 
lancefisher said:
Let's make it a real test and require that the downwind and base legs be flown inverted. Heck for the low wing crowd that should make it easier since their wings won't block the view.
Click to expand...

Now that's what I'm talkin' about.
 
gibbons said:
It happens quite a bit when I take students or new pilots over there for the first time. The sight picture is not like it is at the airports they're used to, so they tend to stay too high and carry too much airspeed. Remember year before last seeing the guy in the 172 skidding up to the road?
Click to expand...

I'm gonna respectfully abstain from this conversation. :redface:
 
kevin47881 said:
I'm gonna respectfully abstain from this conversation. :redface:
Click to expand...

Year before last Kevin, year before last!:nono:

The guy I'm talking about was from the Missouri Pilots Association and wasn't part of our group. It was his second or third attempt at landing. That's all I'm sayin'. :D
 
Greg Bockelman said:
Does it have clear approaches? That is getting to be the short end of my comfort range. Solo with not much fuel would probably be ok, but if it has obstructions, probably not.
Click to expand...

Last year, we had three aboard the Mooney for the poker run. Three aborad, 2000ft grass? No, thanks!
 
Diana said:
Sure! Except, I won't be doing the Poker Run. ;) Although I'm looking forward to flying with you anyway. :yes:
Click to expand...

Cool! Missa, brush up on your backseat landings!!!
 
The five sets of sealed cards were prepared today and will ship tomorrow to the FIVE airports in use this year:

KHRO (Boone County)
KPLK (Taney County)
KFLP (Marion County / Flippin)
KBPK (Ozark Regional / Mountain Home)
KUNO (West Plains Municipal)

We've added a new one--KUNO (UNO--seems appropriate, as we're playing a card game). This 5100' paved runway 41NM NE of Gastons has instrument approaches with a VOR on field. This gives the folks coming in from the east an option to stop at on the way in, to pick up one of their cards.

Remember--you only HAVE to get cards from TWO of the FIVE airports; any extras you pick up are your way of improving your odds of having a good hand---your effort is rewarded with more cards to pick your "best five" from the two to five cards in your hand plus the three shared community cards.

The initial post on this thread has been updated with the new info; the link to the updated/official rules of the game is in that first post, as well.
 
TangoWhiskey said:
The five sets of sealed cards were prepared today and will ship tomorrow to the FIVE airports in use this year:

KHRO (Boone County)
KPLK (Taney County)
KFLP (Marion County / Flippin)
KBPK (Ozark Regional / Mountain Home)
KUNO (West Plains Municipal)
Click to expand...

Don't forget that there is a new Class D airspace just south of PLK, tower freq is 128.15.
 
Dean said:
Don't forget that there is a new Class D airspace just south of PLK, tower freq is 128.15.
Click to expand...

Good call-out, Dean! Make sure you have current charts! [EDIT: It's not on the Kansas City sectional, yet, at least not on the one on SkyVector.com. However, it's CLOSE (5.8nm south) to PLK, and not far from Gaston's either!]

FedEx reports they delivered the cards to three of the airports today: Taney County, Mountain Home, and Marion County.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top