AggieMike88
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2010
- Messages
- 20,804
- Location
- Denton, TX
- Display Name
Display name:
The original "I don't know it all" of aviation.
People have little appreciation how vulnerable they are to security threats, and resolution to security breaches are the OS updates. Read Special Counsel Mueller's 37 page inditement of 17 Russians and see how pedestrian devices from regular people are used for bad as just ONE example.
I work here in Silicon Valley my whole career. The security breaches that happen and the ordinary people affected and unaware is very disturbing. The information is generally not released, as too not spook people into not maintaining confidence in the devices. (keep profits flowing)
For me, I download OS updates immediately and also buy a new iPad every 3 1/2 to 4 years for $300-400. Cost of the iPad per month is $8.50 ($400 / 48 months) for strong performance and security.
Interesting coincidence, but the only time I didn't update my iPad to the latest OS immediately in the 7 years I've used one was the one time there was a significant problem - the blocking of Bluetooth enabled external GPS. All other times, like you, latest OS with no problems.Yea I’ve never had a lot of issues with updating to the newest OS. My iPad mini 4 is always updated to the latest version of OS and ForeFlight and I really don’t have any issues.
How many people complaining about slow performance are still using iPad 2s or 3s? That is 5-6 generations out of date. The A series chips saw massive gains in the early days, and are still improving significantly faster than x86-64 chips so that is basically the equivalent of running Windows 10 on a pentium 3 and being annoyed that photoshop is slow.I see nothing in that announcement that says it will run faster.
I remember when were all happy it got us away from paper charts on iPad 1.
Soon it’s going to need to be run on a supercomputer and we’ll need to provide the device cooling water to keep it from melting down.
I see nothing in that announcement that says it will run faster.
I remember when were all happy it got us away from paper charts on iPad 1.
Soon it’s going to need to be run on a supercomputer and we’ll need to provide the device cooling water to keep it from melting down.
No, the problem with running Win10 on anything is that you're running Win10.How many people complaining about slow performance are still using iPad 2s or 3s? That is 5-6 generations out of date. The A series chips saw massive gains in the early days, and are still improving significantly faster than x86-64 chips so that is basically the equivalent of running Windows 10 on a pentium 3 and being annoyed that photoshop is slow.
No, the problem with running Win10 on anything is that you're running Win10.
snark.
Actually, it's the old guys who don't complain. We saw the same thing happening 20-30 years ago when computer speeds and software requirements were both increasing exponentially. Useful life of a desktop was two years, three on the outside, less if you were doing heavy graphicsOhhh the humanniittyyy! What would we do without you old guys complaining about new tech!
Just kidding.
Actually, it's the old guys who don't complain. We saw the same thing happening 20-30 years ago when computer speeds and software requirements were both increasing exponentially. Useful life of a desktop was two years, three on the outside, less if you were doing heavy graphics
I heard Bill Gates speak at one of the public forums Microsoft used to have for new product releases - it was for Office 95 or Office 97. He said (paraphrasing), "Our job as software developers is to make your new fast comperes seem slow."
The problem was that he hired overachievers...Actually, it's the old guys who don't complain. We saw the same thing happening 20-30 years ago when computer speeds and software requirements were both increasing exponentially. Useful life of a desktop was two years, three on the outside, less if you were doing heavy graphics
I heard Bill Gates speak at one of the public forums Microsoft used to have for new product releases - it was for Office 95 or Office 97. He said (paraphrasing), "Our job as software developers is to make your new fast comperes seem slow."
I know.I was just kiddinggg! I could never have the infinite wisdom that you old guys have
People have little appreciation how vulnerable they are to security threats, and resolution to security breaches are the OS updates. Read Special Counsel Mueller's 37 page inditement of 17 Russians and see how pedestrian devices from regular people are used for bad as just ONE example.
I work here in Silicon Valley my whole career. The security breaches that happen and the ordinary people affected and unaware is very disturbing. The information is generally not released, as too not spook people into not maintaining confidence in the devices. (keep profits flowing)
For me, I download OS updates immediately and also buy a new iPad every 3 1/2 to 4 years for $300-400. Cost of the iPad per month is $8.50 ($400 / 48 months) for strong performance and security.
It used to be that ForeFlight didn't pre-announce releases until they were ready to go. It seems over the last few releases they've broken that rule; probably to show something interesting for SnF.
It also seems they (and the other EFB developers as well) have slowed down on new feature releases. I suppose all of the low hanging fruit has been picked, but I miss the period between around 2012-2015 when new functionality was being rolled out every couple months. It was like Christmas every 8 weeks
I suspect their development focus is on corporate and the 121 business, where there's still growth. I have to imagine there's not a lot of GA market share left to compete over.
I see nothing in that announcement that says it will run faster.
I remember when were all happy it got us away from paper charts on iPad 1.
Soon it’s going to need to be run on a supercomputer and we’ll need to provide the device cooling water to keep it from melting down.
Truth. I run Mac and Linux personally but figured this crowd would be more windows orientedNo, the problem with running Win10 on anything is that you're running Win10.
snark.
Oh, get over it already Nate. It's technology. It's always been this way and it always will be.
I'm still running it on an iPad Mini 2 - Yeah, the 2013 model - and it works just fine. It's not super-snappy, nor do I expect it to be, but I don't really wait for it either. I expect to want something newer in the next couple of years, but seriously, it's five years old. It's due to be retired.
That is 5-6 generations out of date.
Ohhh the humanniittyyy! What would we do without you old guys complaining about new tech!
They haven't slowed anything down, it's just a more mature product now than it was...
Haven’t “gotten over” bloatware since 1982, and don’t expect to start any time soon. Call it 1983 since that was the first upgrade.
Computers have wasted a lot of my time. But maintaining the always bigger, always never any faster, beasties, at doing the same actual jobs for decades, has paid well!
This biz is overdue for a real Android competitor to FF. C’mon Garmin. Not sayin’ anything bad about FF, just sayin’ they need some competition.
Wait. They sold us an immature product?!
Or as the phrase goes, “They’ll sell you a beta test version every week...”
If you use that “Visual” button on the GTN you don’t want to hit “accept flight plan” from the panel after that. Just leave ForeFlight in the last flight plan that had an airport at the end of it. “Visual” on the GTN will wipe it for some reason.
... we shouldn't have been improving computing devices since then.
They're not "faster" because they do a helluva lot more.
I turned in “Feedback” this week asking whether the destination airport disappearing from the flight plan when using a GTN’s new “Visual” approaches is a Garmin bug or a ForeFlight bug. Haven’t heard anything back yet.
It's neither. Anytime you activate any approach on a GTN system with v6.4.1 software, the destination airport is replaced in the flight plan by (only) the approach waypoints. That's how it's designed. If you download that new plan to the iPad, then the destination airport vanishes there as well.
I think that almost exactly half of the GTN customer base loves that functionality, while the other half hates it. Garmin can't win.
Seems like it breaks multiple safety features but mainly the automatic Taxi diagram removing the destination airport but I see what you’re saying.
I don't like it either. I'm in that half of Garmin's customers who prefer the "non-FMS" implementation, where the approach gets loaded in front of the destination airport. My main complaint with the current method is that it invalidates the smart frequency look-up feature of the GTN radios. After loading an approach, you can no longer voice-command the GTN to "tune destination tower", "tune destination ground", etc.
I suspect their development focus is on corporate and the 121 business, where there's still growth. I have to imagine there's not a lot of GA market share left to compete over.
Nope, the 121 & corporate market is pretty much locked up by Jeppesen.
Well then, I suggest you go get an Apple ][ or IBM PC and put it in the plane, because apparently we shouldn't have been improving computing devices since then.
They're not "faster" because they do a helluva lot more. If we only made the hardware better and never the software... I mean, just think about how fast we could run Oregon Trail!
Garmin is probably the biggest competitor, but they're still behind because despite their much larger resources, they got a late entrance to the tablet EFB game because they tried to hard to convince everyone for a couple of years after the iPad came out that we needed to buy their expensive, single-purpose, non-touchscreen hardware that still lacked most of the features of the tablet EFBs. So, they're still trying to catch up.
No, but you don't build a successful software business by not selling your product until you get to version 10.0. Everything has a 1.0 at some point, and ForeFlight 1.0 was leaps and bounds ahead of what we had before that. Remember paper charts? Remember e-ink devices too small to show an approach plate and too slow to pan to the parts you needed to see? Remember palm pilot flight planning software? None of it was even remotely close to the capability of the first version of ForeFlight.
But, once you build something like that first version, all of a sudden you realize there are lots more possibilities, and the features come streaming in, and they're very noticeable each time.
And then you have a mature product, and people complain that you're "only evolutionary, not revolutionary" when you come out with the next version.
I believe that's a Garmin bug. I've seen it too. The visual approaches are a bit of a kluge, if you ask me, but kinda fun to let the autopilot fly 'til damnneartouchdown.
Most of the fractional jet videos on YT, the crews are all using ForeFlight. Jepp better learn how to write software or all they’ll have left is the international customer base.
All the airlines that use them, most of the pilots still love the charts themselves but want to throw the iPad hard at something when dealing with JeppView or the dumber versions they spin for 121 operators.
They’ve got serious problems looming.
It's neither. Anytime you activate any approach on a GTN system with v6.4.1 software, the destination airport is replaced in the flight plan by (only) the approach waypoints. That's how it's designed. If you download that new plan to the iPad, then the destination airport vanishes there as well.
I think that almost exactly half of the GTN customer base loves that functionality, while the other half hates it. Garmin can't win.
LOL. I see you’ve been well indoctrinated too.
The vast vast majority of business use of computers is data entry, spreadsheets, word processing and email. Add in “looking crap up on the Internet” in the 90s and you have the five things people really do with business computers.
OK, let's see you go back to an Apple ][ and do everything you need to do today in business.
Guarantee you'll be laughed out of the room when you come in with your documents printed on a 72 DPI ImageWriter.
The vast vast majority of business use of computers is data entry, spreadsheets, word processing and email. Add in “looking crap up on the Internet” in the 90s and you have the five things people really do with business computers.
How many people complaining about slow performance are still using iPad 2s or 3s? That is 5-6 generations out of date. The A series chips saw massive gains in the early days, and are still improving significantly faster than x86-64 chips so that is basically the equivalent of running Windows 10 on a pentium 3 and being annoyed that photoshop is slow.