dmccormack
Touchdown! Greaser!
- Joined
- May 11, 2007
- Messages
- 10,945
- Location
- Lancaster County, Pennsylvania
- Display Name
Display name:
Dan Mc
That sounds better - At 6,000 feet that's roughly 143 KTAS.
Or did you mean 128 mph IAS?
Knots
That sounds better - At 6,000 feet that's roughly 143 KTAS.
Or did you mean 128 mph IAS?
Dan, I'm glad you found that missing speed!
And what percentage power is that? On the T210 (1966) I've flown that's about 45% power below 10K'! Training power has little relationship to actual en route conditions.I've flown it too often at 21" / 2200 RPM. :wink2:
He just can't win, can he?Dan, no way 143 knots at 6000. N8411Z was my Cessna 205, completely book, and the book flat out at 6000 was 136 knots. I would get 135.
Unless there are a slew of mods for an airplane with only two years' production, I think this is BS.
Go back and look at your first post. It contradicts yourself to post 38.
I would suggest there is something leaking in the static system. Yes, it's a gorgeous C205. I'm a fan. But 143 knots (128 IAS at 6000) is just not a happening thing.
He just can't win, can he?
Dan, no way 143 knots at 6000. N8411Z was my Cessna 205, completely book, and the book flat out at 6000 was 136 knots. I would get 135.
I would suggest there is something leaking in the static system. Yes, it's a gorgeous C205. I'm a fan. But 143 knots (128 IAS at 6000) is just not a happening thing.