N1120A
Pattern Altitude
Where did I say that?
Right where you criticized them for obtaining a STC and releasing it free
Where did I say that?
I didn't do that. But I guess if you want to read things into my posts that aren't there, I can't stop you.Right where you criticized them for obtaining a STC and releasing it free
I didn't do that. But I guess if you want to read things into my posts that aren't there, I can't stop you.
AOPA has been working on this for many months, at the request of AOPA members. The STC application was filed on Feb. 14 and the FAA issued it to AOPA on March 2, three months before the Aeronautix STC was issued. It is coincidental that both were announced this week.
Why did you sit on it for 3 months?
Reference: faa.gov/licenses_certificates/airmen_certification/basic_med
When can I fly under BasicMed?
If you meet the BasicMed requirements, you can operate under BasicMed (without an FAA medical certificate) right now!
What do I need to do to fly under BasicMed?
Aircraft Requirements
- Comply with the general BasicMed requirements (possess a U.S. driver's license, have held a medical after July 14, 2006).
- Get a physical exam with a state-licensed physician, using the Comprehensive Medical Examination Checklist
- Complete a BasicMed medical education course;
- Go fly!
Operating Requirements
- Any aircraft authorized under federal law to carry not more than 6 occupants
- Has a maximum certificated takeoff weight of not more than 6,000 pounds
- Carries not more than five passengers
- Operates under VFR or IFR, within the United States, at less than 18,000 feet MSL, not exceeding 250 knots.
- Flight not operated for compensation or hire
Right where you criticized them for obtaining a STC and releasing it free
I received the STC yesterday. Shop A&P says the charge will be for 30 minutes to do the 337 paperwork. So free is as usual not 100% free.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
And while I did overstate AOPA's participation in the development, the fact remains that a simple "Hey, guys, just a heads-up, we've got an STC in the approval process now as well," would resolve my issues with AOPA in this, but that level of communication just isn't in AOPA's DNA for whatever reason.Actually, that isn't what he said. He accused AOPA of working with a business to get a STC developed. Then once the business was offering the STC as a paid product, AOPA released the STC themselves for free and cut their legs out from under them. The business is now out the money they spent developing the product.
We don't know that is what happened, but I have gotten this coming from other directions besides here.
Aeronautix had zero particpation in the development of AOPA's STC and any suggestion to the contrary is a complete fabrication.
As for the question about what AOPA was doing between March and June, great question! I was in favor of releasing the STC right away, but this is the first STC AOPA has ever owned and our very conservative and thorough legal team was researching nine ways to Sunday about the responsibilities related to owning and maintaing an STC and, of course, as only attorneys can, they were considering every possible liability scenario. Only when they had exhausted every possible angle did we get the green light to talk about it publicly.
Thanks for the reply TomHaines. Much appreciated. Lawyers can be thorough.
Why didn’t AOPA include the PA32-260 and PA32-300 on their STC? There’s a lot of disagreement about whether you can fly Basic Med in those aircraft and it is clearly a gray area.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Thanks for the reply TomHaines. Much appreciated. Lawyers can be thorough.
Why didn’t AOPA include the PA32-260 and PA32-300 on their STC? There’s a lot of disagreement about whether you can fly Basic Med in those aircraft and it is clearly a gray area.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk