Flew a 182 today

I'll have to try that.

There are several landing techniques in the 182...a power off where you can glide it in all the way to runway or fly it all the way to the touchdown.

One thing I have learned in the 182 is that if you are dragging it in under power at a shallow angle with full flaps across the threshold and pull the power to idle over the fence like the 172 the thing will drop like a rock and bounce you hard.
 
I can manage decent power off-landings, but it feels like I have less margin- like I use up too much of my elevator budget arresting the descent and then don't have enough left to get the nose up later. This is solo with full LR tanks, so almost worst case forward CG.


I'll have to try that.

I think it may be the huge-*** panel. It looks like the nose is higher than it is.

Every 182 I fly, I need the seat all the way up. In 182Ts (which don't adjust as high), I need a booster pad as well. I'm not a small guy. 6'3".

I'd recommend trying this with an experienced 182 pilot, to see if you really have as little margin as you think. I don't have a problem holding the nose up.

Or perhaps you're rounding out late. That would take more of your elevator.

Just a few guesses. Hope it helps.

The power-it-onto-the-runway strategy works if the runway is long, but it can eat a lot more runway than you need to.
 
Last edited:
There are several landing techniques in the 182...a power off where you can glide it in all the way to runway or fly it all the way to the touchdown.

One thing I have learned in the 182 is that if you are dragging it in under power at a shallow angle with full flaps across the threshold and pull the power to idle over the fence like the 172 the thing will drop like a rock and bounce you hard.

When you pull the power, you should expect the nose to want to drop. Let it, until you're ready to flare, and maintain the airspeed. The power needs to be pulled at high enough altitude that you can let it stabilize on the new profile.

Otherwise, you get slow, and you will drop. But they do not drop at approach airspeed, and that still leaves a lot of margin to flare and a soft landing.

I've made a number of 182 landings at Watsonville, and my usual technique is to pull the power over the localizer, provided I'm on speed. 60 KIAS at low weight, 65 when heavy (i.e., CAP -- especially, the cadet rides seem to always land 10 lbs under max landing weight).
 
I am going for a full pre-buy (might as well throw an annual in while at it)
Wanting to do a full annual inspection once you sign the sale documents is a normal thing. Doing the fine tooth comb and then discussing with the seller who is paying for what items (from the big expensive not-airworthy or major deferred maintenance to the medium deferred maintenance to the cosmetic items) is also normal. Just make sure you have a good buy/sell agreement working with your buyer that defines what it is you're getting for how much money, who is responsible for what items on the discrepancy list, and that you have the out to walk away if certain things are found/happen as long as certain conditions are met (such as, you don't leave the aircraft at your mechanic in pieces or unflyable with a large unpaid bill)
 
When you pull the power, you should expect the nose to want to drop. Let it, until you're ready to flare, and maintain the airspeed.

Exactly...and not doing that is how a lot of 182's wind up with bent firewalls. By trying to hold that same pitch angle as you might in the 172 when low and slow then chopping power. THUD.

Runway, meet nosewheel...nosewheel, meet runway!
 
I think it may be the huge-*** panel. It looks like the nose is higher than it is.

Every 182 I fly, I need the seat all the way up. In 182Ts (which don't adjust as high), I need a booster pad as well. I'm not a small guy. 6'3".

I'd recommend trying this with an experienced 182 pilot, to see if you really have as little margin as you think. I don't have a problem holding the nose up.

Or perhaps you're rounding out late. That would take more of your elevator.

Just a few guesses. Hope it helps.

The power-it-onto-the-runway strategy works if the runway is long, but it can eat a lot more runway than you need to.
I never liked the Cessnas; it's like flying the Spirit of St Louis. And I'm 6'.
 
On the landings discussion... whatever the "when to power" technique, the Skylane (and any aircraft) really appreciates a stable approach. Remember that good landings start off with a good approach. So if you are on transitioning from long to short final and are still chasing sight picture and airspeeds, start thinking hard about waving off, going around and doing better the next time.

I also agree with MakG that you shouldn't be shy about using a cushion if needed. Proper sight picture makes a big difference.

My landings once were crap until I realized a prior club member had lowered the seat. A short pause to adjust and things got muuuuch better.
 
Wanting to do a full annual inspection once you sign the sale documents is a normal thing. Doing the fine tooth comb and then discussing with the seller who is paying for what items (from the big expensive not-airworthy or major deferred maintenance to the medium deferred maintenance to the cosmetic items) is also normal. Just make sure you have a good buy/sell agreement working with your buyer that defines what it is you're getting for how much money, who is responsible for what items on the discrepancy list, and that you have the out to walk away if certain things are found/happen as long as certain conditions are met (such as, you don't leave the aircraft at your mechanic in pieces or unflyable with a large unpaid bill)
Roger. the seller is actually sending it for annual next week. its owned by a flying club and its due for annual.
 
I never liked the Cessnas; it's like flying the Spirit of St Louis. And I'm 6'.
Depends on the Cessna. 182 panels are enormous.

177 panels are nice and dainty.

But honestly, an Archer panel isn't much smaller than a 182's.
 
Depends on the Cessna. 182 panels are enormous.

177 panels are nice and dainty.

But honestly, an Archer panel isn't much smaller than a 182's.
177- true, I do like those.
View over PA28 panel is much better than a 172 for sure IMO.
 
Roger. the seller is actually sending it for annual next week. its owned by a flying club and its due for annual.
That would be a great time for the prebuy; have your guy witness, you'll never get a better, cheaper look at it.
 
Roger. the seller is actually sending it for annual next week. its owned by a flying club and its due for annual.
Consider asking if they can hold off on that pending your agreement to purchase it or not.

You want the inspection done by someone in your team, not theirs.

You can always share your pre-purchase inspection results results with them should you walk away and then they can choose to address them during the inspection they pay for.

If the cost of the annual was part of the sell offer, then work that into the written details as you see fit
 
Roger. the seller is actually sending it for annual next week. its owned by a flying club and its due for annual.

If you are buying you will want your own independent A&P to do the annual/pre buy for you...NOT the plane's regular A&P. Not all annuals are created equal. Mine was only 6 month out of annual but I had my own A&P do a full annual as a pre-buy. He found about $2500 worth of things that the seller covered. Having a unbiased set of eyes will catch things the other A&P might have let slide.


...as we are all typing the same thing at the same time!
 
Isn't the Q the first version that can be converted to a King Katmai? If so, then THAT'S all that I would want in a 182Q! :rockon:

http://www.katmai-kenai.com/

I have some right seat time in Squeege's Peterson converted 182. Those canards really do help with low speed handling. And we still got a real respectable climb rate on a warm day.

When I'm ready to sole own, the Peterson's are definitely one of the aircraft on the to be looked for list..
 
On the landings discussion... whatever the "when to power" technique, the Skylane (and any aircraft) really appreciates a stable approach. Remember that good landings start off with a good approach. So if you are on transitioning from long to short final and are still chasing sight picture and airspeeds, start thinking hard about waving off, going around and doing better the next time.

I also agree with MakG that you shouldn't be shy about using a cushion if needed. Proper sight picture makes a big difference.

My landings once were crap until I realized a prior club member had lowered the seat. A short pause to adjust and things got muuuuch better.

My 182 doesn't have articulating seats. I'm 5'11" & I prefer the seat cranked up high too.

Since I can't do that with mine...I just close my eyes on short final & hope for the best.
 
My 182 doesn't have articulating seats. I'm 5'11" & I prefer the seat cranked up high too.

Since I can't do that with mine...I just close my eyes on short final & hope for the best.
Internal AOA?

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
 
I'm 5'7" and fly with the seat cranked all the way up.
 
In my view (pardon the pun) the only downside to an otherwise marvelous airplane is the 182's visibility. As shown in the side-view sketch below, the top of the instrument panel is almost level with the tops of the side windows. You're either craning your neck to see over the panel out the front, or scrunching down to see out the sides.

Screen Shot 2017-03-06 at 8.29.33 PM.png
 
Please educate me here, as this is something I have struggled with across multiple types. In the 182, I'm at 75mph indicated on final and let speed bleed off until I'm over the numbers. I get down into ground effect, ease out the throttle so as not to bang the nose, and then repeat the mantra "hold it off... hold it off..." I set it down on the mains, but not at what I would call a satisfying nose high attitude. I am worried that if I pull back on the yoke too rapidly, the plane will balloon rather than just raise the nose. What am I missing?

Slow down more. You're probably light. Look at the stall speed to weight chart and adjust accordingly to arrive at the runway not more than 1.3 Vs-for your weight.

If you're landing on the mains that's "satisfactory". Getting it to squeak tires with the stall horn blaring is the next challenge. Remember the horn comes on well above stall so you're not that slow, but the drag goes up exponentially on that end of the curve as you slow, so you have to accelerate your elevator pull right as it starts to settle out from under you. Time it early, you'll go back up. Late, and it'll "plop" on often in the three point stance. It takes a little practice.

RE: The C182Q you linked..... If you're planning on purchase, talk to your mechanic about the fuel bladders. The ad says the RH one was installed in 1990. 26 years is a long time and this one might be due for replacement real soon. The LH side may need it too. So once you know the cost of replacing it (or both), then you can use that to negotiate the price downward some. Then plan on doing it during the next major maintenance cycle.

...

As always, get a thorough pre-buy inspection done by a mechanic of your hiring.

We knew ours were about ten years old and one went a few years ago. It ran more than the other person's number in the thread because it's a long range bladder and the labor is higher on those. It suuuuucks getting that last clip in. Skinny long arms and maybe a rubber wrapped fat dowel. Ran about $1800 and we bought new STCd fuel drains that install better and are flush (a set of them, so we have the other side one still sitting in the box) at about $150.

Different years of bladders from different manufacturers had different warranty periods also, worth looking into if yours were newer but they're way too old.

I wouldn't buy anything I didn't have MY mechanic make a list of squawks on, paid by me. Just sayin.

My procedure is usually 75 on final slowing to 65 kts over the fence (70 if gusty), then close the throttle. When in ground effect hold it level 5-10 ft above the runway and when I feel it starting to quit flying pull all the way back on the yoke slowly. If you do it this way you are ensuring there is not sufficient lift to balloon when pulling that nose up

I have also started to add JUST A LITTLE but of power as a pull the power back. I mean to the point where the engine sound JUST changes- no more than 50 or 75 rpm. I have found that this makes it for a softer landing- chirping the wheels.

I find it easier to flare way nose up in a 182 than I do a Cherokee or similar.

That's definitely a way to make the landings soft but you can practice and make them soft power off also. But if you've got the runway and you're trying to impress a non-pilot, a tiny touch of power and an extra 300-400 feet of runway is always an option.

Carry some power until mains down.

Not necessary. Just eats more runway. See below why.

There are several landing techniques in the 182...a power off where you can glide it in all the way to runway or fly it all the way to the touchdown.

One thing I have learned in the 182 is that if you are dragging it in under power at a shallow angle with full flaps across the threshold and pull the power to idle over the fence like the 172 the thing will drop like a rock and bounce you hard.

The reason the 182 both pitches down more and drops faster with power changes, is the size of the elevator and the amount of prop-created airflow over it.

The trick is anytime you touch the throttle in the flare if you're not already power off, be already planning to MOVE the elevator aft. Faster than you think. Nearly simultaneously.

It takes practice and that's why folks find the "leave a little power in" easier. The elevator quickly becomes less effective when that big windmill up front stops blowing air across it, and if you don't correct for that immediately, the nose will fall to seek trim speed.

In a lighter airplane the momentum hides this a bit. The 182 is a draggy beast when slow so it'll not only try to drop the nose but will lose a little speed and since you're pulling and raising the nose the drag goes up quicker and quicker.

I think of it like "hold it off... hold it off... sink... pull..." it's a feeling in your butt when it starts down and on mine it also changes the pitch of the stall fences vibrating.

When you pull the power, you should expect the nose to want to drop. Let it, until you're ready to flare, and maintain the airspeed. The power needs to be pulled at high enough altitude that you can let it stabilize on the new profile.

Otherwise, you get slow, and you will drop. But they do not drop at approach airspeed, and that still leaves a lot of margin to flare and a soft landing.

I've made a number of 182 landings at Watsonville, and my usual technique is to pull the power over the localizer, provided I'm on speed. 60 KIAS at low weight, 65 when heavy (i.e., CAP -- especially, the cadet rides seem to always land 10 lbs under max landing weight).

Yup. Many people don't think they'll fly at 60 and then go out and do full flap slow flight indicating 40 or lower at altitude and don't make the mental connection. It'll fly slow. You can go up to altitude and see how much power it takes to hold 60 and level with full flap and mimic that in the flare and it will work out well. In fact, set up for slow flight at 60-65 full flap and then pull power and maintain altitude until the stall or buffet to see how far and fast to pull the yoke back. You'll have it in your lap at the stall break if you really tried hard to hold altitude. Pretend you're at the runway and a foot in the air when you start and don't go up or down on the altimeter. Pay more attention to the yoke feel than the altimeter though. That's what you need in the flare. Small pull at first and faster and heavier as it slows up. Elevator not working as well.

On the landings discussion... whatever the "when to power" technique, the Skylane (and any aircraft) really appreciates a stable approach. Remember that good landings start off with a good approach. So if you are on transitioning from long to short final and are still chasing sight picture and airspeeds, start thinking hard about waving off, going around and doing better the next time.

I also agree with MakG that you shouldn't be shy about using a cushion if needed. Proper sight picture makes a big difference.

My landings once were crap until I realized a prior club member had lowered the seat. A short pause to adjust and things got muuuuch better.

Hahaha that's bitten me too. I now set the seat where I want it BEFORE I get in.

Or worst case right after I buckle up and realize it's all wrong, so I climb back out. Haha. I'll admit it!

Setting it too low, you'll flare high thinking you're about to drag your butt on the ground. And vice versa. If you're just learning the 182 get in the habit of setting the seat to the same height every flight until you decide you want to try with it in a different height.
 
Nate, why do I recall Mari saying something about how it takes balls to properly fly her jet?

46DAEE0E-2D5C-4093-9AA0-118422DE0B14-7202-000005949C166E70_tmp.jpg
 
Nate, why do I recall Mari saying something about how it takes balls to properly fly her jet?

View attachment 51895

LOL. The friend who flies the 787 says you really have to get the seat and that see-through HUD at exactly the right spot for your head height, or the parallax when looking through it and seeing a runway that isn't quite aligned with the ILS depicted on the thing, and other problems will drive you nuts. It also causes you other spacial disorientation problems if it's not aligned right.

Of course I tell him that he definitely has first world problems, but it's interesting that it's "a thing" with that HUD nevertheless.

Probably someday the future HUDs will have a camera that tracks your eyeballs and adjusts itself accordingly but we aren't there yet, in aviation anyway. Already being done elsewhere.
 
well, my A&P finally got back to me and said its a decent bird... the seller already have a deposit and a purchase agreement from another party. I am back to square one... I am going to go home, get in the closet and weep the whole evening
 
Theres a P model with a io-520 in it for around the same price. Wings need to be treated and the avionics are pretty dated, but it's got a lot of mods.
 
Theres a P model with a io-520 in it for around the same price. Wings need to be treated and the avionics are pretty dated, but it's got a lot of mods.
No fair teasing us with no linky
 
well, my A&P finally got back to me and said its a decent bird... the seller already have a deposit and a purchase agreement from another party. I am back to square one... I am going to go home, get in the closet and weep the whole evening
Lesson learned is as soon as you see something you're interested in, make contact with the seller saying you're ready with a deposit and a purchase agreement that covers things like log book reviews and physical inspections, and the ability to show him remaining funds are available so if all good, it's a fast close.

I would also follow on with that seller very 5-7 days to see if the current sale happens. Not unusual for the fish on the hook to not make it into the boat. A few "checking-in" phone calls would get the seller calling you if he loses his current guy.
 
Lesson learned is as soon as you see something you're interested in, make contact with the seller saying you're ready with a deposit and a purchase agreement that covers things like log book reviews and physical inspections, and the ability to show him remaining funds are available so if all good, it's a fast close.

I would also follow on with that seller very 5-7 days to see if the current sale happens. Not unusual for the fish on the hook to not make it into the boat. A few "checking-in" phone calls would get the seller calling you if he loses his current guy.
yeah, I am in contact with him and currently at number 2 in case the first one doesn't go thru
 
definitely lot more shiny than the one I am looking at (though I have realized that things looks a whole lot shiny in pictures), the big diff I see is the 650 and backup static and vacuum that this bird don't have
Yep. I was going to buy it and drop a 750 in it before I found out it had corrosion in the wings. On to the next one.
 
Back
Top