It was hit by a Cessna 182 that knocked it down and killed the pilot in December of 2004. It had another fatal collision and collapse prior to that by a Piper PA-28 on January 28, 1970. Two fatals. Both day VFR/VMC.
FCC standards forced the tower to be placed back at the original location if KFI wanted to keep their 50,000W power level.
The replacement tower was fought by pilots.
FAA said it met the current obstacle standards and wouldn’t weigh in further.
The Fullerton Airport Manager at the time went along with the FAA story and embellished it to make it sound “safe”.
Same airport manager was in contact with the tower owner in 2001 asking for strobe lights. Tower isn’t 1000’ high so none are required. Owner refused.
So his adamant safe claims were probably a CYA into why he didn’t push harder for lighting. The only reason the tower owner didn’t do it, per their own words, was cost.
The Fullerton *City* Manager, of all people involved in the thing to be negative about the tower, was one of the only government workers to say the tower was known to be a hazard, saying, “The antenna is widely regarded as a dangerous presence.”
At least the new one was forced to be lighted. Not sure it really helps all that much in the daytime, because I don’t think it was required to use daytime visible strobes, but I might have a bad memory on that part.
The pilots were completely outnumbered by the bureaucrats saying it was safe. The alphabet membership groups were nowhere to be seen.
The NTSB report has a hilarious description of a “survey” done of one flight school’s pilots by the investigator. “the investigator compiled the data systematically into a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet”...
Well...
I guess that’s better than non-systematically?
Also funny when asked if it was dangerous, lost said yes. When asked if they’d ever come close to hitting it, only 10% did. But who’s going to admit it? Hahaha.
Less than a third of the flight club members sent the letter asking for input bothered to respond anyway.
Maybe the opposing viewpoints of the Airport Manager and the City Manager were really showing that the City wanted to close the airport and the Airport manager had to defend the tower on “safety” grounds because he knew if it was deemed unsafe the City guy would close it. Don’t know. Seems like maybe there was a touch of this in the pilot population that was interviewed by USPS mail.