John Baker
Final Approach
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2008
- Messages
- 7,471
- Location
- San Diego, California
- Display Name
Display name:
John Baker
I strongly suspect that when the details come out you will find that you are wrong.
I'm never wrong.
-John
I strongly suspect that when the details come out you will find that you are wrong.
Well, since one of the trucks was out on a call, it's altogether possible that the lieutenant wasn't on property.
I'm never wrong.
-John
Was the man on fire?
Unless you're fighting the FAA
1. Proby will be let go, and he will appeal and get another chance.
2. LT will be allowed to retire at the next higher rank.
3. Everyone else in the engine co will do a Sgt Shultz; "I see nut-tink!!!"
4. Even more regulations will be added to the book; 'if there is a dying man, or you have reason to possibly suspect there is a dying man across the street, you will render aid, or call 911 if unable'.
1. Proby will be let go, and he will appeal and get another chance.
2. LT will be allowed to retire at the next higher rank.
3. Everyone else in the engine co will do a Sgt Shultz; "I see nut-tink!!!"
4. Even more regulations will be added to the book; 'if there is a dying man, or you have reason to possibly suspect there is a dying man across the street, you will render aid, or call 911 if unable'.
All members of that station who knew this person needed aid and did nothing should be fired and jailed. Their job is to rescue and render aid. That is what they are paid to do. They refused to help.
That was a hall of fame caliber piece of trolling, well done sir.
I'm sure the Station leadership now know they made a significant hiring error in the moron at the door.
I never troll.
My point was why'd they go to the fire department instead of calling paramedics? I see from the thread they tried and hit up the fire house as plan B. that makes sense.
I think cops for law breaking, fire department for fires, paramedics for medical emergencies and barbers for haircuts. Obviously if ya can't get one another could maybe help get the ball rolling.
Sorry if anyone got offended.
They were not good samaritans.. They were uniformed members of the emergency service of the District Columbia - federal employees who were PAID to render aid when needed. They had a duty to act and failed to do so. That failure to act may not be the sole factor in the man's death, but it would be hard to prove it wasn't related....While the story sucks to read. It's perfectly logical. As the Good Samaritan law has come under fire in the past 30 years and was reduced in many states. Still sucks, that we as a society don't value each other.
They were not good samaritans.. They were uniformed members of the emergency service of the District Columbia - federal employees who were PAID to render aid when needed. They had a duty to act and failed to do so. That failure to act may not be the sole factor in the man's death, but it would be hard to prove it wasn't related....
This is a TEXTBOOK case of negligence.
They were not good samaritans.. They were uniformed members of the emergency service of the District Columbia - federal employees who were PAID to render aid when needed. They had a duty to act and failed to do so. That failure to act may not be the sole factor in the man's death, but it would be hard to prove it wasn't related....
This is a TEXTBOOK case of negligence.
Thankfully you were in Texas and not the nation's capitol.I drove three blocks to a fire station in 2008 when I had a heart attack. They saved my life. It was the crew of engine #8 in Los Colinas, TX.
I never troll.
My point was why'd they go to the fire department instead of calling paramedics? I see from the thread they tried and hit up the fire house as plan B. that makes sense.
I nevertrollfilter.
I think cops for law breaking, fire department for fires, paramedics for medical emergencies and barbers for haircuts.
http://fems.dc.gov/page/about-fems
Mission Statement
The mission of the District of Columbia Fire and Emergency Medical Service Department is to preserve life and promote health and safety through excellent pre-hospital treatment and transportation, fire prevention, fire suppression and rescue activities and homeland security awareness.
Vision Statement
The vision of the DC Fire and Emergency Medical Services Department is to be a performance based organization in which a well-trained, multi-disciplined skilled workforce utilizes state-of the art equipment, technology and apparatus to provide the highest quality of Fire and Emergency Medical Services. To our residents and visitors the DC Fire and EMS Department strives for excellence in emergency preparedness, education and response, to enhance our customer focused innovative initiatives as industry leaders, while overcoming expanding risks.
EMTs and/or paramedics are pretty routinely attached to each fire station. That is pretty widely known.
I hd a charter here grandpa dropped to the deck, we did CPR until the USCG could get him off. ER Doc said it was nice that we did CPR for all that time, but he was dead before he hit the deck. Let the coroner figure out how much guilt goes where.
This really shows what excessive bureaucracy and governmental command structures can do.
Side note: A family member of mine who served in Afghanistan told me that on a number of occasions, they had to hold their position and wait for approval to return fire after being ambushed. Their requests HAVE to go through the chain of command. No if's, and's, or buts...
Shame.
The PERFECT reason why there should be NO rules for warfare.....
Kill them before they kill you using any means needed.....
Geez...
Yeah Ben, because that's what I said.
My agency has a no assistance policy. If I'm driving down the highway, see an accident with cars on fire and people hurt, I am prohibited (by policy) from stopping and rendering aid. Even though I have emergency lights, have first aid/cpr training, and a fire extinguisher and a big first aid kit, I can get in trouble if I help. That's a policy I will willingly break to help out others. I pay $100 a year for legal assistance for stuff like this, and I will happily call them if my management sends it up for my punishment. It's too bad that it's all about CYA without common sense.
My agency has a no assistance policy. If I'm driving down the highway, see an accident with cars on fire and people hurt, I am prohibited (by policy) from stopping and rendering aid. Even though I have emergency lights, have first aid/cpr training, and a fire extinguisher and a big first aid kit, I can get in trouble if I help. That's a policy I will willingly break to help out others. I pay $100 a year for legal assistance for stuff like this, and I will happily call them if my management sends it up for my punishment. It's too bad that it's all about CYA without common sense.
What agency?
That sounds like something you'd expect to hear from Walmart.
Lemme know if you ever need contributions to a legal defense fund if you do this.
I hd a charter here grandpa dropped to the deck, we did CPR until the USCG could get him off. ER Doc said it was nice that we did CPR for all that time, but he was dead before he hit the deck. Let the coroner figure out how much guilt goes where.
Yeah, that's why they've changed the protocol for CPR from no heartbeat to weak or faint heartbeat before starting. Need to improve save statistics.....
There is no such change in the American Heart Association guidelines for Emergency Cardiac Care. A pulseless person gets CPR unless they are a DNR or OBVIOUSLY dead (rigor, pooling blood, decapitation, massive trauma)
Stating such a fallacy as fact is dangerous.. because other people just.. might... believe you..
Statistics for CPR saves are already dismal, because in most cases the person is dying, not suffering from an easily remedied transient event...There's no need to put lipstick on the pig..